cannable Posted September 7, 2013 Share Posted September 7, 2013 Futhead's down for me. Can somebody post the ratings please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shuff264 Posted September 7, 2013 Share Posted September 7, 2013 "8b4b02ea69054206423762836766cb61" alt="8b4b02ea69054206423762836766cb61"> "2be87059e1d15be3523079684ef9146e" alt="2be87059e1d15be3523079684ef9146e"> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannable Posted September 7, 2013 Share Posted September 7, 2013 Cheers bud. I'm sorry but if Zaha has 81 dribbling Hughes needs the same at least. Martin needs about 60 passing. Hendrick's shooting should be about 65. Grant's kicking should be and his positioning about 70. Who actually reviews Derby for FIFA? It's like they haven't got a clue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shuff264 Posted September 7, 2013 Share Posted September 7, 2013 Just some poor student who is hungover and desperate for a job Never going to be accurate, could see Wards going up if he keeps playing internationally Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannable Posted September 7, 2013 Share Posted September 7, 2013 The thing is literally anybody can apply to do FIFA's ratings. I applied to review the data for Derby the other day anyway, so hopefully they get back to me. By the looks of things they need to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCFC_17 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 The thing is literally anybody can apply to do FIFA's ratings. I applied to review the data for Derby the other day anyway, so hopefully they get back to me. By the looks of things they need to if they do get back to you, tell em to sort out hughes' rating Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannable Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 if they do get back to you, tell em to sort out hughes' rating They said it would be another 2-3 weeks before they inform me whether I've got it, so we're stuck with a 68 Hughes on Ultimate Team. I'll see what I can do about normal FIFA though. I had a quick mess around earlier on what I think his stats should be and he ended up a 72. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott129 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 Martin, Hughes, Freeman and Grant should be a bit higher. Perhaps 70, 71, 66 & 70 respectively. Coutts and Jacobs should be knocked down to 67 and Bavies shouldn't be any higher than 65. In my opinion, of course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leicester Ram Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 Hendrick, Hughes, Grant and Martin are just a joke. Knew Bryson would be the best rated CM again even though he's nowhere near the class of Hendrick and Hughes. Also, where the **** has Wardy 64 heading come from?! 5 foot 5 Jamie Ward is only 4 points worse at heading than Robin Van Persie. Makes complete sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trekkie_ram Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 What's the career mode like this year? Do you actually get any satisfaction from it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leicester Ram Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 Just noticed, how has O'Brien warranted a overall increase of 2, but Hendrick only 1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott129 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 What's the career mode like this year? Do you actually get any satisfaction from it? It sounds a lot better, according to this... http://news.futhead.com/posts/fifa-14/25505-fifa-14-career-mode-the-new-features Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DcfcNews12 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 Saw on the Futhead a comment saying that Martin might be upgraded to a 71 similar stats but better overall. Smith should be 69/70 and Freeman should be 65/66 IMO stats below Grant-72 Very experienced keeper and well in his peak.Should have never been a 65 last year. Smith-69 Tottenham Loanee did well at Millwall on loan and for England u21s + got a new deal. Keogh-71 Correct stats.Cant complain but pace should of been around the same. Buxton-67 Correct has improved but still not a top centre back. Forsyth-67 an upgrade of just 1 i think he is nowhere the best in the league but steady Freeman-66 He showed last season he can play at this level and has improved. Hoganson-63 He is progressing nicely not yet a championship regualr but can get there.Pace should be 77-80 Ward-72 Correct if had played all season he could have a 73/74 missed too many matches though Jacobs-69-Correct The Lad is very talented and if he had moved here sooner could have been an u21 international Hendrick-71 He is still very young yet a Full international and got 2 assists at that level. Stats are okay though. Hughes-70 He is one of the countrys top talents and should