Mucker1884

Did it get a bit tight for you mate? 
 ?

Some would argue it is... although I suspect a typo?  

Did it get a bit tight for you mate? 
 ?

Did it get a bit tight for you mate? 
 ?

Did it get a bit tight for you mate? 
 ?

I'll be happy if:
A/  I like the shirt enough to fork out for one.
B/  We retain the option to purchase without the sponsor logo.
 
I've limited myself to various training shirts over the past decade or so, in place of actual replicas, as one or both of the above haven't applied.
I think in general, rather than having a dislike of a specific sponsor, most sponsor logo's are just too "in yer face" for my liking... and yes of course I understand why they make them so "stand out"! 
I'm not one for general tee shirts with logos/motifs/designs etc, tbf.

Did it get a bit tight for you mate? 
 ?

I'll be happy if:
A/  I like the shirt enough to fork out for one.
B/  We retain the option to purchase without the sponsor logo.
 
I've limited myself to various training shirts over the past decade or so, in place of actual replicas, as one or both of the above haven't applied.
I think in general, rather than having a dislike of a specific sponsor, most sponsor logo's are just too "in yer face" for my liking... and yes of course I understand why they make them so "stand out"! 
I'm not one for general tee shirts with logos/motifs/designs etc, tbf.

Did it get a bit tight for you mate? 
 ?

From hereon to be known as Leave Buchanan and Nothin' Byrne.
God riddance to them both.  
#This ship ain't sinking! ?

Some would argue it is... although I suspect a typo?  

I'll be happy if:
A/  I like the shirt enough to fork out for one.
B/  We retain the option to purchase without the sponsor logo.
 
I've limited myself to various training shirts over the past decade or so, in place of actual replicas, as one or both of the above haven't applied.
I think in general, rather than having a dislike of a specific sponsor, most sponsor logo's are just too "in yer face" for my liking... and yes of course I understand why they make them so "stand out"! 
I'm not one for general tee shirts with logos/motifs/designs etc, tbf.

Did it get a bit tight for you mate? 
 ?

Did it get a bit tight for you mate? 
 ?

Did it get a bit tight for you mate? 
 ?

From hereon to be known as Leave Buchanan and Nothin' Byrne.
God riddance to them both.  
#This ship ain't sinking! ?

Did it get a bit tight for you mate? 
 ?

Some would argue it is... although I suspect a typo?  

Did it get a bit tight for you mate? 
 ?

Some would argue it is... although I suspect a typo?  

And also on dry land, so not even The Union Jack!  ?

From hereon to be known as Leave Buchanan and Nothin' Byrne.
God riddance to them both.  
#This ship ain't sinking! ?

I'll be happy if:
A/  I like the shirt enough to fork out for one.
B/  We retain the option to purchase without the sponsor logo.
 
I've limited myself to various training shirts over the past decade or so, in place of actual replicas, as one or both of the above haven't applied.
I think in general, rather than having a dislike of a specific sponsor, most sponsor logo's are just too "in yer face" for my liking... and yes of course I understand why they make them so "stand out"! 
I'm not one for general tee shirts with logos/motifs/designs etc, tbf.

Some would argue it is... although I suspect a typo?  

Some would argue it is... although I suspect a typo?