Stive Pesley

That's an interesting sidestep from Parry
The EFL's cop-out has always been that they have to represent ALL member clubs and cannot be seen to be favouring one over the other
So here, he is basically saying - "if MFC and WWFC agree to it, then we have no reason to disagree - none of it is our fault"
Which in turn means that MFC and WWFC either agree to it, or they are explicitly admitting that they DO want to extort an "out of court" settlement from DCFC the club - because they've been given an opportunity to take it up with MM directly, and have it dealt with properly in a court of law - outside of our administration/insolvency process.
If they believe they have a case - they should be confident enough to take that opportunity
If they don't take it - it's because they know they have no case, but instead know that they can extort money from the club who are on the brink of liquidation
 
 
 

That's an interesting sidestep from Parry
The EFL's cop-out has always been that they have to represent ALL member clubs and cannot be seen to be favouring one over the other
So here, he is basically saying - "if MFC and WWFC agree to it, then we have no reason to disagree - none of it is our fault"
Which in turn means that MFC and WWFC either agree to it, or they are explicitly admitting that they DO want to extort an "out of court" settlement from DCFC the club - because they've been given an opportunity to take it up with MM directly, and have it dealt with properly in a court of law - outside of our administration/insolvency process.
If they believe they have a case - they should be confident enough to take that opportunity
If they don't take it - it's because they know they have no case, but instead know that they can extort money from the club who are on the brink of liquidation
 
 
 

That's an interesting sidestep from Parry
The EFL's cop-out has always been that they have to represent ALL member clubs and cannot be seen to be favouring one over the other
So here, he is basically saying - "if MFC and WWFC agree to it, then we have no reason to disagree - none of it is our fault"
Which in turn means that MFC and WWFC either agree to it, or they are explicitly admitting that they DO want to extort an "out of court" settlement from DCFC the club - because they've been given an opportunity to take it up with MM directly, and have it dealt with properly in a court of law - outside of our administration/insolvency process.
If they believe they have a case - they should be confident enough to take that opportunity
If they don't take it - it's because they know they have no case, but instead know that they can extort money from the club who are on the brink of liquidation
 
 
 

That's an interesting sidestep from Parry
The EFL's cop-out has always been that they have to represent ALL member clubs and cannot be seen to be favouring one over the other
So here, he is basically saying - "if MFC and WWFC agree to it, then we have no reason to disagree - none of it is our fault"
Which in turn means that MFC and WWFC either agree to it, or they are explicitly admitting that they DO want to extort an "out of court" settlement from DCFC the club - because they've been given an opportunity to take it up with MM directly, and have it dealt with properly in a court of law - outside of our administration/insolvency process.
If they believe they have a case - they should be confident enough to take that opportunity
If they don't take it - it's because they know they have no case, but instead know that they can extort money from the club who are on the brink of liquidation
 
 
 

That's an interesting sidestep from Parry
The EFL's cop-out has always been that they have to represent ALL member clubs and cannot be seen to be favouring one over the other
So here, he is basically saying - "if MFC and WWFC agree to it, then we have no reason to disagree - none of it is our fault"
Which in turn means that MFC and WWFC either agree to it, or they are explicitly admitting that they DO want to extort an "out of court" settlement from DCFC the club - because they've been given an opportunity to take it up with MM directly, and have it dealt with properly in a court of law - outside of our administration/insolvency process.
If they believe they have a case - they should be confident enough to take that opportunity
If they don't take it - it's because they know they have no case, but instead know that they can extort money from the club who are on the brink of liquidation
 
 
 

That's an interesting sidestep from Parry
The EFL's cop-out has always been that they have to represent ALL member clubs and cannot be seen to be favouring one over the other
So here, he is basically saying - "if MFC and WWFC agree to it, then we have no reason to disagree - none of it is our fault"
Which in turn means that MFC and WWFC either agree to it, or they are explicitly admitting that they DO want to extort an "out of court" settlement from DCFC the club - because they've been given an opportunity to take it up with MM directly, and have it dealt with properly in a court of law - outside of our administration/insolvency process.
If they believe they have a case - they should be confident enough to take that opportunity
If they don't take it - it's because they know they have no case, but instead know that they can extort money from the club who are on the brink of liquidation
 
 
 

Mel didn't start the fire. 

yeah alright Billy Joel
 

If only the EFL had a spine and had said from the outset to it's member clubs:
The punishment for failing FFP/P&S IS the punishment.
As per our clear rules on points deductions, fines etc
There is no avenue for other members to start suing each other as additional punishment. This is not allowed
 
That should be in the EFL rule book
 
If you murder a postman, you get sent to prison for life. That's the punishment
The people who didn't get their post delivered that day don't get to line up and punch you in the face too
 
 
 
 
 

It's just weird - how can they tell Administrators of an insolvent  company to NOT use insolvency laws??
 

