kevinhectoring

Q were appointed as administrators to the club in September and have spent 9 months rambling 

Q were appointed as administrators to the club in September and have spent 9 months rambling 

What do you think he has to apologise for? 
 

EFL’s motivation should not affect Q’s decision making. The only question is whether EFl involvement is good for the process. I think it is, but that it’s bad for q 

All these puns about stroking, when it seems obvious to me he was using a rowing term, you lot should hang your heads.
All of you's are cox.

We all want a future for Derby County so I’ll make one last point and then let it be as I’m conscious of labouring my point and I appreciate how stressful/frustrating this process and the role of the admins has been for us fans so people are keen to apportion blame and rightly so in some cases.
The part of the EFL statement you’ve quoted still does nothing to prove that Quantuma are not involving the EFL as you and many other fans are claiming, it’s speculation again. Quantuma are not “hiding behind” NDAs, they are legally binding contracts, the legislation around data protection prevents them from sharing the name and data relating to any party exploring the purchase of the club unless that party (not Quantuma) gives consent. Quantuma would be breaking the law and subject to a fine and potential further punishment if they broke those agreements.
If we take what Trevor Birch (CEO of the EFL) has said in his letter to Derby fans groups, Quantuma have given the EFL contact information for the solicitors of the interested parties (something that must have been agreed and consent given for that information to be shared) and those parties have denied to engage with the EFL (again this is evidence of Quantuma engaging with the EFL, not the opposite). I’ve added the pic of that paragraph.
Q have far from covered themselves in glory through this process as I mentioned before, by all means they should be called out on other points, but this specific idea that they are not telling the EFL things just to be difficult is completely unfounded in my view and if anything it has been proven that they are talking to the EFL by the highest positioned member of that organisation and by the fact they communicated the info around CKs bid. 
Anyway, hopefully this is a moot point soon and the club is taken over or at the very least funded for the season pending a takeover and we can get back to on the pitch matters ? 
 

The last EFL statement says: 
‘and the EFL is now to be made a party to all correspondence and discussions between the Administrators, and any and all potential bidders’
It’s a condition to the suspension of withdrawal that q do this. Q have decided not to, spuriously hiding behind NDAs and principles of confidentiality.  So they are further alienating the EFl. 
 
It’s suggested Appleby has refused to accept EFl involvement. I’ll believe that when we have clear evidence of it. I say that because he’s aware of the will of the EFl and I don’t think he’s the sort of man who would disregard it. 
 
Just my opinion, that’s what forums are for ... 

Oh come on. Several posters have explained about the legal implications imposed on Q regarding allowing EFL to have access to bid details. Why do you continue to bang on about Q refusing to allow EFL involvement in the process. It’s up to the bidders if they want to share details with EFL. And please don’t repeat the bit about Q telling bidders they must share bid details with EFL or go. That’s a good way to lose most if not all bidders faced with such an ultimatum.

It seems like you've come up with a solution and convinced yourself that it's guaranteed to produce the result you want, with no thought to the consequences if it doesn't go to plan. 
You're quite dangerously deciding that anyone not willing to comply with the request is not a serious bidder, as if it's black and white.
There probably aren't enough serious bidders at the table to risk laying down the law. If Q did as you suggest and ALL of them responded with a resounding "I'm out" we'd risk being liquidated within the week! 
(and no doubt there would a queue of people calling out what an awful decision it was, and how stupid the administrators must be to have done it) 

............ says who?
 

If you think the EFL could make the administrators come to a quicker outcome you live in a dream world.

Another libellous post the mods choose to overlook. I can prove it’s untrue - that one said his name was Carl 

People keep saying Rooney is quiet but it’s off season - you wouldn’t usually hear from the manager and it’s not really up to him to keep commenting on a situation he isn’t actually privy too.  

Another libellous post the mods choose to overlook. I can prove it’s untrue - that one said his name was Carl 

All speculation isn’t it. What we do know is that at the time of the bids in December the Boro claim was still current. And q said none of the bidders wanted to accept any responsibility for that. And I don’t doubt that. 
 

Another libellous post the mods choose to overlook. I can prove it’s untrue - that one said his name was Carl 

There are suggestions Ashley has tried to force q to reduce fees - that might have been a reason he was derailed 
Also quite possible that Stretford and Rooney somehow forced q to re-open discussions with CK. (it’s notable how little we have heard from Rooney)
We’re now in the position where Q’s unpaid fees are so high they themselves have a conflict in continuing to act 

There are suggestions Ashley has tried to force q to reduce fees - that might have been a reason he was derailed 
Also quite possible that Stretford and Rooney somehow forced q to re-open discussions with CK. (it’s notable how little we have heard from Rooney)
We’re now in the position where Q’s unpaid fees are so high they themselves have a conflict in continuing to act 

There are suggestions Ashley has tried to force q to reduce fees - that might have been a reason he was derailed 
Also quite possible that Stretford and Rooney somehow forced q to re-open discussions with CK. (it’s notable how little we have heard from Rooney)
We’re now in the position where Q’s unpaid fees are so high they themselves have a conflict in continuing to act 

Not posted on since the good old days.  But for the first time today I am very worried about my derby county, I have followed them since I came to live here in 1974 and the only engment  I had was through the rams , myself and my late father and brother all derby through and through,  I'm the only one left now 
And if this was taken away from me 
It will finsh me.  So I pray ?
Please please save this great club 

Very true .
or the Exeter or Dolphin or Silk Mill or Seven Stars.  
 
oh I’m on one now 

I always wondered why Moses didn't turn the tablets over.....

Q are defying the wishes of the EFL without regard for the ramifications 

Q have reduced us to a ramshackle club 

So we bringing Shackell out of retirement?