Gaspode

There’ll be trouble if you suggest that @angieram in any way resembles Nora Batty….

There’ll be trouble if you suggest that @angieram in any way resembles Nora Batty….

I assume you're being sent there as punishment for being such a cheery  chappy......

I assume you're being sent there as punishment for being such a cheery  chappy......

Possibly, but with the threat of liquidation still hanging over us, then the administrators may not be in a position to sanction the extensions - a preferred bidder would give the club direction and someone to make those sort of decisions as the club would then be considered to be a going concern....

There's a difference betweeen them wanting to/choosing to and being obliged to.....

Sorry but you really don't understand the role of the Administrators - of course there is no club without the fans, but that doesn't mean that the Administrators are required/need to speak to the fans. The are answerable to the creditors (only), not the fan base.
Providing an update to us is a courtesy, which they do because they appreciate the links between the club and its supporters, but they are solely there to maximise the return to the creditors - preferably via a sale, but if not, by liquidating the club and selling off whatever has any value.....

There's a difference betweeen them wanting to/choosing to and being obliged to.....

Sorry but you really don't understand the role of the Administrators - of course there is no club without the fans, but that doesn't mean that the Administrators are required/need to speak to the fans. The are answerable to the creditors (only), not the fan base.
Providing an update to us is a courtesy, which they do because they appreciate the links between the club and its supporters, but they are solely there to maximise the return to the creditors - preferably via a sale, but if not, by liquidating the club and selling off whatever has any value.....

Sorry but you really don't understand the role of the Administrators - of course there is no club without the fans, but that doesn't mean that the Administrators are required/need to speak to the fans. The are answerable to the creditors (only), not the fan base.
Providing an update to us is a courtesy, which they do because they appreciate the links between the club and its supporters, but they are solely there to maximise the return to the creditors - preferably via a sale, but if not, by liquidating the club and selling off whatever has any value.....

Did you read the comment I was replying to? The suggestion was that the Administrators are answerable to the fans - which is quite clearly incorrect whatever stage of the process we're at.....

Sorry but you really don't understand the role of the Administrators - of course there is no club without the fans, but that doesn't mean that the Administrators are required/need to speak to the fans. The are answerable to the creditors (only), not the fan base.
Providing an update to us is a courtesy, which they do because they appreciate the links between the club and its supporters, but they are solely there to maximise the return to the creditors - preferably via a sale, but if not, by liquidating the club and selling off whatever has any value.....

Sorry but you really don't understand the role of the Administrators - of course there is no club without the fans, but that doesn't mean that the Administrators are required/need to speak to the fans. The are answerable to the creditors (only), not the fan base.
Providing an update to us is a courtesy, which they do because they appreciate the links between the club and its supporters, but they are solely there to maximise the return to the creditors - preferably via a sale, but if not, by liquidating the club and selling off whatever has any value.....

Possibly, but with the threat of liquidation still hanging over us, then the administrators may not be in a position to sanction the extensions - a preferred bidder would give the club direction and someone to make those sort of decisions as the club would then be considered to be a going concern....

You're righ, but perhaps it was imminent - then perhaps a new bidder appeared - or one of the exisiting ones had second thoughts.
Nothing is done until it's done - the constant whinging and gnashing of teeth on here by folk that should know better is pointless at best.....

Possibly, but with the threat of liquidation still hanging over us, then the administrators may not be in a position to sanction the extensions - a preferred bidder would give the club direction and someone to make those sort of decisions as the club would then be considered to be a going concern....

In addition, I've not seen any mention of us being formally charged relating with breaking FFP - just that the EFL had reviewed the re-submitted accounts and considered that we would be in breach - the administrators agreed to a points deduction to allow the sale to move forward, but are unlikely to have admitted any guilt as part of the deal.
There's a huge legal difference to us being thought to have broken FFP rules and actually being charged with the breach (which we could have defended and appealed) - therefore any suggestion of 'cheating' is purely subjective and wouldn't stand up in court.....

In addition, I've not seen any mention of us being formally charged relating with breaking FFP - just that the EFL had reviewed the re-submitted accounts and considered that we would be in breach - the administrators agreed to a points deduction to allow the sale to move forward, but are unlikely to have admitted any guilt as part of the deal.
There's a huge legal difference to us being thought to have broken FFP rules and actually being charged with the breach (which we could have defended and appealed) - therefore any suggestion of 'cheating' is purely subjective and wouldn't stand up in court.....

In addition, I've not seen any mention of us being formally charged relating with breaking FFP - just that the EFL had reviewed the re-submitted accounts and considered that we would be in breach - the administrators agreed to a points deduction to allow the sale to move forward, but are unlikely to have admitted any guilt as part of the deal.
There's a huge legal difference to us being thought to have broken FFP rules and actually being charged with the breach (which we could have defended and appealed) - therefore any suggestion of 'cheating' is purely subjective and wouldn't stand up in court.....

In addition, I've not seen any mention of us being formally charged relating with breaking FFP - just that the EFL had reviewed the re-submitted accounts and considered that we would be in breach - the administrators agreed to a points deduction to allow the sale to move forward, but are unlikely to have admitted any guilt as part of the deal.
There's a huge legal difference to us being thought to have broken FFP rules and actually being charged with the breach (which we could have defended and appealed) - therefore any suggestion of 'cheating' is purely subjective and wouldn't stand up in court.....

Nixon talks poo. 

Thank you for your sacrifice ?

They're obviously spending too much time drip feeding information to a pair of partially literate nut jobs on here to get the job done post haste.....

Dear mods,
Can we please change the title of this thread to: Alan Nixon Breaks Wind...
Technically speaking, it's probably more accurate and would make me laugh because I'm quite juvenile and still think fart jokes are funny.
Ta x

Steve Gibson?