Dartmouth Ram Posted Sunday at 08:02 Share Posted Sunday at 08:02 Finally a concrete link for Daniel Iversen. Norman 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted Sunday at 08:10 Share Posted Sunday at 08:10 If it’s a loan, believe he’s out of contract next summer so that would likely be the long term plan. Derby4Me, Dartmouth Ram, SouthernRam and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inter politics Posted Sunday at 08:18 Share Posted Sunday at 08:18 6 minutes ago, Srg said: If it’s a loan, believe he’s out of contract next summer so that would likely be the long term plan. Will be similar to the CBT deal, as another poster did previously mention Dartmouth Ram 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MackworthRamIsGod Posted Sunday at 08:50 Share Posted Sunday at 08:50 Great signing if true. Dartmouth Ram 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo Ram Posted Sunday at 09:56 Share Posted Sunday at 09:56 1 hour ago, MackworthRamIsGod said: Great signing if true. Can we afford him though 🤔 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted Sunday at 09:58 Share Posted Sunday at 09:58 How much? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddielewis Posted Sunday at 10:04 Share Posted Sunday at 10:04 5 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said: How much? According to capology he's on £20k a week which is very hefty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chesterfield_Ram Posted Sunday at 10:32 Share Posted Sunday at 10:32 (edited) 29 minutes ago, eddielewis said: According to capology he's on £20k a week which is very hefty Wouldn't be my go to if we're having to pay 20k a week for his wages. For the same money I'd rather go with Zander Clark from Hearts. He's supposedly on 2k a week, so we could offer a transfer fee and potentially have money left over if we go into the same pot as Iversen. Edited Sunday at 10:34 by Chesterfield_Ram Magicman and AlvoRam! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddielewis Posted Sunday at 10:55 Share Posted Sunday at 10:55 20 minutes ago, Chesterfield_Ram said: Wouldn't be my go to if we're having to pay 20k a week for his wages. For the same money I'd rather go with Zander Clark from Hearts. He's supposedly on 2k a week, so we could offer a transfer fee and potentially have money left over if we go into the same pot as Iversen. I'm guessing that's what he was on when Leicester were in the Prem and as they have returned his wages have reverted back to that amount. Last season they were probably lower with due to a relegation clause which is common place probably near around half that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram1988 Posted Sunday at 11:27 Share Posted Sunday at 11:27 20k a week is steep. It would all depend on what percentage of his wages we would need to pay for any loan deal. If we could pay 60% ie 12k a week then we may have a deal on our hands. jono and norwichram 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaianoPOTY98 Posted Sunday at 11:58 Share Posted Sunday at 11:58 Surely Mathew Ryan would be a better option if Iversens on 20k, isn’t Ryan on half that? Jaso, Elwood P Dowd and norwichram 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted Sunday at 14:00 Share Posted Sunday at 14:00 1 hour ago, BaianoPOTY98 said: Surely Mathew Ryan would be a better option if Iversens on 20k, isn’t Ryan on half that? I’d imagine that Ryan would cost us more in wages than Iversen, if Iversen has managed to benefit from an underwritten clause in his contract then that’s great for him. It wont factor in what his market value is and ultimately that’s what we will be willing to meet. Ryan, I think, will have a much more competitive market and therefore the figures will be more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram1988 Posted Sunday at 14:28 Share Posted Sunday at 14:28 25 minutes ago, Ambitious said: I’d imagine that Ryan would cost us more in wages than Iversen, if Iversen has managed to benefit from an underwritten clause in his contract then that’s great for him. It wont factor in what his market value is and ultimately that’s what we will be willing to meet. Ryan, I think, will have a much more competitive market and therefore the figures will be more. I feel Iverson and Ryan are of similar levels so it's just who wants to join us without it costing silly money. Iversen with his loan contributions vs Ryan wage demands. jono 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted Sunday at 21:34 Share Posted Sunday at 21:34 7 hours ago, Ram1988 said: I feel Iverson and Ryan are of similar levels so it's just who wants to join us without it costing silly money. Iversen with his loan contributions vs Ryan wage demands. I would disagree, Ryan is much more established and was playing in Europe as recently as last year. He’s also the captain of his national team with close to 100 caps. It’s very likely he retires as the most capped player his country has ever had. Iversen has spent the majority of his career on loan, doing a relatively good job, but never even appeared for his country. He’s not even in the squad now. Ryan is 100% going to be the more established and costly option, with a deeper list of clubs after him certainly in comparison to Iversen. I like Iversen, think he would be a shrewd signing, but Ryan is a much more established player by every metric. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
admira Posted Sunday at 21:41 Share Posted Sunday at 21:41 He was in loan at Rotherham so fits the bill. Eddie 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobdeBilder Posted Sunday at 22:27 Share Posted Sunday at 22:27 45 minutes ago, admira said: He was in loan at Rotherham so fits the bill. Give it a rest ffs. Carl Sagan, Betty Swollocks, Ram-Alf and 3 others 2 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram1988 Posted Sunday at 23:05 Share Posted Sunday at 23:05 1 hour ago, Ambitious said: I would disagree, Ryan is much more established and was playing in Europe as recently as last year. He’s also the captain of his national team with close to 100 caps. It’s very likely he retires as the most capped player his country has ever had. Iversen has spent the majority of his career on loan, doing a relatively good job, but never even appeared for his country. He’s not even in the squad now. Ryan is 100% going to be the more established and costly option, with a deeper list of clubs after him certainly in comparison to Iversen. I like Iversen, think he would be a shrewd signing, but Ryan is a much more established player by every metric. To be fair you are right. Ryan has the higher pedigree both in terms of his club career including his club career and international career. He probably is the better keeper out of the two. I don't they are poles apart though and the decision surely will be made on which we can afford/ leaves money in the pot for other signings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted Monday at 08:07 Share Posted Monday at 08:07 (edited) 9 hours ago, Ram1988 said: To be fair you are right. Ryan has the higher pedigree both in terms of his club career including his club career and international career. He probably is the better keeper out of the two. I don't they are poles apart though and the decision surely will be made on which we can afford/ leaves money in the pot for other signings. You’re absolutely right, as we well know signing the most established, well-known players ultimately don’t always lead to them being the best for the club. We’ve signed a ton of proven, established players in that past who have completely underwhelmed — and we’ve signed a ton of players who not much was expected and have carved out a legacy at the club. Iversen could well be the better choice, but all things being equal then Ryan has a much more proven body of work at higher levels. Edited Monday at 08:07 by Ambitious Ram1988 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabby'sThighs Posted Tuesday at 08:02 Share Posted Tuesday at 08:02 I don't know how realistic either signing would be, but I think we should target players with re-sale value. Iversen is coming up to 27 but would probably be a loan, Mat Ryan is 32. I'd be more inclined to go for Arthur Okonkwo or (stealing from the Rams Talk podcast) Sam Tickle from Wigan. Both 22. Either could go for a lot of money in a couple of seasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabby'sThighs Posted Tuesday at 08:03 Share Posted Tuesday at 08:03 Just now, Gabby'sThighs said: I don't know how realistic either signing would be, but I think we should target players with re-sale value. Iversen is coming up to 27 but would probably be a loan, Mat Ryan is 32. I'd be more inclined to go for Arthur Okonkwo or (stealing from the Rams Talk podcast) Sam Tickle from Wigan. Both 22. Either could go for a lot of money in a couple of seasons. Just this second realised that Okonkwo joined Wrexham a couple of days ago! Did well on loan there last season, one to keep an eye on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now