deanoakaram4life Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Who would you rather have in a derby shirt next season if you had to pick one!??! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Thorne. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bris Vegas Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Thorne. He's so important for our style, Bryson's goals are but his style isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uptherams Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Bryson soon to be 28 who relies heavily on his fitness vs a player that is 21 with the world at his feet...Depends on the length of time. Simply for next season...still Bryson. But over the course of 3/4 seasons...without a doubt Thorne. But I want both and I want us to keep Hendrick and Hughes too. Perfect Midfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfb Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Yup, Thorne, agree with Bris, plus bring in Aberto Bueno on a free with Thorne, job done (with Bunjacku as protege) Altho if its correct and the fee for Bryson is around 750,000 Then who knows re FFP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Bryson as Thorne won't be at Rams. Ferri Bodde saga all over again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North_Stand_Ram Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Thorne. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cam the Ram Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Bryson. If he isn't playing for us next season then it likely means we'll have lost him for 750k which is just ridiculous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaddesdenRam Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Who got us to third in the league? Bryson. Goals are more valuable in football and take away Bryson I can't see Hughes and Hendrick combined getting anywhere near his total. Not to mention his assists, a lot providing Martin too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dabber Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Thorne. He's so important for our style, Bryson's goals are but his style isn't. I agree that Thorne wins by a short head, but Bryson's style is crucial as he is the only one of the midfield who currently, consistently makes runs beyond Martin looking for the one-twos and thus pressuring the defence and accelerating the speed of the attack in the final third, Hendrick is getting there in that respect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YorkshireRam Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Bryson. If he isn't playing for us next season then it likely means we'll have lost him for 750k which is just ridiculous No likely about it, someone would have activated the hypothetical 750k release clause in January if it existed... I highly doubt it is in his contract, who wouldn't want a goal-scoring midfielder for less than a million? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bris Vegas Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Who got us to third in the league? Bryson. Goals are more valuable in football and take away Bryson I can't see Hughes and Hendrick combined getting anywhere near his total. Not to mention his assists, a lot providing Martin too. Sorry buddy but they're not, otherwise Barcelona would have gotten rid of Iniesta - who averages around 5 goals per season - years ago. I'd agree if we were talking about on the three front positions, but as a midfielder, goals are merely a bonus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cam the Ram Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 No likely about it, someone would have activated the hypothetical 750k release clause in January if it existed... I highly doubt it is in his contract, who wouldn't want a goal-scoring midfielder for less than a million? Maybe a couple of clubs had activated the clause but he chose to stay? I really hope no one at the club was foolish enough to agree to such a clause but Nixon seems so certain of it and he's usually spot on when it comes to Championship stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derbydave96 Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Brysorne? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaddesdenRam Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Sorry buddy but they're not, otherwise Barcelona would have gotten rid of Iniesta - who averages around 5 goals per season - years ago. Goals are important and valuable in football, surely that is out of the question. Iniesta may not get goals but he does provide goals. Goals come from assists and secondary assists, iniesta is key at that for Barcelona as he contributes through that. Also we don't have someone else in the team scoring 46 league goals a season (messi) to make up for the fact others don't score as much. I think, without Bryson's goals and assists last season we would not have got 3rd place. With Hughes and Hendrick for the whole season instead, fair enough we may have got a playoff spot but Bryson was key. Thorne was not. I think the way we play Bryson bombing forward to support the lone striker in Martin who likes to drop deep, is more valuable than Thorne covering the back four and picking passes going forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alph Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Thorne. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShaunTheRam Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Bryson for me. Think he also makes Martin a better player. Not much in it though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbobram Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Don't like this thread. we want both of them here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YorkshireRam Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Maybe a couple of clubs had activated the clause but he chose to stay? I really hope no one at the club was foolish enough to agree to such a clause but Nixon seems so certain of it and he's usually spot on when it comes to Championship stuff I think it would have emerged from someone similar to Nixon if a club had activated his release clause. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCFC_17 Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Bryson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.