![](http://content-eu.invisioncic.com/w325849/set_resources_220/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
curb
-
Posts
2,671 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
curb got a reaction from Ram-Alf in The Administration Thread
Wasn’t it a lorry load of strawberries that caused the jams?
-
curb got a reaction from Adslegend in The Administration Thread
I’m not sure that’s true, most people in Derby/Derbyshire will realise the benefit to the county in keeping the football club going, and securing the stadium so it can’t be used like this again.
It would be more benefit than building a velodrome, how much did that cost?
-
curb got a reaction from Miggins in The Administration Thread
I’m not sure that’s true, most people in Derby/Derbyshire will realise the benefit to the county in keeping the football club going, and securing the stadium so it can’t be used like this again.
It would be more benefit than building a velodrome, how much did that cost?
-
curb got a reaction from r_wilcockson in The Administration Thread
If they buy the stadium, or even get given it, they would still have those running costs.
After all that’s happened with Mad Mel I’d prefer the stadium in the hands of the community anyway, it won’t be so messy then the next time we go bust.
-
curb got a reaction from Curtains in The Administration Thread
If they buy the stadium, or even get given it, they would still have those running costs.
After all that’s happened with Mad Mel I’d prefer the stadium in the hands of the community anyway, it won’t be so messy then the next time we go bust.
-
curb got a reaction from jimtastic56 in The Administration Thread
If they buy the stadium, or even get given it, they would still have those running costs.
After all that’s happened with Mad Mel I’d prefer the stadium in the hands of the community anyway, it won’t be so messy then the next time we go bust.
-
curb got a reaction from jimtastic56 in The Administration Thread
Why would anyone buy us with all that debt and no league membership when they could pick up the pieces without paying the football debts or HMRC?
-
curb got a reaction from therealhantsram in The Administration Thread
If they buy the stadium, or even get given it, they would still have those running costs.
After all that’s happened with Mad Mel I’d prefer the stadium in the hands of the community anyway, it won’t be so messy then the next time we go bust.
-
curb reacted to MaltRam in The Administration Thread
We start again at PPS. Should be a great ride back up and the community still gets the benefit. August kick off at home in National League North? I'm in. 3 season tickets, please.
-
curb got a reaction from Howard Canitbé in The Administration Thread
I’m not sure that’s true, most people in Derby/Derbyshire will realise the benefit to the county in keeping the football club going, and securing the stadium so it can’t be used like this again.
It would be more benefit than building a velodrome, how much did that cost?
-
curb got a reaction from Andicis in The Administration Thread
I’m not sure that’s true, most people in Derby/Derbyshire will realise the benefit to the county in keeping the football club going, and securing the stadium so it can’t be used like this again.
It would be more benefit than building a velodrome, how much did that cost?
-
curb got a reaction from Zag zig in The Administration Thread
I’m not sure that’s true, most people in Derby/Derbyshire will realise the benefit to the county in keeping the football club going, and securing the stadium so it can’t be used like this again.
It would be more benefit than building a velodrome, how much did that cost?
-
curb got a reaction from angieram in The Administration Thread
I’m not sure that’s true, most people in Derby/Derbyshire will realise the benefit to the county in keeping the football club going, and securing the stadium so it can’t be used like this again.
It would be more benefit than building a velodrome, how much did that cost?
-
curb got a reaction from LeedsCityRam in The Administration Thread
I’m not sure that’s true, most people in Derby/Derbyshire will realise the benefit to the county in keeping the football club going, and securing the stadium so it can’t be used like this again.
It would be more benefit than building a velodrome, how much did that cost?
-
curb got a reaction from Carnero in The Administration Thread
I’m not sure that’s true, most people in Derby/Derbyshire will realise the benefit to the county in keeping the football club going, and securing the stadium so it can’t be used like this again.
It would be more benefit than building a velodrome, how much did that cost?
-
curb got a reaction from GenBr in The Administration Thread
I’m not sure that’s true, most people in Derby/Derbyshire will realise the benefit to the county in keeping the football club going, and securing the stadium so it can’t be used like this again.
It would be more benefit than building a velodrome, how much did that cost?
