sage Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Two questions Who have we signed post NC who is worth more now than we signed them for? and... Who at Derby has gone on to play at the same or higher level after leaving us in the last 10 years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbo jones Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 No one. hendrick...I'm struggling already Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbo jones Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Actually Ince could possibly be worth more, all depends on if there's a buyer and how much they're willing to spend though. Thorne would be if it wasn't for the injuries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsnip Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 18 minutes ago, jimbo jones said: No one. hendrick...I'm struggling already Not post clough though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mostyn6 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 all the pre Post-Clough signings are perhaps only worth more since Clough left. Albentosa was a profit. Christie would sell for more than we paid. Ince too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waffle Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Christie, Pearce and Thorne. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van der MoodHoover Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Camara Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Possibly Carson as I believe the fee for him was quite low. I think inflation will cover Camara and Weimann. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Sagan Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 We seemed to do OK with the Albentosa deal. Also, there appeared to be a reasonable amount of interest over Camara from French teams in January. Perhaps the moral is to buy relatively inexpensively oversea? Carson would command a decent profit and could play Premier League no problem. Pearce we got on a free and could be sold for profit. Ince would likely sell for a profit too. Bent is too old to sell. We would probably lose money on Johnson, Butterfield, Vydra, Blackman, Shackell, Anya, Nugent. I've probably missed lots. That's a 5:7 split so not as bad as you might expect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbo jones Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 How much did we pay for Christie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van der MoodHoover Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Just now, jimbo jones said: How much did we pay for Christie? Thought was about 700k? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted March 8, 2017 Author Share Posted March 8, 2017 27 minutes ago, Mostyn6 said: all the pre Post-Clough signings are perhaps only worth more since Clough left. Albentosa was a profit. Christie would sell for more than we paid. Ince too. Very much doubt it. Ince is the only one i can think of. What I would also add is this is at a time off massively inflated fees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted March 8, 2017 Author Share Posted March 8, 2017 21 minutes ago, Carl Sagan said: We seemed to do OK with the Albentosa deal. Also, there appeared to be a reasonable amount of interest over Camara from French teams in January. Perhaps the moral is to buy relatively inexpensively oversea? Carson would command a decent profit and could play Premier League no problem. Pearce we got on a free and could be sold for profit. Ince would likely sell for a profit too. Bent is too old to sell. We would probably lose money on Johnson, Butterfield, Vydra, Blackman, Shackell, Anya, Nugent. I've probably missed lots. That's a 5:7 split so not as bad as you might expect. Obviously you would make a profit on free transfers mid contract. Christie is out of contract in the summer so is worth £0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Millenniumram Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Ince will be worth shedloads more, Carson too. Beyond that you'd get something for Pearce, maybe slightly more for butterfield as well. Camara you'd probably get your money back on, Olsson maybe worth a little more too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G STAR RAM Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 A player is worth what someone will pay for them so it's impossible to answer the OP. For instance would anyone have said Vydra was worth £8m? I doubt it but that is what we were willing to pay for him. In an inflated market we could feasibly recoup our money on most players with probably the exception of Blackman (due to not playing) and Shackell (due to age). If the question is more aimed towards which players have improved as footballers with us then the answer is probably nobody. Players that have played at the same level, well there's quite a few, at a higher level only Hendrick comes to mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkle Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Players worth a lot more than our purchase price in my opinion Ince Keogh Russell Martin Christie players who have gone on to premiership level i.e. Selected every week Hendrick and Grant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mostyn6 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 55 minutes ago, sage said: Obviously you would make a profit on free transfers mid contract. Christie is out of contract in the summer so is worth £0. he isn't worth £0, he will just cost zero. You cannot have it both ways. If we cannot have incoming freebies as a progression, then you cannot say that someone leaving for free is worthless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuwtfly Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 1 hour ago, sage said: Who have we signed post NC who is worth more now than we signed them for? Carson, Christie, Thorne (possibly) and Ince? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted March 8, 2017 Author Share Posted March 8, 2017 3 hours ago, Mostyn6 said: he isn't worth £0, he will just cost zero. You cannot have it both ways. If we cannot have incoming freebies as a progression, then you cannot say that someone leaving for free is worthless. Which way do you want it? Ooer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Ramalot Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 4 hours ago, sage said: Obviously you would make a profit on free transfers mid contract. Christie is out of contract in the summer so is worth £0. Christie is only a free if dcfc do not take up the option of a year..... therefore there is a sum.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.