Leicester Ram Posted April 26, 2014 Share Posted April 26, 2014 Currently in-form players like Russell, Thorne and Hendrick simply have to play if they're still playing this well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbobram Posted April 26, 2014 Share Posted April 26, 2014 What a nice problem this is. We don't seem to have any weak link in the team and we have players who are going to be gutted that they are not in the team because they have all been brilliant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
niram Posted April 26, 2014 Author Share Posted April 26, 2014 What a nice problem this is. We don't seem to have any weak link in the team and we have players who are going to be gutted that they are not in the team because they have all been brilliant. nice to see no embarrassing footballers ^_^ not pointing any fingers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladram Posted April 26, 2014 Share Posted April 26, 2014 If it's a game we need to control through possession then Hughes (away). If we need to dictate then Hendrick (home ( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaddesdenRam Posted April 26, 2014 Share Posted April 26, 2014 Team picks itself there is no debate. Back 5 the same St George in front Bryson is Bryson so first name in midfield. Hendrick has been quality recently he has to play Jamie Ward is a big game player and it's a big game. Chris Martin or Sammon hmmmm not sure Since his injury Russell is in good scoring form don't change it. Also won 4 in a row the old adage don't chnage a winning formula. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leicester Ram Posted April 26, 2014 Share Posted April 26, 2014 5 in a row now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DesertRam Posted April 26, 2014 Share Posted April 26, 2014 The only possible changes for me are Dawkins for Russell and Hughes for Ward, Id like to see Dawkins and Hughes against Leeds, with perhaps some more game time for Eustace as well! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord_Ram Posted April 26, 2014 Share Posted April 26, 2014 Pretty pleasing that we aren't beomoaning the board for lack of funds to buy proper players, when you look at what we've done with so little, Forsyth, grant, bucko and Martin all for free, Hendricks and Hughes and Bennett (snapping in the first team heels) all for free from out own acadamy, Bryson, Russell and Dawkins cost pennies and only one 1million pound player in our team (if you exclude the fish). And what a bench we have! Less is more take a hint forest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derbydave96 Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Same as today for me. Cant drop Russell and Hendrick gives us more of a goal threat than hughes, but he could definitly still play a role off the bench. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YorkshireRam Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Same team as long as no-one flops against Leeds. I don't rate Dawkins tbh, very predictable when on the ball and often loses the ball too easily. He's only been effective against weaker teams i.e. Yeovil. Ward on the other hand has impressed me as of late, seems to put in a really good shift now i.e. looks to challenge to win the ball back instead of moaning to the referee. His corners were miles better today as well. Combined with Russell, two great, hard working wingers with a bit of flair as well, perfect for the play-offs in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Don't know how this many people don't rate Dawkins. He needs investigating for using glue on his boots. Never miscontrols anything. It's remarkable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IlsonDerby Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Same team as long as no-one flops against Leeds. I don't rate Dawkins tbh, very predictable when on the ball and often loses the ball too easily. He's only been effective against weaker teams i.e. Yeovil. Ward on the other hand has impressed me as of late, seems to put in a really good shift now i.e. looks to challenge to win the ball back instead of moaning to the referee. His corners were miles better today as well. Combined with Russell, two great, hard working wingers with a bit of flair as well, perfect for the play-offs in my opinion. Dawkins, for me, is our most skilful player who can play that role... The ball sticks to him and he's so strong, he just ghosts past players like they're not there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derbydave96 Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Don't know how this many people don't rate Dawkins. He needs investigating for using glue on his boots. Never miscontrols anything. It's remarkable. I dont not rate him, its just that i would rather play Russell as he has a real goal threat, which is the most important thing in a one off game. For me, it was a toss up between Ward and Dawkins, I feel that ward would definitiely be fired up for the playoffs and will cause alot of problems. On his day Ward is a really dangerous player and assuming that he would be up for it, he just has that extra gear and passion which i am yet to see from Dawkins (although Dawkins is probably better on a week in week out basis). Also, i think possibly Dawkins provides abit more impact off the bench than Ward would. But it is a close call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G STAR RAM Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Playing how we are at the moment I would start with Ward. I like Dawkins but there is very little end product at the moment in his game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abu Derby Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Playing how we are at the moment I would start with Ward. I like Dawkins but there is very little end product at the moment in his game. Did he not provide the assist for the last two goals yesterday? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G STAR RAM Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Did he not provide the assist for the last two goals yesterday? Not from my recollection no. Hendrick made the 3rd goal out of nothing. Bryson played Martin in for his goal I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abu Derby Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Not from my recollection no. Hendrick made the 3rd goal out of nothing. Bryson played Martin in for his goal I think. Dawkins was the one who saw that Hendrick was in space and passed him the ball. Thought he played Martin in as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G STAR RAM Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Dawkins was the one who saw that Hendrick was in space and passed him the ball.Thought he played Martin in as well. If anyone but Hendrick gets major credit for his second goal it will just highlight the irrelevance of the term 'assist' for me. As for Martins goal Bryson and Dawkins are easily confused One of us is off to the opticians on Monday!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brammie Steve Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 As long as we have our former England manager with his proven track record and brilliant judgement in charge of our team I am happy to leave these choices to him. If summat ent bost dunna yo mess wiyit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G STAR RAM Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 As long as we have our former England manager with his proven track record and brilliant judgement in charge of our team I am happy to leave these choices to him. If summat ent bost dunna yo mess wiyit! Stevie Mac will be buzzing to get back on that Wembley turf on a nice rainy day! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.