PistoldPete

Not logical ! Wrong ! 
 
That’s like saying the glass broke when it hit the floor. Sure if did, but Covid knocked it off the shelf. 

I would prefer the NHS did actually save the lives of people that I love , but let's not go there. 
Yes I would also prefer it if Derby could pay the tax bill. It seems that they do not have £28 million down the back of the sofa.So what do they do?  
 

I do. And I could show you a mountain of articles, quotes from owners and accounts data to prove this, although I feel like I would be wasting my time as you would continue to be confidently incorrect ?

It won’t be clear at all. If they think that , then the reason they went into administration will not be because of COVID but because they think they can get away with it.
But clubs in receipt of loans to 2024 will be unlikely to claim that COVID caused their admin.

Always good to watch. Heh heh.

Who?

Ther was also a John Percy piece in the Daily Telegraph in which EFL sources were said to be "shocked" by our appeal against points deduction for adminstration. I think the link is somewhere in this thread.
 
Also EFL's disappointment mentioned in other EFL statements . Totally unprofessional. 

This means nothing to me.

What's the pun-ishment?

This means nothing to me.

We were said to need £13.5 million to see us to the end of season. It’s just possible you know he may not have that money in readies .
and even if he had I don’t see the Bank of Mel is any different to any other bank. If Barclays pulled the plug would we be expecting them to keep sinking money in pouring food money after bad?

Nothing, nothing at all.

You mean it meant nothing to you?

Two flaws that in your assertion. First, the assumption that he had any choice . Second the rules include the possibility of a no points deduction or less than 12 points deduction if admin is caused by force majeure. That is also part of the rules. 

Two flaws that in your assertion. First, the assumption that he had any choice . Second the rules include the possibility of a no points deduction or less than 12 points deduction if admin is caused by force majeure. That is also part of the rules. 

We have Jozwiak.

Two flaws that in your assertion. First, the assumption that he had any choice . Second the rules include the possibility of a no points deduction or less than 12 points deduction if admin is caused by force majeure. That is also part of the rules. 

Two flaws that in your assertion. First, the assumption that he had any choice . Second the rules include the possibility of a no points deduction or less than 12 points deduction if admin is caused by force majeure. That is also part of the rules. 

What rules did he break? And what rules did he break where  he knew what they were? The IDC said Derby couldn't reasonably have known they were breaking the accounting standard , given that the auditors and the IDC istelf all said it was all OK.

Two flaws that in your assertion. First, the assumption that he had any choice . Second the rules include the possibility of a no points deduction or less than 12 points deduction if admin is caused by force majeure. That is also part of the rules. 

Two flaws that in your assertion. First, the assumption that he had any choice . Second the rules include the possibility of a no points deduction or less than 12 points deduction if admin is caused by force majeure. That is also part of the rules. 

This means nothing to me.

This means nothing to me.

What rules did he break? And what rules did he break where  he knew what they were? The IDC said Derby couldn't reasonably have known they were breaking the accounting standard , given that the auditors and the IDC istelf all said it was all OK.

OK Rick ?