Derbyram1983 Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 15 hours ago, McLovin said: That's not Hendrick's best position Central mid? Yes it is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sexydadbod Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 1 hour ago, Derbyram1983 said: Central mid? Yes it is Not as a defensive mid. He is best when playing as an attacking mid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derbyram1983 Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 He's not defensive mid. He's central midfield. If he was defensive mid he'd be just in front on keogh and shackell. I've got Tom Ince in an advanced stacking role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 2 minutes ago, Derbyram1983 said: He's not defensive mid. He's central midfield. If he was defensive mid he'd be just in front on keogh and shackell. I've got Tom Ince in an advanced stacking role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derbyram1983 Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Tom once is a forward not midfielder. That's why he plays behind the striker. That position is not a midfield position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
satty atwal Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Carson christie keogh shackell olsson hanson hendrick bryson johnson butterfield martin.... 5 centre mids as your midf 5... wingless wonders all interchanging Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sexydadbod Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 2 hours ago, Derbyram1983 said: He's not defensive mid. He's central midfield. If he was defensive mid he'd be just in front on keogh and shackell. I've got Tom Ince in an advanced stacking role. Playing a team without a defensive mid is a recipe for disaster. Non of those players in the midfield are defensive minded and if those full backs that you listed are playing we will get ripped to shreds every time blackburn get the ball on the counter attack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derbyram1983 Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Your stating an opinion not a fact. As I am staying what team I would choose. I wouldn't have a dm because I don't rate Hanson and Thorne is injured. I would go with 3 cm. I don't know if you know much about tactics or formations but all 3 wouldn't be chasing the ball and making forward runs all at the same time. One may push one and two drop or vice verse hence having two strikers and one player in the free role means not all midfielders have to be hung Ho. Brain dead or what Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Just now, Derbyram1983 said: Your stating an opinion not a fact. As I am staying what team I would choose. I wouldn't have a dm because I don't rate Hanson and Thorne is injured. I would go with 3 cm. I don't know if you know much about tactics or formations but all 3 wouldn't be chasing the ball and making forward runs all at the same time. One may push one and two drop or vice verse hence having two strikers and one player in the free role means not all midfielders have to be hung Ho. Brain dead or what Still doesn't work when natural inclination is to take the same space as the person next to you. This is why Hughes/Bryson/Hendrick were always absolutely pants playing together, despite all being great players. Can't just shoe-horn players together because they're the best players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derbyram1983 Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 3 hours ago, satty atwal said: Carson christie keogh shackell olsson hanson hendrick bryson johnson butterfield martin.... 5 centre mids as your midf 5... wingless wonders all interchanging The wingers are ****. Bit of a diamond formation. Ever heard of choosing a formation around your best players? The stupid formation we've been playing for weeks doesn't work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derbyram1983 Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 21 minutes ago, Srg said: Still doesn't work when natural inclination is to take the same space as the person next to you. This is why Hughes/Bryson/Hendrick were always absolutely pants playing together, despite all being great players. Can't just shoe-horn players together because they're the best players. Did t work before when we've played 1 striker, here were playing 2 with ince in support. I've never known us to play this formation with this set of players so how do you know if you can't tell the future? This was an opinion I had for the formation as wingers aren't playing well so why play them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 3 minutes ago, Derbyram1983 said: Did t work before when we've played 1 striker, here were playing 2 with ince in support. I've never known us to play this formation with this set of players so how do you know if you can't tell the future? This was an opinion I had for the formation as wingers aren't playing well so why play them. No one has been playing well, so why don't we change everyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derbyram1983 Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 beg to differ. Carson, warnock, Hendrick, keogh, shackell have been playing well in most games they have played. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derby blood Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Now we have the monkey off our back with the win against Brentford, I think we will get our first home win since Boxing Day, score 2 -0, to the mighty Rams, Martin to score again, and Russell, also on target, hope to be smiling again, and we can get our mojo back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inverurie Ram Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Bald Eagles Barmy Army! Great trip to Denver, USA back in 1999. We turned up at the stadium on a red open top double decker bus. Happy Days. Up the Rams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reithe glas Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 10 hours ago, MK said: And not play Martin? I think we could be about to see a serous return to form from him - would be crazy to risk jeopardising this. On the basis of one goal? One swallow doesn't make a supper. Stick with Bent, bring Martin on if required and re-evaluate in a game or two if necessary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duncanjwitham Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 28 minutes ago, Reithe glas said: On the basis of one goal? One swallow doesn't make a supper. Stick with Bent, bring Martin on if required and re-evaluate in a game or two if necessary. Martin has always been a streaky scorer - even the last 2 seasons where he's been getting 20+, it's been 5 in 6 and then 5 without a goal. He's been on a long goal drought, which he has just broken, so he should absolutely be in the team and given the maximum chance to turn that goal into a scoring run. And it's not like bent has been banging them in either... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derbados Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 7 minutes ago, duncanjwitham said: Martin has always been a streaky scorer - even the last 2 seasons where he's been getting 20+, it's been 5 in 6 and then 5 without a goal. He's been on a long goal drought, which he has just broken, so he should absolutely be in the team and given the maximum chance to turn that goal into a scoring run. And it's not like bent has been banging them in either... Agreed, Bent had his chance on Saturday and offered nothing, he was hardly in the game at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramos Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Martin in for bent for me then keep the rest the same. Possibly Ince in for Johnson but I wouldn't be too fussed if this didn't happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reithe glas Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 2 hours ago, duncanjwitham said: Martin has always been a streaky scorer - even the last 2 seasons where he's been getting 20+, it's been 5 in 6 and then 5 without a goal. He's been on a long goal drought, which he has just broken, so he should absolutely be in the team and given the maximum chance to turn that goal into a scoring run. And it's not like bent has been banging them in either... Meh, OK, you've convinced me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.