Duracell Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 That's literally the worst thing I've ever read/heard.That post can only come from a man who didn't see my previous Taylor Swift suggestions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Scarlet Pimpernel Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 Never mind the songs. When is he signing on the dotted line? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RLACML Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 For all you know, that large gentleman could turn out to be a well refined lady. Gotta keep an open mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RLACML Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 That post can only come from a man who didn't see my previous Taylor Swift suggestions.Or any of b4's cracking suggestions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i-Ram Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 For all you know, that large gentleman could turn out to be a well refined lady. Gotta keep an open mindYou have Rob; you are always welcome to a night down in Brighton to broaden the mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kernow Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 If all of our 'targets' come in we'd be left with a bloody good squad! Possible first XI of...CarsonLowton Keogh/Pearce Shackell ForsythHughes ThorneInce Martin WeimannBentUnsure whether we'd start with 4 out of our back 5 as summer arrivals. If Shackell comes I'd like to see a centre back gone. One gone would be enough as we'd have Pearce and Shackell plus two of Buxton, Keogh & Albentosa. 4 players for two spots. Loan Rawson out to a Champ side to get a whole season of football under his belt (hopefully the paperwork is done right.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shuff264 Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 If all of our 'targets' come in we'd be left with a bloody good squad! Possible first XI of...CarsonLowton Keogh/Pearce Shackell ForsythHughes ThorneInce Martin WeimannBentUnsure whether we'd start with 4 out of our back 5 as summer arrivals. If Shackell comes I'd like to see a centre back gone. One gone would be enough as we'd have Pearce and Shackell plus two of Buxton, Keogh & Albentosa. 4 players for two spots. Loan Rawson out to a Champ side to get a whole season of football under his belt (hopefully the paperwork is done right.)If another person puts Martin in CAM I might just go insane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheron85 Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 If another person puts Martin in CAM I might just go insane.I always find in sensible to play your target man in an attacking midfield role too... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kernow Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 If another person puts Martin in CAM I might just go insane.Hardly CAM. It's the way you would line him up if you were to write it on a forum but that wouldn't be his role of course. He would be just behind Bent for me. Would give us more of a threat. Martin and Bryson were superb in 13/14 due to Bryson's runs beyond Martin, so to have a natural finisher like Bent making runs in an already advanced position should be a big threat for the opposition.We haven't seen much of Martin & Bent together when both fully fit so we're all unsure how they'd work together but I'm confident it wouldn't be much of a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDeadlySaul Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 Hardly CAM. It's the way you would line him up if you were to write it on a forum but that wouldn't be his role of course. He would be just behind Bent for me. Would give us more of a threat. Martin and Bryson were superb in 13/14 due to Bryson's runs beyond Martin, so to have a natural finisher like Bent making runs in an already advanced position should be a big threat for the opposition.We haven't seen much of Martin & Bent together when both fully fit so we're all unsure how they'd work together but I'm confident it wouldn't be much of a problem.Isn't that just a 4-2-4 if Martin and Bent play together Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kernow Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 I always find in sensible to play your target man in an attacking midfield role too...Read my reply Batman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kernow Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 Isn't that just a 4-2-4 if Martin and Bent play together Not necessarily. Formations are complicated, as for example when we play 4-3-3 we don't stick to that rigid shape all game. It depends on who has the ball, where the ball is, who has momentum etc.When attacking we could end up with a sort of 4-2-4 yes, if we're playing a weaker side or already a couple up that could be a 4-1-1-4 if we're being technical.I think a 4-2-3-1 would suit us. Two wide forwards but not as advanced as last season as we'd essentially have a man less in midfield. Martin wouldn't be the typical CAM as some have chosen to say I meant. But I think we'd be more of a threat if Martin and Bent worked off each other in a better way than a flat two strikers side by side.Hopefully what I'm trying to say makes sense. Internet abroad is shitty so writing a proper post is challenging. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shuff264 Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 Hardly CAM. It's the way you would line him up if you were to write it on a forum but that wouldn't be his role of course. He would be just behind Bent for me. Would give us more of a threat. Martin and Bryson were superb in 13/14 due to Bryson's runs beyond Martin, so to have a natural finisher like Bent making runs in an already advanced position should be a big threat for the opposition.We haven't seen much of Martin & Bent together when both fully fit so we're all unsure how they'd work together but I'm confident it wouldn't be much of a problem.Id say we wont see them start together all that much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthernRam Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 I just want to know - has he signed yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheron85 Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 Read my reply Batman.I did... it made my eyes bleed... and not in a good way... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-JW- Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 I just want to know - has he signed yet?I'm predicting he will sign on Wednesday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i-Ram Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 Shouldn't we just keep on buying at the moment and not put them into any particular order? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sexydadbod Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 CarsonNew right back Keogh Shackell Forsyth Thorne HughesWeimann Ince Russell MartinI think that team could win the league. Potentially signing our rival's players is another bonus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDeadlySaul Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 Not necessarily. Formations are complicated, as for example when we play 4-3-3 we don't stick to that rigid shape all game. It depends on who has the ball, where the ball is, who has momentum etc.When attacking we could end up with a sort of 4-2-4 yes, if we're playing a weaker side or already a couple up that could be a 4-1-1-4 if we're being technical.I think a 4-2-3-1 would suit us. Two wide forwards but not as advanced as last season as we'd essentially have a man less in midfield. Martin wouldn't be the typical CAM as some have chosen to say I meant. But I think we'd be more of a threat if Martin and Bent worked off each other in a better way than a flat two strikers side by side.Hopefully what I'm trying to say makes sense. Internet abroad is shitty so writing a proper post is challenging.The thing I like about the 4-2-3-1 is that it adds more options for a plan B.With the 4-3-3 we relied heavily on certain players like Martin, but in a 4-2-3-1 we don't have to, if we need to change a game plan you have options like Bryson and Dawkins to put into the CAM role and you can also put Weimann and Russell upfront as in a 4-3-3 they wouldn't really work in that lone forward role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mostyn6 Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 Picture yourself on the pitch at the iPro.. Something something something...Incey in the side with Weimann Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.