uttoxram75 Posted February 15, 2015 Share Posted February 15, 2015 Are yoga pants a threat to public decency? It might seem so after the beloved athletic wear once again made headlines - this time after a lawmaker debating public decency said the pants "should be illegal". Yoga pants, as they are called in the US, or leggings, are a current fashion staple for women who are either into yoga or want to look athletic while running errands. They're soft and stretchy, but also form-fitting. In 2014 denim sales fell 6% as the growing trend of "athleisure" encouraged more women to reach for comfortable leggings instead of skinny jeans. According to Anu Hastings with the product database Inix, over 2,700 types of so-called "yoga pants" are now available on the market. With the increased exposure (in more ways than one) has come increased controversy. Montana lawmaker David "Doc" Moore received national attention this past Wednesday when he proposed a bill aimed at bolstering the states indecent exposure laws. He was prompted after a nude bike ride in Missoula, Montana, made clear that the indecent exposure laws in the city were, well, bare. "http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/81002000/jpg/_81002808_463285920-1" alt="_81002808_463285920-1"> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uttoxram75 Posted February 15, 2015 Author Share Posted February 15, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-JW- Posted February 15, 2015 Share Posted February 15, 2015 Oh god, we're gonna get shut down now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmericanRam Posted February 15, 2015 Share Posted February 15, 2015 I think if women want to wear them,its their business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrivateDerby Posted February 15, 2015 Share Posted February 15, 2015 There's a lady that's gotta be in her late 40s early 50s that does boxercise at my gym, fantastic figure but wears them all the time. Had a quick round of who would, 3 to 10 in favour of... Obviously I voted for but the others were convinced it'd be bad without them pants. The law maker may have a point, maybe we're getting tricked? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cisse Posted February 15, 2015 Share Posted February 15, 2015 I don't think there is nothing wrong or special in those pants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gypsy Ram Posted February 15, 2015 Share Posted February 15, 2015 They are very comfortable to wear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cisse Posted February 15, 2015 Share Posted February 15, 2015 The idea behind banning these pants is that men want to stare these womens asses as they were these pants. Well men stare those asses anyway so nothing changes even if they were banned. So why not concentrate on more serious causes because God knows there are plenty of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozza Posted February 15, 2015 Share Posted February 15, 2015 Funny this , they're advertising these on Film Four right now , selling them in 'The Range' for a limited period only , there's gonna be some weird and wonderful sights in Burton , soon .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mostyn6 Posted February 15, 2015 Share Posted February 15, 2015 they're indecent on anyone under the age of 16 and they're offensive on anyone over the weight of 14 stone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted February 15, 2015 Share Posted February 15, 2015 they're indecent on anyone under the age of 16 and they're offensive on anyone over the weight of 14 stone.you're a bit generous there mate. I'd knock it down 2 stone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shuff264 Posted February 15, 2015 Share Posted February 15, 2015 All the eyes are on me when I wear them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimmu Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 We could just merge this thread with old pervs... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewe Ram Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 I saw a pic of a big lass wearing beige ones. Now that was offensive, you had to look intently to make sure she actually had some on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 There needs to be an age and size limit on them... A bit like fags and booze. Too fat? No, you're not having them. Too old? Nobody wants to see your moose knuckle, you're not having them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 Moose knuckle? Well, that's a new one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 Moose knuckle? Well, that's a new one. Think twice that of a camel toe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrsRam Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 Children, drunk people and leggings always tell the truth... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LesterRam Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 camel toe !!! not a good look Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.