duncanjwitham

Oooh look, it's Eiran "Horror Show" Cashin, in the team of the week...
 

Oooh look, it's Eiran "Horror Show" Cashin, in the team of the week...
 

Looks like it's amortized in a straight-line to me... 🤔

Looks like it's amortized in a straight-line to me... 🤔

Yet he's been completely wrong about multiple things related to us.  At one stage he was confidently insisting that the new rules meant we would have to pay HMRC 100% of what we owed them, for example.

Looks like it's amortized in a straight-line to me... 🤔

Oooh look, it's Eiran "Horror Show" Cashin, in the team of the week...
 

Looks like it's amortized in a straight-line to me... 🤔

Looks like it's amortized in a straight-line to me... 🤔

Yet he's been completely wrong about multiple things related to us.  At one stage he was confidently insisting that the new rules meant we would have to pay HMRC 100% of what we owed them, for example.

Looks like it's amortized in a straight-line to me... 🤔

Oooh look, it's Eiran "Horror Show" Cashin, in the team of the week...
 

Yet he's been completely wrong about multiple things related to us.  At one stage he was confidently insisting that the new rules meant we would have to pay HMRC 100% of what we owed them, for example.

Looks like it's amortized in a straight-line to me... 🤔

Oooh look, it's Eiran "Horror Show" Cashin, in the team of the week...
 

Gate receipts and sponsorship each £1m down on my original estimates, with 'other' £0.5m down. TV £0.5m up, hospitality about £200k up. Overall income is c£1.8m lower than expected, altough it is over a 9 month period rather than 12.
I can't accurately say what our wage bill was, but based on previous Clowes' Development wage bill, our club wages were about £10.25m, with £1.25m in pensions amd social security. This would match my original estimate. However, a 12 month period would mean I underestimated by quite a bit.
It looks like our total other expenses were about £10.5m, and we made a transfer profit of just under £1.5m, which results in the £6.8m loss.

Knight (and any other youth players that were in the books) would have been valued at £0, as we never paid anything to acquire him.  That £3.3m would have been almost entirely the remainder of Bielik’s value.

I'm in the same boat - probably seen him play but don't really recall anything about him.  He's another right-footed winger though (on top of the 4! we have already).  It looks like he's been playing wide left for Charlton, but cutting in and shooting a lot.  He's barely averaging 1 cross per game for them.  So I'm not totally sure where he fits if we're still set on getting it wide and crossing it.

I'm in the same boat - probably seen him play but don't really recall anything about him.  He's another right-footed winger though (on top of the 4! we have already).  It looks like he's been playing wide left for Charlton, but cutting in and shooting a lot.  He's barely averaging 1 cross per game for them.  So I'm not totally sure where he fits if we're still set on getting it wide and crossing it.

I was certainly discussing it at half time with the guys I sit with - maybe get Sibley or Thompson on for TJJ because he was barely contributing, and we needed an extra body in midfield.  I can understand why you wouldn't make that change then though.  What I don't understand is how they go from 2-0 down to 2-2 without us changing anything. In fact, it's another 7 minutes before we make our first sub, and that's basically a like-for-like change getting Sibley on for Elder.
What they did was push Hugill up much higher than Bennett was playing, so he was almost a second striker.  It wasn't a massive change of formation or anything, but it was enough to start causing us problems.

I was certainly discussing it at half time with the guys I sit with - maybe get Sibley or Thompson on for TJJ because he was barely contributing, and we needed an extra body in midfield.  I can understand why you wouldn't make that change then though.  What I don't understand is how they go from 2-0 down to 2-2 without us changing anything. In fact, it's another 7 minutes before we make our first sub, and that's basically a like-for-like change getting Sibley on for Elder.
What they did was push Hugill up much higher than Bennett was playing, so he was almost a second striker.  It wasn't a massive change of formation or anything, but it was enough to start causing us problems.

Per whoscored, Bird played 27 passes forward last night, 16 backwards...

Per whoscored, Bird played 27 passes forward last night, 16 backwards...

Per whoscored, Bird played 27 passes forward last night, 16 backwards...

Per whoscored, Bird played 27 passes forward last night, 16 backwards...