kevinhectoring

Wish our journalists would stop asking Rooney what the situation off the pitch is. At best it’s pointless. More likely it’s damaging 

Ticket arrived Tuesday ?
 
Positive Covid-19 test arrived today ?
 
Looks like it's the wingback armchair for me. Least my drinks will be delivered on trays with doyleys.... ?

All it says is, Ashley’s ‘initial valuation’ of the club ex stadium was less than £28m. Probably means indicative bid.  Doesn’t mean a thing 

All it says is, Ashley’s ‘initial valuation’ of the club ex stadium was less than £28m. Probably means indicative bid.  Doesn’t mean a thing 

Stamford Bridge is in Fulham I’d say   

I’d think the stadium owning company can be put into administration. MSD have a debenture and there are defaults all over the shop. I’d guess the understanding with MM is it stays out of admin if he plays ball 

From the articles I've read, he didn't charge interest on any loans. 
According to The Athletic, he washed his face on dispersal of Newcastle, rather than made a massive profit.

Stamford Bridge is in Fulham I’d say   

I thought their offer did not include the stadium. If they hoped to pick up the club and the stadium for a total outlay of £30m I am not surprised they were told no. 

Calm down everyone 

Liquidate DCFC today and get it over with ?

Seems likely this is the uncertainty leading to the delay. But given Putin’s state of mind Q takes a risk by allowing further slippage. So (assuming you’re right) Q needs to focus on signing an SPA on terms that accommodate the two scenarios and avoiding a points deduction in each case 

Seems likely this is the uncertainty leading to the delay. But given Putin’s state of mind Q takes a risk by allowing further slippage. So (assuming you’re right) Q needs to focus on signing an SPA on terms that accommodate the two scenarios and avoiding a points deduction in each case 

I think what q were trying to say is that HMRC is in a creditor class if its own so can’t be compromised unless they consent. 
 
I go back to Hoskin’s comments - it’s pretty clear from those (not to mention the £28m bid from the Binnies) that HMRC has indicated it will voluntarily take haircut. 

I've heard that Q are busy building a giant sculpture on the PP pitch of a mongoose made of raspberry ripple ice cream and that there plan is to invite all the creditors to a meeting and while they are all stood there in awe looking at 'Marty the Pride Park Mongoose', Q will then take the revenue hit and switch all the heaters on and when Marty melts, the creditors will all be swept away into the Derwent in a delicious but deadly tsunami of cream and raspberry.
The stadium will be gone too of course but it solves the issue of negotiating over it. The preferred bidder will then rebuild it on the vacant site with lego bricks using labour from all the local primary schools. This then provides the added future revenue stream of allowing the club to rebuild and reconfigure for concerts in summer or put a roof on with just a quick call to the schools and the option to build a slightly lower capacity PP that will therefore still be full in the event that we have to play League 1 Football.
That's what I'd heard anyway.

A helping hand for next time, a freebie for you:-
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v
vii
viii.
ix.
x

I think what q were trying to say is that HMRC is in a creditor class if its own so can’t be compromised unless they consent. 
 
I go back to Hoskin’s comments - it’s pretty clear from those (not to mention the £28m bid from the Binnies) that HMRC has indicated it will voluntarily take haircut. 

I think this is confused. The 2020 tax changes weren’t aimed at football clubs. They were aimed at all companies. 
 
The rules designed to stop football clubs benefiting from administration are the EFl rules and policies 

I think this is confused. The 2020 tax changes weren’t aimed at football clubs. They were aimed at all companies. 
 
The rules designed to stop football clubs benefiting from administration are the EFl rules and policies 

Hoskin told us that he did not foresee problems with HMRC, who had agreed to be pragmatic given they view the club as a community asset. 
Obviously he or someone on his team has had this from the horse’s mouth. What makes you believe the contrary?

Yes Bournemouth know we’re loads better than Posh so they come to the game without confidence. Ours for the taking 

Always loved Stoke

Hoskin told us that he did not foresee problems with HMRC, who had agreed to be pragmatic given they view the club as a community asset. 
Obviously he or someone on his team has had this from the horse’s mouth. What makes you believe the contrary?

Hoskin told us that he did not foresee problems with HMRC, who had agreed to be pragmatic given they view the club as a community asset. 
Obviously he or someone on his team has had this from the horse’s mouth. What makes you believe the contrary?

Yes Bournemouth know we’re loads better than Posh so they come to the game without confidence. Ours for the taking