Mr Tibbs Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 Rudy Gestede younger , more scope , terrific in the air , I personally would go for him before Bent .He's not out of contract is he? From what I heard in January they were turning bids down for Gustede well in excess of a couple of million. Surely destined for the PL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milbs Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 You got around 10 million for Gestede? Cause that's what been quoted as wanting. Bent at would be a super signing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDeadlySaul Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 Watford want Gestede Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ovis aries Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 You got around 10 million for Gestede? Cause that's what been quoted as wanting. Bent at would be a super signingWhere ?. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ovis aries Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 Gestede looks set for Vicarage RoadOne man who has previously been linked with a move to the Liberty Stadium but now looks set for a move elsewhere is Rudy Gestede.The former Cardiff City forward, who scored 22 goals for Blackburn this season, was linked with a £7m move to the Swans at the end of April.But now it appears that newly-promoted Watford have won the race for his signature with reports claiming he is on the verge of a £5m transfer to Vicarage Road. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tombo Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 Rush says NO players will be signed without the new manager/coach's agreement, I he does not want them they will not be signed . Allegedly (but nobody can prove for sure, my lawyers have told me to say) we've had chats with possible head coaches before McClaren even went, so it is possible we already have an idea about what the next guy is going to want in terms of personnel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milbs Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 My bad it was 7, but now Watford trying to nick him for 5. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3069366/West-Ham-eye-summer-moves-attacking-duo-Rudy-Gestede-Javier-Hernandez.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunkyRam Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 I really hope we get Ince. He's a match winner and capable of 20 goals in this league. He's the type of player that justifys paying the entrance fee and enjoyed watching him last season.Bent is a no brainer for me, he just scores goals. Get him in! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YorkshireRam Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 It all depends on the new system the coach wants to implement.If we stick with 433, I'd sign Ince but not Bent due to Bent being too good and expensive as a backup to Martin. However, if we find a system that accomodates both players then we may see both arriving. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derbados Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 I wonder if Clement would adopt a more fortified style and, like Karanka play with two CDM's. Seemed to work well for them this season, barring Wembley of course . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uptherams Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 I really hope we get Ince. He's a match winner and capable of 20 goals in this league. He's the type of player that justifys paying the entrance fee and enjoyed watching him last season.Bent is a no brainer for me, he just scores goals. Get him in!Ince is capable of not only scoring 20 in a season, but also getting 13 assists and 7 penalties. Anyone who doesn;t want him can go down the road and support that other team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Teale Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 I wonder if Clement would adopt a more fortified style and, like Karanka play with two CDM's. Seemed to work well for them this season, barring Wembley of course . . . Why would you want us to be more like Boro? They played like we did under Billy, the two teams that went up scored over 90 goals compared to Boro's 68. I really hope we don't go back that way of boring negative football. We may as well have not sacked Clough if we wanted to do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEL Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 Yes please to both players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannable Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 Allegedly (but nobody can prove for sure, my lawyers have told me to say) we've had chats with possible head coaches before McClaren even went, so it is possible we already have an idea about what the next guy is going to want in terms of personnel.You want a new lawyer!'Allegedley' doesn't effect whether a comment is libel or not! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knabby crackers Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 Ince is capable of not only scoring 20 in a season, but also getting 13 assists and 7 penalties. Anyone who doesn;t want him can go down the road and support that other team.Why would I want to do that?I've probably been supporting my team longer than you, from 1946, and I am entitled to my opinions as previously stated on this forum. I maintain that Ince has never been and will never be a 100% team player, OK he will score goals and be responsible for helping others to score but he has an innate attitude that makes me come to the conclusion that he plays football possibly 70% for himself and 30% for the team.Some may be prepared to accept that contribution but it is not what I want from players who don the Derby County shirt, I do not want mercenaries, I would prefer players who will commit at least 99.999% to my club, I realise that some will not do that and I will have to accept loyalty to a lesser degree but the ratios that Ince appears to adhere to are not acceptable to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StringerBell Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 Tom Ince has a bad attitude because he's black and does stepovers. I thought we'd all agreed on that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tombo Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 You want a new lawyer! 'Allegedley' doesn't effect whether a comment is libel or not! I'm hoping "it is possible" is going to save me then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alph Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 So long as it's not like a lot of clubs where the players are signed by blokes that don't have to work with them and then handed to the head coach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bris Vegas Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 I don't want Bent. I don't envisage us having a good system to fit him in. No team ever has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mostyn6 Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 re Ince playing for himself... so sausaging what, if he does well for himself, the team should by default do quite well. If he gives 9/10 performances, then he has done his bit. What Knabby is saying, is surely that he wants Ince to carry the team? Not acceptable in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.