JAT Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 Any other team and I think we would have stuck him on taken Thorne and gone all out for a win. However I think we were wary of Burnley's tactics and professionalism last night and didn't want to risk a valuable point! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 Think we were hampered by no wing options off the bench, probably put pay to him coming on as we couldn't really change too far from what we were doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thierry Ennui Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 The most annoying thing is that we were one sub from a very natural attacking formation last night. Subbing Weimann for Bent puts Johnson in the position he got 15 goals in last season and gets two strikers into the box. -----------------Cars-------------------Chris----Keogh---Shack-------Foz--Russ----Butter---Thorne---Johns-------------Martin--Bent------------- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ollycutts1982 Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 I think PC is the 'let's not lose' type as oppose to the lets go for a win. It is probably just me but it annoys me leaving 2 back when we have a corner, even though the opposition have everyone back. I would of stuck Bent on last night for the last 20, I think it was made for him. Wiemann was terrible, yes his work rate is impressive but so was Wardys. I just don't see a £2m-£3m player in him. Last night I think we were missing the Ince we saw last season. But let's take the positives last season Boro and Burnley would probably have beat us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanish Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 don't lose to top 6 and take 4 points from the rest gives us 80 points at least Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TroyDyer Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 Where is Dawkins?Weimann was very poor again last night yet there were no options on the bench that could cover his position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duracell Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 The most annoying thing is that we were one sub from a very natural attacking formation last night. Subbing Weimann for Bent puts Johnson in the position he got 15 goals in last season and gets two strikers into the box. -----------------Cars-------------------Chris----Keogh---Shack-------Foz--Russ----Butter---Thorne---Johns-------------Martin--Bent------------- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tombo Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 I think PC is the 'let's not lose' type as oppose to the lets go for a win. It is probably just me but it annoys me leaving 2 back when we have a corner, even though the opposition have everyone back. I would of stuck Bent on last night for the last 20, I think it was made for him. Wiemann was terrible, yes his work rate is impressive but so was Wardys. I just don't see a £2m-£3m player in him. Last night I think we were missing the Ince we saw last season. But let's take the positives last season Boro and Burnley would probably have beat us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bridgford Ram Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 Not sure Bent would have helped last night. It is not that we were creating chances and missing them, more that we struggled to create. If Burnley had him they may well have won that game 2-0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 Not sure Bent would have helped last night. It is not that we were creating chances and missing them, more that we struggled to create. If Burnley had him they may well have won that game 2-0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trevor1946 Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 With Bent being a major signing in the summer, a striker with vast experience,and a top wage earner.And goals being scarce.Just would like a explanation,Why is he not a major player and used more.Seems strange. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MuespachRam Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 With Bent being a major signing in the summer, a striker with vast experience,and a top wage earner.And goals being scarce.Just would like a explanation,Why is he not a major player and used more.Seems strange. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mostyn6 Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 With Bent being a major signing in the summer, a striker with vast experience,and a top wage earner.And goals being scarce.Just would like a explanation,Why is he not a major player and used more.Seems strange. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trevor1946 Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 Maybe because Clement didn't sign him....and Clement has seen enough of him to come to the conclusion that he cannot play upfront with Martin and he believes Martin is better than Bent......just a thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duracell Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 Clement needs to face facts - he got his substitutions wrong last night.0-0 at home to Burnley who are rubbish, and he had Darrent Bent, Kevin Phillips and the bust of Steve Bloomer sat on the bench. Between them they have 806 career goals in 1,704 career appearances and yet Negative Paul didn't put any of them on.Should have taken off Keogh, Shackell and Carson for them three. Goals win you games - not defenders. Basics of football, that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuitYourJibbaJivin Posted September 22, 2015 Share Posted September 22, 2015 Have to agree with some on here, bringing bent on and going 4-4-2 would have been a mistake, the same mistake he made against leeds. We were dominating the game, went to 2 in the middle to bring bent on. Game opened up and allowed leeds back in the game resulting in their winner. We looked very comfortable last night, just wernt creating enough, last thing we needed last night was to go all out and lose 1-0. We're building a run now, need another positive result on Saturday! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.