MaltRam

Ft 2-2 at Oxford 
 

We are where we are folks. We must have a striker in to cover us for a month or two.
Not a sexy signing, but a grafting pro with a goal in him.

We are where we are folks. We must have a striker in to cover us for a month or two.
Not a sexy signing, but a grafting pro with a goal in him.

We are where we are folks. We must have a striker in to cover us for a month or two.
Not a sexy signing, but a grafting pro with a goal in him.

We are where we are folks. We must have a striker in to cover us for a month or two.
Not a sexy signing, but a grafting pro with a goal in him.

We are where we are folks. We must have a striker in to cover us for a month or two.
Not a sexy signing, but a grafting pro with a goal in him.

We are where we are folks. We must have a striker in to cover us for a month or two.
Not a sexy signing, but a grafting pro with a goal in him.

Apart from 45 minutes v Fleetwood though, Vickers hasn't played with Fozzy and Nyambe in front of him. Maybe it's as much their absence that is making the defence less solid.🤷‍♀️

Not sure why this is being mocked. I thought he did a pretty good job for us when we were struggling in the Championship. 
Anyone seen him play recently? Just hoping his legs haven't gone.

If what you say is right, the sensible move from Roy would have been to clarify up front, rather than chuck in another 3 or 4 posts defending the literal meaning of the words he typed, only to subsequently change tack.
I reiterate, the man made himself look silly.
In other news, the two in midfield has looked wide open too often in recent weeks. Warne knows this as well as we do.

RoyMac5, your agenda is fine by me. Tedious how often you express it, to be honest, but if that's the way you feel good for you.
You've made yourself look a proper bellsniff with this episode though. Paul Warne has not ever said what you claimed, and circling round that fact trying to score points is just silly. Own it man!

RoyMac5, your agenda is fine by me. Tedious how often you express it, to be honest, but if that's the way you feel good for you.
You've made yourself look a proper bellsniff with this episode though. Paul Warne has not ever said what you claimed, and circling round that fact trying to score points is just silly. Own it man!

RoyMac5, your agenda is fine by me. Tedious how often you express it, to be honest, but if that's the way you feel good for you.
You've made yourself look a proper bellsniff with this episode though. Paul Warne has not ever said what you claimed, and circling round that fact trying to score points is just silly. Own it man!

If what you say is right, the sensible move from Roy would have been to clarify up front, rather than chuck in another 3 or 4 posts defending the literal meaning of the words he typed, only to subsequently change tack.
I reiterate, the man made himself look silly.
In other news, the two in midfield has looked wide open too often in recent weeks. Warne knows this as well as we do.

RoyMac5, your agenda is fine by me. Tedious how often you express it, to be honest, but if that's the way you feel good for you.
You've made yourself look a proper bellsniff with this episode though. Paul Warne has not ever said what you claimed, and circling round that fact trying to score points is just silly. Own it man!

RoyMac5, your agenda is fine by me. Tedious how often you express it, to be honest, but if that's the way you feel good for you.
You've made yourself look a proper bellsniff with this episode though. Paul Warne has not ever said what you claimed, and circling round that fact trying to score points is just silly. Own it man!

So he didn't say it? Thank you for confirming 👍

When have I disagreed with you?
Just asking you to back up what you've said.
If its just something that you've made up, its fine to admit it.
I'd think after the last few performances there is plenty to hold Warne to account for without making up unsubstantiated rubbish.

What's pedantic about it?
You've just stated that Warne has said that he isn't interested in midfield, and I'd genuinely like to see what he said?

Post a link up when you get chance, will be worth a read.

Ward, for good reasons, is third choice RB. We also have Smith as cover
Yes he can cross...but in a situation where we only have one fit striker, he can go.
Fornah has some positive attributes, but he's lost the ball poorly so many times that if it means we can get someone else in...he can go too. First half against Bradford he was excruciatingly bad. Not sure Warne can trust him.
 
 

Hourihane is captain, passes the ball better than anyone else on the books, and has done it all in the game. It'd be mad not to start him 90% of the time. The blend around him has to he right though.

Hourihane is captain, passes the ball better than anyone else on the books, and has done it all in the game. It'd be mad not to start him 90% of the time. The blend around him has to he right though.

Hourihane is captain, passes the ball better than anyone else on the books, and has done it all in the game. It'd be mad not to start him 90% of the time. The blend around him has to he right though.