May Contain Nuts

Not one person is dismissing everything negative as false, pretending that the club is in a good state or that its finances have been well managed.
There are a number of posters who've calmly analysed the content of the articles and looked into what the figures might actually refer to.
I just find it weird when people take everything written that's negative at face value, but don't allow the same courtesy in respect to the less alarmist articles and analysis.
 

Not one person is dismissing everything negative as false, pretending that the club is in a good state or that its finances have been well managed.
There are a number of posters who've calmly analysed the content of the articles and looked into what the figures might actually refer to.
I just find it weird when people take everything written that's negative at face value, but don't allow the same courtesy in respect to the less alarmist articles and analysis.
 

Why exactly are you so desperate to believe the worst that sensationalist hacks come up with, but so keen to dismiss a reputable source such as John Percy?
His last sentence was true - the club (foolishly) expected the money to drop into their bank account in late November. That it didn't happen doesn't make his comment false.

Beat me to finding/posting the tweet by about 20 seconds!
Some fans really seem to enjoy sticking the boot in to their own club. Things are bad enough without doing that.

Not one person is dismissing everything negative as false, pretending that the club is in a good state or that its finances have been well managed.
There are a number of posters who've calmly analysed the content of the articles and looked into what the figures might actually refer to.
I just find it weird when people take everything written that's negative at face value, but don't allow the same courtesy in respect to the less alarmist articles and analysis.
 

Not one person is dismissing everything negative as false, pretending that the club is in a good state or that its finances have been well managed.
There are a number of posters who've calmly analysed the content of the articles and looked into what the figures might actually refer to.
I just find it weird when people take everything written that's negative at face value, but don't allow the same courtesy in respect to the less alarmist articles and analysis.
 

Not one person is dismissing everything negative as false, pretending that the club is in a good state or that its finances have been well managed.
There are a number of posters who've calmly analysed the content of the articles and looked into what the figures might actually refer to.
I just find it weird when people take everything written that's negative at face value, but don't allow the same courtesy in respect to the less alarmist articles and analysis.
 

Not one person is dismissing everything negative as false, pretending that the club is in a good state or that its finances have been well managed.
There are a number of posters who've calmly analysed the content of the articles and looked into what the figures might actually refer to.
I just find it weird when people take everything written that's negative at face value, but don't allow the same courtesy in respect to the less alarmist articles and analysis.
 

Why exactly are you so desperate to believe the worst that sensationalist hacks come up with, but so keen to dismiss a reputable source such as John Percy?
His last sentence was true - the club (foolishly) expected the money to drop into their bank account in late November. That it didn't happen doesn't make his comment false.

Not one person is dismissing everything negative as false, pretending that the club is in a good state or that its finances have been well managed.
There are a number of posters who've calmly analysed the content of the articles and looked into what the figures might actually refer to.
I just find it weird when people take everything written that's negative at face value, but don't allow the same courtesy in respect to the less alarmist articles and analysis.
 

Beat me to finding/posting the tweet by about 20 seconds!
Some fans really seem to enjoy sticking the boot in to their own club. Things are bad enough without doing that.

Not one person is dismissing everything negative as false, pretending that the club is in a good state or that its finances have been well managed.
There are a number of posters who've calmly analysed the content of the articles and looked into what the figures might actually refer to.
I just find it weird when people take everything written that's negative at face value, but don't allow the same courtesy in respect to the less alarmist articles and analysis.
 

Not one person is dismissing everything negative as false, pretending that the club is in a good state or that its finances have been well managed.
There are a number of posters who've calmly analysed the content of the articles and looked into what the figures might actually refer to.
I just find it weird when people take everything written that's negative at face value, but don't allow the same courtesy in respect to the less alarmist articles and analysis.
 

Not one person is dismissing everything negative as false, pretending that the club is in a good state or that its finances have been well managed.
There are a number of posters who've calmly analysed the content of the articles and looked into what the figures might actually refer to.
I just find it weird when people take everything written that's negative at face value, but don't allow the same courtesy in respect to the less alarmist articles and analysis.
 

Not one person is dismissing everything negative as false, pretending that the club is in a good state or that its finances have been well managed.
There are a number of posters who've calmly analysed the content of the articles and looked into what the figures might actually refer to.
I just find it weird when people take everything written that's negative at face value, but don't allow the same courtesy in respect to the less alarmist articles and analysis.
 

Not one person is dismissing everything negative as false, pretending that the club is in a good state or that its finances have been well managed.
There are a number of posters who've calmly analysed the content of the articles and looked into what the figures might actually refer to.
I just find it weird when people take everything written that's negative at face value, but don't allow the same courtesy in respect to the less alarmist articles and analysis.
 

Why exactly are you so desperate to believe the worst that sensationalist hacks come up with, but so keen to dismiss a reputable source such as John Percy?
His last sentence was true - the club (foolishly) expected the money to drop into their bank account in late November. That it didn't happen doesn't make his comment false.

Why exactly are you so desperate to believe the worst that sensationalist hacks come up with, but so keen to dismiss a reputable source such as John Percy?
His last sentence was true - the club (foolishly) expected the money to drop into their bank account in late November. That it didn't happen doesn't make his comment false.

Why exactly are you so desperate to believe the worst that sensationalist hacks come up with, but so keen to dismiss a reputable source such as John Percy?
His last sentence was true - the club (foolishly) expected the money to drop into their bank account in late November. That it didn't happen doesn't make his comment false.

I can listen to anything if beer is involved ?

We could always follow Derby County Ladies, as long as they're not caught up in any collapse.

I’m no Mel apologist, I think the writing has been on the wall for a long time. Or atleast from summer through to Cocu’s departure. 
But...I don’t know whether this article quite passes a good journalism test and I’m highly sceptical where they get their information from. You have to consider that someone wants that information out there. This isn’t ‘Derby is in a mess, and we’ve seen the figures to back this up’ it comes across a second hand info. It’s more speculative than investigative. 
The club is in a dreadful state, and what’s actually been going on is slowly coming to light, but that doesn’t mean I’m gonna lap up every article out there that agrees with that viewpoint without question 

Beat me to finding/posting the tweet by about 20 seconds!
Some fans really seem to enjoy sticking the boot in to their own club. Things are bad enough without doing that.

I guess I would have to start watching Mickleover, but I don't know if I could be arsed, even though it's only a 15 minute walk to the ground.
I've already pretty much stopped watching any football that doesn't have some impact on / link to Derby so I expect there's every chance I could stop watching it altogether.

I guess I would have to start watching Mickleover, but I don't know if I could be arsed, even though it's only a 15 minute walk to the ground.
I've already pretty much stopped watching any football that doesn't have some impact on / link to Derby so I expect there's every chance I could stop watching it altogether.