be ranked higher.He is highlighted by other teams before games. Bryson-70 Correct Same level of performances as previous season but yet to break into the international side (not his fault) Coutts-69 Correct I think he gets too much stick saying hes a cm paying rm. good player but needs to add goals. Eutace-65 I think hes more of a utility player and the on card stats are good bar the pace. Davies-68 He still has somthing to offer i feel and very good set pieces that can change games. Russell-71 I think he needs time to adapt but is alot better than previous strikers and i expect and In form card hopefully Martin-72 He was unfit and hadnt been shown faith for ages.Brilliant start and our main striker so the overalls should show that. Sammon-69 He didnt have best of seasons scoring wise but he was never a goal scorer anyway.a Call up to ireland is good Bennett-63 He should have much higher pace his main attribute and has also increased in size.Very good young player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted September 9, 2013 Share Posted September 9, 2013 Looking through the stats has been interesting to say the least! My favourite 3 by far... Chris Martin is 43 for passing (the worst in the side by a long long way) Johnny Russell 73 heading... Chris Martin 65 I don't know how you could watch a derby match and come to this conclusion? Poor Old Hoganson has 29 for his shooting ability.. now, haven't seen much of him admitted but I know from what I remember he has a peach of a left foot! I'm going to go through it tomorrow, and hopefully put together a much more well thought-out version.. but needless to say, some questionable ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alph Posted September 9, 2013 Share Posted September 9, 2013 OB is better at passing than Chris Martin. Refund!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted September 9, 2013 Share Posted September 9, 2013 OB is better at passing than Chris Martin. Refund!!!! By more than 10 points better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
May Contain Nuts Posted September 9, 2013 Share Posted September 9, 2013 Seems I'm always picking on Keogh - no way should he have a rating anything above 69! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott129 Posted September 9, 2013 Share Posted September 9, 2013 Looking through the stats has been interesting to say the least! My favourite 3 by far... Chris Martin is 43 for passing (the worst in the side by a long long way) Johnny Russell 73 heading... Chris Martin 65 I don't know how you could watch a derby match and come to this conclusion? Poor Old Hoganson has 29 for his shooting ability.. now, haven't seen much of him admitted but I know from what I remember he has a peach of a left foot! I'm going to go through it tomorrow, and hopefully put together a much more well thought-out version.. but needless to say, some questionable ones. Tbf, Russell's a very good header of the ball. We just haven't seen it yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaddesdenRam Posted September 9, 2013 Share Posted September 9, 2013 Russell - 72 Martin - 70 Ward - 70 Hendrick - 69 Hughes - 70 Coutts - 68 Forsyth - 65 Barker - 71 Keogh - 69 Smith - 69 Grant - 70 Would be my ratings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted September 9, 2013 Share Posted September 9, 2013 Tbf, Russell's a very good header of the ball. We just haven't seen it yet. No I know that, but Martin is much stronger in the air.. anyway, here is the FUT team ratings.. PAC DRI SHO DEF PAS HEA Russell 87 74 63 45 60 73 Martin 69 65 70 48 43 65 Sammon 81 58 61 50 51 72 Bennett 73 65 56 51 54 57 Ward 78 76 68 57 63 64 Bryson 73 68 63 67 66 62 Coutts 74 69 62 60 70 61 Hendrick 67 65 59 68 68 65 Jacobs 74 73 59 48 65 42 Hughes 68 70 45 64 71 58 Bavies 65 69 67 60 64 62 Eustace 52 61 64 70 67 70 Bailey 68 65 50 65 65 60 Barker 58 48 45 73 59 77 Keogh 70 60 31 71 64 73 O'Brien 56 51 36 68 51 70 Buxton 54 35 36 65 54 79 Smith 73 67 53 66 65 52 Forsyth 65 64 61 66 64 76 Freeman 68 57 46 61 56 62 Hoganson 68 52 29 60 59 62 and here is what I would rate them at... PAC DRI SHO DEF PAS HEA Russell 83 74 74 50 68 68 Martin 64 60 70 52 70 73 Sammon 80 60 58 57 60 60 Bennett 80 66 59 50 58 58 Ward 80 76 72 52 65 64 Bryson 73 67 64 64 70 62 Coutts 70 69 60 68 66 64 Hendrick 71 71 68 70 72 67 Jacobs 75 74 66 48 68 58 Hughes 71 75 61 70 77 70 Bavies 65 65 64 65 69 60 Eustace 63 62 58 70 69 64 Bailey 65 62 57 67 67 62 Barker 58 48 40 75 50 80 Keogh 70 65 45 70 55 73 O'Brien 63 54 36 68 45 72 Buxton 53 35 35 72 58 79 Smith 73 67 63 66 65 64 Forsyth 60 60 60 69 60 76 Freeman 68 61 50 67 64 66 Hoganson 70 61 50 60 62 55 not THAT much difference in terms of numbers, knocking a few down and a few up...etc but much much much more representative (for me) Don't quite know what happened there... (edited it) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.