-
curb got a reaction from TheresOnlyWanChope in The Administration Thread
I’m not sure that’s true, most people in Derby/Derbyshire will realise the benefit to the county in keeping the football club going, and securing the stadium so it can’t be used like this again.
It would be more benefit than building a velodrome, how much did that cost?
-
curb got a reaction from r_wilcockson in The Administration Thread
I’m not sure that’s true, most people in Derby/Derbyshire will realise the benefit to the county in keeping the football club going, and securing the stadium so it can’t be used like this again.
It would be more benefit than building a velodrome, how much did that cost?
-
curb reacted to Tyler Durden in The Administration Thread
Which the potential bidders would be patently aware of anyway.
We're sitting ducks atm at the pure whim of random business people whom may or may not decide to up their interest in us.
-
curb got a reaction from jimtastic56 in The Administration Thread
Because if whoever is bidding for the club is not offering enough to pay football creditors and HMRC, so not satisfying the EFL to keep the league membership, then the bid is effectively worthless. They may as well wait and start up a new company and buy the name and history.
-
curb got a reaction from RipleyRich in The Administration Thread
They’re not, as has been said many times, their job is to try and get the best deal for the creditors, which means selling it for the highest price possible.
But there is a minimum limit, set by the EFL, who won’t allow us to stay in the league without paying 100% to football creditors, a percentage that HMRC will accept, and a percentage to all other creditors, so they will have an absolute minimum figure that if a buyer isn’t prepare to pay then the club will be kicked out the league.
The second limit is the other creditors, which if the buyer doesn’t meet we get a points deduction next season, which isn’t quite as bad as liquidation, but makes it harder for us to recover, which in turn makes it less attractive for potential buyers, which in turn forces the value of the club down (a catch 22).
So according to the latest quantuma statement no buyer has so far come forward with a high enough bid to satisfy the first limit.
-
curb got a reaction from Carl Sagan in The Administration Thread
They’re not, as has been said many times, their job is to try and get the best deal for the creditors, which means selling it for the highest price possible.
But there is a minimum limit, set by the EFL, who won’t allow us to stay in the league without paying 100% to football creditors, a percentage that HMRC will accept, and a percentage to all other creditors, so they will have an absolute minimum figure that if a buyer isn’t prepare to pay then the club will be kicked out the league.
The second limit is the other creditors, which if the buyer doesn’t meet we get a points deduction next season, which isn’t quite as bad as liquidation, but makes it harder for us to recover, which in turn makes it less attractive for potential buyers, which in turn forces the value of the club down (a catch 22).
So according to the latest quantuma statement no buyer has so far come forward with a high enough bid to satisfy the first limit.
-
curb got a reaction from atherstoneram in The Administration Thread
They’re not, as has been said many times, their job is to try and get the best deal for the creditors, which means selling it for the highest price possible.
But there is a minimum limit, set by the EFL, who won’t allow us to stay in the league without paying 100% to football creditors, a percentage that HMRC will accept, and a percentage to all other creditors, so they will have an absolute minimum figure that if a buyer isn’t prepare to pay then the club will be kicked out the league.
The second limit is the other creditors, which if the buyer doesn’t meet we get a points deduction next season, which isn’t quite as bad as liquidation, but makes it harder for us to recover, which in turn makes it less attractive for potential buyers, which in turn forces the value of the club down (a catch 22).
So according to the latest quantuma statement no buyer has so far come forward with a high enough bid to satisfy the first limit.
-
curb got a reaction from jono in The Administration Thread
I was wondering if Don Amott would be considering that is well, it’s an opportunity for them to boost their fan base considerably.
They’d have to change colours though.
-
curb got a reaction from RadioactiveWaste in The Administration Thread
1 MM will say he lost more than enough chasing the dream
2 HMRC will say they’ve made an example of us to discourage other clubs thinking they can get away with it.
3 MSD will write it off as a bad loss
4 Administrators will say it was an impossible situation.
5 EFL will say they gave us enough time
6 Football as a whole will mourn for ten minutes before fixating on another headline, an England player being booed or something equally trivial.
7 We’ll be devastated but nobody will give a poo until it happens to them.