It's just weird - how can they tell Administrators of an insolvent  company to NOT use insolvency laws??
 

If only the EFL had a spine and had said from the outset to it's member clubs:
The punishment for failing FFP/P&S IS the punishment.
As per our clear rules on points deductions, fines etc
There is no avenue for other members to start suing each other as additional punishment. This is not allowed
 
That should be in the EFL rule book
 
If you murder a postman, you get sent to prison for life. That's the punishment
The people who didn't get their post delivered that day don't get to line up and punch you in the face too
 
 
 
 
 

If only the EFL had a spine and had said from the outset to it's member clubs:
The punishment for failing FFP/P&S IS the punishment.
As per our clear rules on points deductions, fines etc
There is no avenue for other members to start suing each other as additional punishment. This is not allowed
 
That should be in the EFL rule book
 
If you murder a postman, you get sent to prison for life. That's the punishment
The people who didn't get their post delivered that day don't get to line up and punch you in the face too
 
 
 
 
 

It's just weird - how can they tell Administrators of an insolvent  company to NOT use insolvency laws??
 

If only the EFL had a spine and had said from the outset to it's member clubs:
The punishment for failing FFP/P&S IS the punishment.
As per our clear rules on points deductions, fines etc
There is no avenue for other members to start suing each other as additional punishment. This is not allowed
 
That should be in the EFL rule book
 
If you murder a postman, you get sent to prison for life. That's the punishment
The people who didn't get their post delivered that day don't get to line up and punch you in the face too
 
 
 
 
 

If only the EFL had a spine and had said from the outset to it's member clubs:
The punishment for failing FFP/P&S IS the punishment.
As per our clear rules on points deductions, fines etc
There is no avenue for other members to start suing each other as additional punishment. This is not allowed
 
That should be in the EFL rule book
 
If you murder a postman, you get sent to prison for life. That's the punishment
The people who didn't get their post delivered that day don't get to line up and punch you in the face too
 
 
 
 
 

If only the EFL had a spine and had said from the outset to it's member clubs:
The punishment for failing FFP/P&S IS the punishment.
As per our clear rules on points deductions, fines etc
There is no avenue for other members to start suing each other as additional punishment. This is not allowed
 
That should be in the EFL rule book
 
If you murder a postman, you get sent to prison for life. That's the punishment
The people who didn't get their post delivered that day don't get to line up and punch you in the face too
 
 
 
 
 

If only the EFL had a spine and had said from the outset to it's member clubs:
The punishment for failing FFP/P&S IS the punishment.
As per our clear rules on points deductions, fines etc
There is no avenue for other members to start suing each other as additional punishment. This is not allowed
 
That should be in the EFL rule book
 
If you murder a postman, you get sent to prison for life. That's the punishment
The people who didn't get their post delivered that day don't get to line up and punch you in the face too
 
 
 
 
 

If only the EFL had a spine and had said from the outset to it's member clubs:
The punishment for failing FFP/P&S IS the punishment.
As per our clear rules on points deductions, fines etc
There is no avenue for other members to start suing each other as additional punishment. This is not allowed
 
That should be in the EFL rule book
 
If you murder a postman, you get sent to prison for life. That's the punishment
The people who didn't get their post delivered that day don't get to line up and punch you in the face too
 
 
 
 
 

If only the EFL had a spine and had said from the outset to it's member clubs:
The punishment for failing FFP/P&S IS the punishment.
As per our clear rules on points deductions, fines etc
There is no avenue for other members to start suing each other as additional punishment. This is not allowed
 
That should be in the EFL rule book
 
If you murder a postman, you get sent to prison for life. That's the punishment
The people who didn't get their post delivered that day don't get to line up and punch you in the face too
 
 
 
 
 

If only the EFL had a spine and had said from the outset to it's member clubs:
The punishment for failing FFP/P&S IS the punishment.
As per our clear rules on points deductions, fines etc
There is no avenue for other members to start suing each other as additional punishment. This is not allowed
 
That should be in the EFL rule book
 
If you murder a postman, you get sent to prison for life. That's the punishment
The people who didn't get their post delivered that day don't get to line up and punch you in the face too
 
 
 
 
 

It's just weird - how can they tell Administrators of an insolvent  company to NOT use insolvency laws??
 

It's just weird - how can they tell Administrators of an insolvent  company to NOT use insolvency laws??
 

It's just weird - how can they tell Administrators of an insolvent  company to NOT use insolvency laws??
 

It's just weird - how can they tell Administrators of an insolvent  company to NOT use insolvency laws??