maxjam

I'm absolutely certain that the good people at Pfizer are desperate to release the information this instant. If only the dastardly FDA would let them.
Pfizer are very confident in their test results. They must be, since they refused to let the Indian government test their vaccine. https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-india-pfizer-idUSKBN2A50GE

Yes it was the FDA that wanted 75yrs to release the data.  I think the Pfizer 'confusion' comes from sloppy headlines or comments - such as the one I made tbf.  Rather than explain what the FDA is and the difference its just easier to gloss over 'pfizer docs' and '75yrs' as ultimately those are the documents we want to see.  Regardless of the who and the why, in the interests of full transparency the documents should have been made available a long time ago.
As for FDA funding and corruption, how far down the rabbit hole do you want to go? The following USA Today article states that 
'Based on our research, we rate PARTLY FALSE the claim a majority of the FDA's budget comes from companies it regulates'
but goes on to state that Pfizer et al 
'do comprise a majority of the funding for the subsection of the agency that handles drug approvals'
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/08/27/fact-check-some-fdas-budget-does-come-industry-funding/5572076001/
There is another good article here re. conflicts of interest;
https://www.science.org/content/article/hidden-conflicts-pharma-payments-fda-advisers-after-drug-approvals-spark-ethical
Then of course there are articles such as this one...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10511535/Former-FDA-head-Scott-Gottlieb-warns-against-delaying-application-COVID-19-vaccine-kids.html
Headline: 'Ex-FDA chief Scott Gottlieb fears delaying seeking approval for COVID-19 vaccine for under-fives will 'confuse' parents and make them less interested in vaccinating their kids - as he urges CDC to relax national indoor mask guidelines
Multiple mentions about him working previously for the FDA and urging them to promote vaccines for the under 5s etc.  Not one mention of him being a current Pfizer board member...
https://www.pfizer.com/people/leadership/board_of_directors/scott_gottlieb-md
So yeah, whilst I could have phrased my comment a little better I make no apologies for continuing to demand the truth and investigations into what has happened over the past few years - with particular interest into early treatments that if proven to be true, had the potential to save millions of lives and prevent the build up of massive worldwide debt and Govt oppression.
And no, I don't expect to change any hearts and minds on here - you're either preaching to the choir or a figure of fun but I'll continue to post the occasional new bit of information that some people may find interesting and ignore the trolls.  Whilst I haven't yet reached levels of activism that require me to leave the comfort of sitting in front of my PC ? there are various online petitions and movements I have joined that want answers and transparency re. various aspects of the covid pandemic.

Apparently, in England the stats show Covid is 40x less lethal than in January 2021 and also now less lethal than flu across every age group: 
There remains a very slightly raised mortality risk because omicron has been so infectious, meaning more people have it than regular flu.

Official docs here;
https://phmpt.org/
If you watched the video he quite clearly states that the number of vaccinations has been redacted in the document.  Why would Pfizer want that number hidden?  Answers here please...  Your own bias will lead you to whatever conclusion it is you want.  Personally, I just want the truth and the redacted parts should have the data provided.  I can't think of a reason why the total number of vaccines given would need to be hidden?!?
Regardless, 40k+ adverse events and 1200 deaths in under 3 months is a concern and should have been public knowledge.  We should have been made fully aware of any side-effects (and compensated for them) and it should have been made illegal (all around the world) to mandate something that no matter how small of a chance may kill you.
I find your final comment is an insult to Dr Campbells work.  I have checked his channel out - which has given out excellent information since long before the pandemic started, and found your remark nothing more than a cheap shot at trying to discredit him ? 
Personally, I'm very interested to see what the data the upcoming releases will tell us - the release so far is only for the first 3 months, 2-4 weeks of which some countries hadn't even started their vaccination programmes and all were primarily focussed on jabbing the elderly and vulnerable. 
Someone linked a video in the comments from a Dr. Bean which is and hour long and worth a watch.  He is also concerned with parts of the document that have been redacted and highlights the findings of more recent studies in the younger generations that show the number of adverse effects from the vaccine to be far worse than what we've been led to believe. 
Again, this needs proper media attention and scrutiny.  We shouldnt allow Big Pharma to try and lock data away for 75yrs and redact information once told to release it (private personal info aside).  I find it stunning that there is barely any mention in or investigative journalism being carried out by the mainstream media.

