Jump to content

Robert Snodgrass


Coneheadjohn

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I have worked out his stats through a tried and tested formula, comparing minutes on the pitch, minutes with the ball (not his own), goals, assists, yellow/red cards ratio, pass rate accuracy, man of the match performances, finishing, defensive contribution and hair and I have come to the conclusion that this is a "NO" and he is a ugly **** and suffers erectile dysfunction(apparently)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, bigbadbob said:

So, what do you think?

Well,apart from having a name thats bloody difficult to spell that looks like shrewd business.

Could be Villas best signing for the money.

Probably would have been a good one for us for next season depending on what Bryson does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hull scored 20 and he's been involved in 10 of them. He's a key player in a prem side, it's good value IMO. He could keep Burnley up which would be massive for them.

Look at it this way, Vydra for 8m or Snodgrass for 10m? (Ignoring wages for this comparison obviously).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, HantsRam said:

Bidding war started. West ham have had bid accepted also plus Middlesbrough sniffing around,  possibly because ramirez wants away.

Can't be good for the hull manager - that's his entire central midfield gone.

It may be exactly what they needed. To get 20 millions from Livermore and Snodgrass is marvellous business and the new manager have cash to replace their weakest area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Dimmu said:

It may be exactly what they needed. To get 20 millions from Livermore and Snodgrass is marvellous business and the new manager have cash to replace their weakest area.

Their weakest area will the position where Snodgrass plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...