Jump to content

Too Defensive?


Recommended Posts

We have been very tight at the back lately with Mac encouraging the team to continue to be so. Although it has been obviously a good move results wise have we lost a bit of the attacking flair we enjoyed last season because of it? Can we be more fluid going forward and still keep clean sheets?

I'm thinking this is the next development we need to pull away from the pack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

We have been very tight at the back lately with Mac encouraging the team to continue to be so. Although it has been obviously a good move results wise have we lost a bit of the attacking flair we enjoyed last season because of it? Can we be more fluid going forward and still keep clean sheets?

I'm thinking this is the next development we need to pull away from the pack.

 

I think Thorne coming back will remedy a lot of this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have been very tight at the back lately with Mac encouraging the team to continue to be so. Although it has been obviously a good move results wise have we lost a bit of the attacking flair we enjoyed last season because of it? Can we be more fluid going forward and still keep clean sheets?

I'm thinking this is the next development we need to pull away from the pack.

he talks about the teams at the top in his pre match interview.  "most important thing has been keeping clean sheets"   "hard to beat"  etc etc. in the rams player interview, (thats longer) he's saying the training being more about recovery in the coming month, when we get so many games together, and that the players have had to do the other aspects of training and prep already, and that should carry us into a busy spell. i'm hoping with the additions of the extra and top end quality we just signed and a solid run at the back (despite t'forest game) it should come together in the next few weeks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Five 1-0 wins over our next 5 games will suit me just fine. Flair is a luxury in February.

 

Five 2-0 wins would be better for my dicky ticker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always worry when there's a lot of focus on clean sheets and "being hard to beat".

It only takes a deflection off Keogh's backside to go 1-0 down.

But despite the talk we're still creating plenty of chances when goals are needed. At 0-0 or worse we're an attacking team.

Compared to last season...

I think half the reason we aren't as fast and suicidal in attack is purely to do with how every team gets behind the ball so much quicker now that a draw with Derby is a good result. The opposition now are much more reactive to us than last season where they'd focus more on their own game.

Good thread though. Because tbh it's something that niggles at my mind but there's no solid evidence or reason to voice concern. But in the back of mind is Twente fans saying Mac's second spell was much more defensive and slightly negative. I don't want us to move away from what made us so good to try and make us perfect. There's tightening up and just managing games a bit more sensibly than the 3-3 draw at Birmingham. And then there's the focus on being hard to beat and assuming that the chances and goals will come. They won't. I don't think the scared to lose also rans that have clogged up the bottom of the PL (Villa, Norwich teams like that) ever set out to just draw every week. But that's how they ended up. So worried about what they're letting in that they were/are negative teams.

That's just a niggling concern. I'm not making accusations or anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uttox is right, attack is the best form of defence.  The Burnley way of going up was clean sheets, the Leicester way was all out attack.

 

I think this is a good thread and something to discuss because you could argue that our formation is a defensive variation of 4-3-3 not the pure dutch model. The McClaren version i think was born of the players we had, and our limited striking options, so we build goals. With Bent in there, ince, and Lingard, it opens things quite a bit. I like the way we play but take the Blackburn home game where we tic tac the ball around and had barely any shots on goal until Steve mixed it up after about 60 mins. We dominated but the whole crowd was getting frustrated that we might never score. Just feel that if we have a right go with 2 strikers etc and lingard and ince in there right from the score, we'd score a bunch and scare the crap out of our opponents. I'm sure he's thinking about it, but it seems apparent that he will go with tried and trusted and if it doesn't work do the same as he did v blackburn with all those game breaking players coming on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we were to win the next 10 games 1-0, regardless of how attacking we are, we will "pull away from the pack".

I'm not sure why people are so worried about us focusing more on the defensive side. When has anyone seen us play for a 0-0 draw in the past 2 season? Seriously, even on Tues eve when we travel to free-scoring Bmouth, we will go with the aim of winning 1 or 2 nil. Keogh will make the odd mistake, and if/when he does he will make a block or Granty will make an important save. And, if we do concede, do people think we won't create chances or score goals. We had a pretty good team in that department anyway, and then we add Bent, Ince and Lingaard in the last month...seriously!

Also, last season we would score 3-4 goals in a game once a month, and would score most games. Because we were not the team people gunned for. As the season progressed, teams were starting to realise that we were one of the teams to stop. This season, we went in as the number one team to stop scoring. Therefore, every teams game plan aims to stop us playing. It was always going to be more difficult. Yet we have a striker on 19 goals, are one of the leagues top scorers, and most supporters would say we are only just moving out of gear 2.

Clean sheets mean you don't lose. I will take 1-0 over 4-3 all day at this point in the season. We know we can score, it's nice to know the team are starting to realise they can also keep others out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You attack from the back. If you don't concede a goal you can't lose, simple. I'm confident in our team's scoring ability so if we didn't concede a goal for the rest of the season, we would win every game apart from maybe 3 or 4.

It's all well and good scoring 4 goals in a game but if you concede 5 then it counts for absolutely nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not reaching the flair of last season has niggled away at me too. But we keep hearing SM talking about "maturity" of players and performances. This is what we are seeing. Diciplined and clinical. Last year we were overloading teams with attempts at goal. This year all we need is one - do your job, pick your moment and take it. Ruthless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do believe that it wasn't you who started this thread.

However, if the cap fits.

It doesn't. Because I'm pleased. As is the OP judging from all his other posts on all the other threads. He just made an observation.

We have changed/evolved slightly from last season. Last season was full of threads about our dodgy defence and soft goals. But it was probably just as strong defence as now if not stronger. As a team though we were more reckless. More aggressive. More open.

Discussing the who, what and why is hardly moaning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...