europia

Until it is proven that DCFC owe Boro and Wycombe money, they are NOT creditors. The decision has not yet been reached, so if the case is ever presided over in a tribunal or civil court, it is a future event. 

I was thinking maybe they should do something like what happens with Banks, where they take in deposits and lend them out.
The Banks have to lodge a certain % of the total money lent out each night with the Bank of England, and that comes from their own resources - so if it goes belly up then at least their own money is at risk to reduce the debt.
If club owners were made to do this with a central football regulator ( with ,say, the amount of debt calculated quarterly) it would make them think again about running up huge losses as they would personally be on the hook for some of it.
 

Until it is proven that DCFC owe Boro and Wycombe money, they are NOT creditors. The decision has not yet been reached, so if the case is ever presided over in a tribunal or civil court, it is a future event. 

I know there's a similar thread to this, and I agree with many of the points raised on there, but the emphasis on that thread is to crowd fund a legal case. Even if it raised enough money, it's hard to know where to begin raising a case. Besides, it would all take longer than we have.
So I believe it's really up to the Administrators, themselves, to undertake the legal action.
Clearly the EFL are not fit for purpose. They keep restating their position but they never explain how - under their unpublished rules - an unresolved claim is treated the same as a confirmed debt.
I'm no expert but there's another thread which lays out the legal position. Basically, the EFL's case is at odds with the law.
So why, if those claims are preventing anyone making a bid for the club, aren't the Administrators talking legal action to throw those claims out?
Before anyone says the Administrators are acting on behalf of the creditors, without a buyer for the club, those creditors will miss out on their monies being repaid.
Rams Trust, Black & White Together and the Punjabi Rams have meetings with the Administrators. They - and others on here - have access to the campaigning MPs.
So, please could they - at the very least - ask why the Administrators won't take it to court?
And, if they're not satisfied with the answer please demand action.
I am not within the catchment area of the MPs but will join an email campaign to them, the Sports Minister or anyone else that could influence this.
It's gone on long enough. It's now on the Administrators to settle this. The EFL are too inept to resolve it.
Administrators act on behalf of the creditors and ensure a buyer for the club so that those creditors get their debts settled.

Until it is proven that DCFC owe Boro and Wycombe money, they are NOT creditors. The decision has not yet been reached, so if the case is ever presided over in a tribunal or civil court, it is a future event. 

Until it is proven that DCFC owe Boro and Wycombe money, they are NOT creditors. The decision has not yet been reached, so if the case is ever presided over in a tribunal or civil court, it is a future event. 

Until it is proven that DCFC owe Boro and Wycombe money, they are NOT creditors. The decision has not yet been reached, so if the case is ever presided over in a tribunal or civil court, it is a future event. 

Until it is proven that DCFC owe Boro and Wycombe money, they are NOT creditors. The decision has not yet been reached, so if the case is ever presided over in a tribunal or civil court, it is a future event. 

Sorry to start a new thread but I feel very strongly about this. The two parasitic clubs should not get a penny off us. They should be taken to the high court and taken apart and if possible forced to pay damages.
Now, I have no faith in our administrators whatsoever to actually do this. There doesn’t seem to be an appetite from anyone to actually save our football club and see that justice is done.
I would  be more than willing to pay a sum to go towards Nick De Marco or suitable friend to take this to court on the clubs behalf. If we lose football is dead anyway. If we win we seek costs and get our money back or donate it to local charities if that isn’t possible. 
This needs actioning now. This needs someone - @RamsfanJim or BAWT to talk to the administrators tomorrow at the latest to clarify what they are going to do and if they aren’t willing to fight tell them we are.
I have had enough of this. Can someone who has contacts please contact the relevant people and get the wheels in motion. This parasitical, vindictive vendetta should not be allowed to stand.
 I am sure plenty on here will agree with me. 
#fighttotheend
 
 

I highlighted the key word. 

Until it is proven that DCFC owe Boro and Wycombe money, they are NOT creditors. The decision has not yet been reached, so if the case is ever presided over in a tribunal or civil court, it is a future event. 

They are not creditors, football or non football. The definition of a creditor is a person or company to whom money is owing. 

You can't be designated creditor status based on the probability of something happening in the future. It's ludicrous and only the EFL could preside over such a shambolic state of affairs. 

You can't be designated creditor status based on the probability of something happening in the future. It's ludicrous and only the EFL could preside over such a shambolic state of affairs. 

You can't be designated creditor status based on the probability of something happening in the future. It's ludicrous and only the EFL could preside over such a shambolic state of affairs. 

You can't be designated creditor status based on the probability of something happening in the future. It's ludicrous and only the EFL could preside over such a shambolic state of affairs. 

You can't be designated creditor status based on the probability of something happening in the future. It's ludicrous and only the EFL could preside over such a shambolic state of affairs. 

They are not creditors, football or non football. The definition of a creditor is a person or company to whom money is owing. 

Personally, I find these stupid KO times annoying.

You can't be designated creditor status based on the probability of something happening in the future. It's ludicrous and only the EFL could preside over such a shambolic state of affairs. 

You can't be designated creditor status based on the probability of something happening in the future. It's ludicrous and only the EFL could preside over such a shambolic state of affairs. 

You can't be designated creditor status based on the probability of something happening in the future. It's ludicrous and only the EFL could preside over such a shambolic state of affairs. 

They are not creditors, football or non football. The definition of a creditor is a person or company to whom money is owing. 

That's fine @Leeds RamI can assure you that all of my murder convictions are now spent and well and truly in the past. I'm not at all offended if you chose not to have a lift with me. ?