inter politics Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 Good start... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shuff264 Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 And it all comes tumbling down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 Ta. Just a fiver A Wicket off first ball 25-1, hindsight is a great thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cardifframs Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 Wahey! Broad hits a six! England tail flying along :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 Standing your ground when given not out is one thing, but reviewing when you've hit the damn thing is just classless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 Standing your ground when given not out is one thing, but reviewing when you've hit the damn thing is just classless. Who you talking about uncle? Broad or the end of the last test?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 Who you talking about uncle?Broad or the end of the last test??I do not see how anyone could possibly need clarification on that statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCFCfranco Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 Thought will Hughes would be at Bristol, not lords. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inter politics Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 Great timing...well done Bresnan. Watson must be frustrating for Aussies - never really contributes the big score. Daft decision to review. Rogers as much to blame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 I do not see how anyone could possibly need clarification on that statement. What is the difference between an Aussie that hit the ball reviewing, compared to broad? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 One's Australian, the other one's a Forest fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 What is the difference between an Aussie that hit the ball reviewing, compared to broad?Haddin wasn't the one that reviewed. England had a speculative review after Haddin was given not out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 Pretty funny that another bad Aussie review has lead to them not using it for Rogers.... because that would have been overturned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 Haddin wasn't the one that reviewed. England had a speculative review after Haddin was given not out. wasnt on about haddin; unless my memory is going was it not the aussie captain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 Glad the 3rd umpire stayed with the original call on Hughes. If there was an edge, it was the faintest of faintest, but there's no way he could have said with 100% certainty there wasn't a touch on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 wasnt on about haddin; unless my memory is going was it not the aussie captain?Why would the Aussie captain review a decision given not out? The captain also can't review when he's in the dressing room. So yes, your memory is going. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 Why would the Aussie captain review a decision given not out? The captain also can't review when he's in the dressing room. So yes, your memory is going. If the Aussie captain is batting of course he can review it if he is given out, broad bowled, Clarke hit it, prior caught it, and I remember they looked if it carried and gave him out. I'm sure he then reviewed it ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rynny Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 Standing your ground when given not out is one thing, but reviewing when you've hit the damn thing is just classless.Your response is the exact reason he did it, get under the skins of the opponents. Also a review left, last wicket, might as well take it, you may get lucky. Also Leeds is on about Clarke from the first test, 2nd innings when he reviewed a caught behind after he hit it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 If the Aussie captain is batting of course he can review it if he is given out, broad bowled, Clarke hit it, prior caught it, and I remember they looked if it carried and gave him out. I'm sure he then reviewed it ?So we've changed topic to the last test now? Another one of those odd feather touches. Clarke probably didn't feel it and didn't think he hit it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 Your response is the exact reason he did it, get under the skins of the opponents. Also a review left, last wicket, might as well take it, you may get lucky.Also Leeds is on about Clarke from the first test, 2nd innings when he reviewed a caught behind after he hit it....and that's the exact reason the reviews should never have been given to the players in the first place. The idea of a tactical review is sickening. It's time wasting most of the time, and little more than a pathetic last ditch shot sometimes, and something the game could really do without.Yeah, I realised the decision he was starting to talk about, it's odd that he went back to that one after initially talking about Haddin. I honestly doubt Clarke would have even felt that touch though, it was the merest of feathers through. Broad on the other hand was just having a stab today, should have just gone quietly....also, doing it to "get under the skins of the opponents" is basically saying he is being a unsportsmanlike git. Doing things to windup players is not a get out of gaol free card, just ask Harbhajan Singh about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.