1.  I was giving Pfizer the benefit of the doubt despite key redactions.
2. I cant find a Pfizer statement saying the documents are false, only a vague articles such as this stating that reports circulating on social media are 'unauthenticated' whilst the actual documents have been released on the FDA website.  The documents that Dr Campbell and other respected sources are using are legit.  I don't care what people say on twitter.
https://www.iol.co.za/news/covid19/pfizer-says-vaccine-adverse-event-document-circulating-on-social-media-is-unauthenticated-039b6345-0479-4dc3-931d-97c79d0f557f
 
Exactly why there should be media noise and an investigation into the findings.  
We don't know how many vaccinations were given in the 3 month time period but we do know there were verified vaccine related deaths and serious adverse effects.  Brushing them off as a small number doesnt provide any resolution to family members that have been harmed by vaccines or have lost loved ones needlessly. 
Redacting the total number of vaccines given only raises concerns that the percentage of negative consequences is both higher than we have been led to believe and higher than is generally considered acceptable.
To even consider mandating a vaccine surely the public have the right to know exactly what the associated risks are - not just be told repeatedly its 'safe and effective' and get called a conspiracy theorist for asking for evidence.  Again, where is the media outcry and investigation into this?
I think you are watching a very different to video to the one I watched and have a very different opinion of the man than I have.  Dr Campbell always provides links and replicates data and quotes in full.  I am happy to forgive him his momentary 'sarcasm lapse' as throughout the pandemic (and career) he has been a strong advocate of vaccination and we have been told that the jabs were 'safe and effective' - he states he is unhappy with the findings and as a medical professional feels letdown that we weren't told about the negative consequences earlier.   Understandable imho.  

Official docs here;
https://phmpt.org/
If you watched the video he quite clearly states that the number of vaccinations has been redacted in the document.  Why would Pfizer want that number hidden?  Answers here please...  Your own bias will lead you to whatever conclusion it is you want.  Personally, I just want the truth and the redacted parts should have the data provided.  I can't think of a reason why the total number of vaccines given would need to be hidden?!?
Regardless, 40k+ adverse events and 1200 deaths in under 3 months is a concern and should have been public knowledge.  We should have been made fully aware of any side-effects (and compensated for them) and it should have been made illegal (all around the world) to mandate something that no matter how small of a chance may kill you.
I find your final comment is an insult to Dr Campbells work.  I have checked his channel out - which has given out excellent information since long before the pandemic started, and found your remark nothing more than a cheap shot at trying to discredit him ? 
Personally, I'm very interested to see what the data the upcoming releases will tell us - the release so far is only for the first 3 months, 2-4 weeks of which some countries hadn't even started their vaccination programmes and all were primarily focussed on jabbing the elderly and vulnerable. 
Someone linked a video in the comments from a Dr. Bean which is and hour long and worth a watch.  He is also concerned with parts of the document that have been redacted and highlights the findings of more recent studies in the younger generations that show the number of adverse effects from the vaccine to be far worse than what we've been led to believe. 
Again, this needs proper media attention and scrutiny.  We shouldnt allow Big Pharma to try and lock data away for 75yrs and redact information once told to release it (private personal info aside).  I find it stunning that there is barely any mention in or investigative journalism being carried out by the mainstream media.

Further to the above, the only mention of the initial batch of Pfizer documents released I can find in the MSM is on GBNews if you can call them mainstream.  I know some of you will immediately roll your eyes at the mention of GBN but the conversation really is quite balanced.
 

Official docs here;
https://phmpt.org/
If you watched the video he quite clearly states that the number of vaccinations has been redacted in the document.  Why would Pfizer want that number hidden?  Answers here please...  Your own bias will lead you to whatever conclusion it is you want.  Personally, I just want the truth and the redacted parts should have the data provided.  I can't think of a reason why the total number of vaccines given would need to be hidden?!?
Regardless, 40k+ adverse events and 1200 deaths in under 3 months is a concern and should have been public knowledge.  We should have been made fully aware of any side-effects (and compensated for them) and it should have been made illegal (all around the world) to mandate something that no matter how small of a chance may kill you.
I find your final comment is an insult to Dr Campbells work.  I have checked his channel out - which has given out excellent information since long before the pandemic started, and found your remark nothing more than a cheap shot at trying to discredit him ? 
Personally, I'm very interested to see what the data the upcoming releases will tell us - the release so far is only for the first 3 months, 2-4 weeks of which some countries hadn't even started their vaccination programmes and all were primarily focussed on jabbing the elderly and vulnerable. 
Someone linked a video in the comments from a Dr. Bean which is and hour long and worth a watch.  He is also concerned with parts of the document that have been redacted and highlights the findings of more recent studies in the younger generations that show the number of adverse effects from the vaccine to be far worse than what we've been led to believe. 
Again, this needs proper media attention and scrutiny.  We shouldnt allow Big Pharma to try and lock data away for 75yrs and redact information once told to release it (private personal info aside).  I find it stunning that there is barely any mention in or investigative journalism being carried out by the mainstream media.

