Jump to content

Alton Towers Crash


LesterRam

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

even mechanical failures are caused by human error somewhere back down the line.

Just put a 10 foot thick rubber bumper on the front with a massive magnet that pushes the cars away from each other. Job done

​A career in rollercoaster design beckons for you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

even mechanical failures are caused by human error somewhere back down the line.

Just put a 10 foot thick rubber bumper on the front with a massive magnet that pushes the cars away from each other. Job done

​too much blue peter has paid off !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

​It's going to be shut until they find out what went wrong.

The CEO (Nick Varney) made a strange statement...

"At this point I don't know if it was a technological or human error".

Any rollercoaster ride in the world which allows a carriage to depart while another one is stationary on the track has failed from a technological sense, even if it is being operated by a minimum-wage school-leaver. Whereas you would dearly love to blame 'human error', I am pretty sure that the problem will lie with the ride and its fail-safe mechanisms

true Eddie - unless someone was told about the car being there by a member of the public (as was reported) and that member of staff didn't hit the emergency stop button.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

even mechanical failures are caused by human error somewhere back down the line.

Just put a 10 foot thick rubber bumper on the front with a massive magnet that pushes the cars away from each other. Job done


not all. Mechanical failure in a system could be the result of a fault in manufacture of a part. Not necessarily caused by a human error.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not all. Mechanical failure in a system could be the result of a fault in manufacture of a part. Not necessarily caused by a human error.

Even if manufactured wrong, the part has to be inspected to ISO standards by an actual human being, and signed off as being ok.

Of course, a that'll do attitude is normally the prevailing one, especially when profits are on the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if manufactured wrong, the part has to be inspected to ISO standards by an actual human being, and signed off as being ok.

Of course, a that'll do attitude is normally the prevailing one, especially when profits are on the line.


hidden fatigue or faults in casting can not be seen by human eye nor sometimes in tests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hidden fatigue or faults in casting can not be seen by human eye nor sometimes in tests.

Fatigue wouldn't be an issue in the manufacture of a brand new part, so we can put that to one side.

Casting wouldn't be the manufacturing technique on any safety critical part of a rollercoaster, such as wheels or brake systems so that rules that one out too, the accepted tolerances are too large.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fatigue wouldn't be an issue in the manufacture of a brand new part, so we can put that to one side.

Casting wouldn't be the manufacturing technique on any safety critical part of a rollercoaster, such as wheels or brake systems so that rules that one out too, the accepted tolerances are too large.


maybe in this particular case, but you said any mechanical failure is the result of human error. Fatigue could lead to failure in old or heavily used parts, which could lead to failure.

 

not every incident has a human to pin the blame on, even though society likes to have a scapegoat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maybe in this particular case, but you said any mechanical failure is the result of human error. Fatigue could lead to failure in old or heavily used parts, which could lead to failure.

 

not every incident has a human to pin the blame on, even though society likes to have a scapegoat

I understand what you're saying, I too think sometimes things happen which are just an unforeseeable accident, could well be the case here, 1st ride of its kind in the world, sometimes despite the best planning you can't foresee every eventuality, hope Merlin look after the people injured. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Thorpe Park ride has been closed for investigation (SAW?)

Made by the same company as the smiler.

By the sounds of it, it was human error to send the carriage down with another on track broken down. However, there is something that is not being revealed. By the sounds of it either the brakes failed which means a major fault in the system.

Heard they have a automatic brake system on the ride which will stop carriages if there is another on track which makes sense. this may have failed.

Or on the other side the 4ft clearance they had from front row to front carriage didn't absorb the impact. the safety bar seems to have cut into the legs of multiple passengers either indicating this safety bar which is meant to stop people from falling out during a crash failed to act and instead crushed the passengers or the safety bar wasn't strong enough to withstand the impact and buckled severely injuring the passengers.

I imagine both of these issues might have been in play and so every ride made by this company will have to evaluate if changes need to be made or the smiler incident was just a one off.

Anyway, thoughts go out to the people involved 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Thorpe Park ride has been closed for investigation (SAW?)

Made by the same company as the smiler.

By the sounds of it, it was human error to send the carriage down with another on track broken down. However, there is something that is not being revealed. By the sounds of it either the brakes failed which means a major fault in the system.

Heard they have a automatic brake system on the ride which will stop carriages if there is another on track which makes sense. this may have failed.

Or on the other side the 4ft clearance they had from front row to front carriage didn't absorb the impact. the safety bar seems to have cut into the legs of multiple passengers either indicating this safety bar which is meant to stop people from falling out during a crash failed to act and instead crushed the passengers or the safety bar wasn't strong enough to withstand the impact and buckled severely injuring the passengers.

I imagine both of these issues might have been in play and so every ride made by this company will have to evaluate if changes need to be made or the smiler incident was just a one off.

Anyway, thoughts go out to the people involved 


the cats has a metal rail at the front which is what would have buckled and pushed back into the legs. There's also a photo if the car concerned and the floor had buckled too. The safety harness is over the shoulder.

 

multi car rollercoasters are covered in sensors detecting cars positions. If one has stopped on the track it triggers and sets the breaks off. Looks like the sensors may have failed - ie the station operator didn't get the warning the track was blocked, or the automated system preventing release with a car stuck on track didn't operate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feared one of them might have sustained an injury serious enough to warrant this, I'm really sorry for the girl, bloody cruel, I hope she's made of strong stuff and it doesn't knock her confidence long term.

All the best to her and indeed the other three victims. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the cats has a metal rail at the front which is what would have buckled and pushed back into the legs. There's also a photo if the car concerned and the floor had buckled too. The safety harness is over the shoulder.

 

multi car rollercoasters are covered in sensors detecting cars positions. If one has stopped on the track it triggers and sets the breaks off. Looks like the sensors may have failed - ie the station operator didn't get the warning the track was blocked, or the automated system preventing release with a car stuck on track didn't operate.

Correct/ The metal rail at the front is a handrail to be used when entering and leaving the car. It is in no way design to be a crash barrier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...