GboroRam

ftfy 👍

Isn't the courts decision that he's paying exactly the right amount of tax? 

I agree. The BBC shouldn't have forced them into this position. The government shouldn't allow these loopholes.  

It's almost like you have a grudge for some reason

I don’t know about them, have they been employed by the same bank for 30 years? I doubt it. And they aren’ t being funded by licence payers. 

That's one lesson we've never learned as a club.
A period of stability is invariably followed by a new chairman who says, in best Michael Caine voice, "I've got an idea" - just as the rear wheels of the bus slide off the edge of the cliff.

Do you honestly believe that? 
I have 5 boys aged between 9 and 13, and I can honestly say I think schools do a far, far better job protecting children than they did in the 80s. Bullying, abuse and horrific behaviour was rife throughout my childhood. And nobody cared and nobody acted upon it. 

Fck me, I wish we were as brave as the French who have taken to the streets to fight their government plans to extend pension age.
We'd thank our government for allowing us to work until we drop and fight each other about made up bollox.

Is @Boycie corgi registered as well as being a sparky? Wow he's multi talented that guy. 😉

Do you love some moderators more than others?
Asking for @DarkFruitsRam7?

It was mainly used to describe the Jewish and Marxist press before 1934. After, obviously, the "left wing national socialists" (rolling eye emoji) shot all the trots and Jews, or sent them to Birkenau. 

Do you honestly believe that? 
I have 5 boys aged between 9 and 13, and I can honestly say I think schools do a far, far better job protecting children than they did in the 80s. Bullying, abuse and horrific behaviour was rife throughout my childhood. And nobody cared and nobody acted upon it. 

Do you honestly believe that? 
I have 5 boys aged between 9 and 13, and I can honestly say I think schools do a far, far better job protecting children than they did in the 80s. Bullying, abuse and horrific behaviour was rife throughout my childhood. And nobody cared and nobody acted upon it. 

Many people on here and in society talk about MSM mainstream media.
The first person to use this phrase, to pour scorn on mainstream media, to follow a specific sector of media instead was...
Josef Goebbels
Quite possibly in 1930s Germany 

At least it confirms you're not a Forest fan.
#onlyfivetoes

Absolutely agree with the middle and last part. It won’t stop, but putting in real/useful policy that actually makes a difference will help curb it. Not window dressing that probably won’t even make it into law, just to try and impress people.
As I said further back, people want an easy answer that tells them what they want to believe. But they don’t look at the detail. 
Sunak and Bravermans new bill will be lucky to make it into law before the election without lots of amendments, if it ever does make it.
So everyone is going to have to wait even longer, for something to be done.
No one is looking at the bigger picture.

Ok fair enough mate. I accept it's just a coincidence that all the things you are furious* about are the things that the media and these organised groups are happily weaponising for financial gain in these so called culture wars. You're not being played at all
*you DO seen furious..you've posted two massive semi-coherent rants above since I last looked at my phone yesterday. 

There are some stats there yes, but I would suggest the way those stats are reported are slightly biased. As usual, this independent think tank doesn't tell you who funds.
"A population the size of a city – at least 88,087 people – have been disclosed as coming uninvited by boat since 1 January 2018."
Another way of writing that is since 2018, only 88k people have come to the uk, which is 0.13% of the UK population and the same amout as one match at Wembley stadium. 2.6m people have died in the uk in the same time period.
In the first paragraph after the stats, they mention tube bombings.
I'm not disagreeing with their stats, but their presentation of them is clearly highly biased. Especially in the context that everyone now knows we hardly take in any refugees vs other similar countries to us.
 

277,000 of those 500,000 are students to whom we actively promote ourselves as a destination of choice.
A lot of them stay on to be our future doctors, scientists etc. 
Source: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/internationalmigration/bulletins/longterminternationalmigrationprovisional/yearendingjune2022#reason-for-immigration

I want you in my room.