Took the time to watch and one of the main concerns the man was putting across was that the number of vaccines given was redacted so not allowing people to work out any percentage per jab v problems ??‍♂️

The 2004 American one from 2003
 
https://www.esquire.com/entertainment/movies/a36066461/genndy-tartakovsky-clone-wars-series-best-star-wars-prequel/
 
think it’s in Disney plus / or was at some point

Looking forwards to this ?
 
 

I hadn't seen that before and have just sat down to watch it - as you say powerful stuff.
If there is any truth in the fact that Ivermectin helps prevent against 70%+ of covid related deaths and hospitalizations and this was known about back in January 2021 but suppressed and ridiculed, we (the people) shouldn't stop shouting about it until people have lost their jobs, been imprisoned and made sure that similar situations can never arise again.  Never gonna happen but I can hope...
It seems amazing to me that we can encounter a novel virus, decode it, mass produce a vaccine that passes (albeit rushed) safety tests quicker than we can conduct a high quality study into an existing widely used and historically safe drug.  The Oxford study into Ivermectin has been going on for approx a year now but had to shut down for a while due to a lack of Ivermectin ?. 
Maybe I'm just being naive but during the worst of the pandemic, certainly before the vaccine became available - when people were dying in their tens of thousands a day globally I would have moved heaven and earth to run rigorous tests on anything that seemed like it may be able to help.  Instead we get the FDA in the full knowledge that Ivermectin has been safely used billions of times by humans tweeting out its a horse drug. 
Something doesn't up and I hope some tenacious bugger eventually gets to the truth.
 

We need a thorough investigation into the response to the pandemic, from Govt and corporate overreach, the influence of Sage (and their at times bizarre modelling) to media censorship and propaganda, etc.  
I doubt we'll ever get one however, a lot of people have made a lot of money during the pandemic and enjoyed the power, control and virtuousness they have exerted over others.

The mainstream media now unveiling the deliberate lies whilst pretending they weren’t complicit 
https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-expert-claims-he-was-told-to-correct-his-views-after-criticising-implausible-graph-shown-during-official-briefing-12555800
 
https://apple.news/AoAe7C2xsQuiaa4zk1wAW8w
 

You may have seen this, very powerful:https://odysee.com/@OracleFilms:1/2022.03.04-A-Letter-to-Andrew-Hill-V8_HD:3
 

My gut feeling is that the controversy surrounding Ivermectin will rumble on until some actual investigative journalism uncovers the truth - does anyone do that anymore?!? 
 
 

Yes, but they get banned from every media platform if they investigate the wrong things.

Health freak.

Yup and whilst the world is looking in another direction Pfizer have started releasing the documents they wanted to hide for 75yrs - the first batch has already revealed some interesting data...
And in other more positive news a peer reviewed study from Israel has finally confirmed that keeping your Vitamin D levels up (virtually impossible to do in the UK due to our climate) massively reduces your risk of suffering from a bad case of covid.  Its cheap and easy to do and has many more benefits than purely helping with covid, we've all been taking various vitamin supplements since the outbreak began at chez maxjam and the only one of us to catch covid has been our 18yo son (and that was a mild case lasting 3-4 days in February of this year).
 
 

Shocking news.
https://www.foxsports.com.au/cricket/australia/shane-warne-dies-death-age-cause-of-death-australia-legend-passes-away-in-thailand-of-suspected-heart-attack/news-story/2871d970df662a247709703aa287ce84

It’s like the world leaders and media have flicked the off switch on covid , puff ,,,,,,and like that it was gone 

Such sad news.
 

Imagine subbing Kepa on for a penalty shoot-out, he doesn't save any of the 11 penalties he faces then misses his own ? 
Liverpool win the Carabao Cup.

No more tactics in the Premier League then. Just kick and hope again. Sad times