Boycie Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Me thinks he was jesting Wasn't he? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyinLiverpool Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Me thinks he was jesting Wasn't he? That it was thought a serious post just shows what a state some people have got themselves into after a couple of defeats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomsdubs Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 He isn't going to admit he got things wrong in a live radio interview. We've lost two games, if it turns in to 5 then we can start kicking off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North_Stand_Ram Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Keogh almost blamed Christie for their winner in his interview which I thought was very harsh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyinLiverpool Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Keogh almost blamed Christie for their winner in his interview which I thought was very harsh Almost very harsh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pearl Ram Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 I hope not NSR, I haven't heard his interview mind so probably shouldn't comment but fook it, I will. All I'd say is he should think back to our last game of the season before even thinking about dishing out blame for us conceding late winners, we win as a team, we lose as a team, apportioning blame for mistakes cannot be good for the collective morale. Captain or no captain. $hit happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IlsonDerby Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Don't have a problem with his skirting around questions to avoid criticising players. He can do that behind closed doors. What I did have a problem with, and have done for the last 2 losses is Keogh(and I like Keogh) coming out afterwards and telling us that the oppositions goals were lucky. I'd much rather him admit to them being good goals or the defending not being good enough but to call them lucky is arrogant to say the least. It treats us like we're not clever enough to understand football. Obviously there was some fortune to Wigan's goals but it was via bad defending it wasn't like a deep cross from a full back has lobbed the keeper. Or Brentford's goals? where was the luck? two well worked goals that we would have been delighted to score. Don't treat us like mugs because we are perfectly capable of deciding whether a goal is lucky by ourselves and none of those he has called lucky have been down to luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North_Stand_Ram Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 I hope not NSR, I haven't heard his interview mind so probably shouldn't comment but fook it, I will. All I'd say is he should think back to our last game of the season before even thinking about dishing out blame for us conceding late winners, we win as a team, we lose as a team, apportioning blame for mistakes cannot be good for the collective morale. Captain or no captain. $hit happens. He basically said "Cyrus probably should have stop stopped the cross, probably should have defended better there" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IlsonDerby Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 He basically said "Cyrus probably should have stop stopped the cross, probably should have defended better there" no he didn't he said something along the lines of 'yeah they've got a late one which has gone in off Cyrus, we should have defended it better' I didn't read that as him blaming Christie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorne Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 With Christie we sacrificed a more solid defence that Wisdom gave us in favour of more attacking flare. That's not a bag thing but people on balance need to decide what they prefer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomsdubs Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 The whole defence were standing watching on both goals, at least Cyrus tried to get a block in. Keogh needs to have a word with himself and think whether he is really leading the boys like he should be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taggy180 Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Keogh should partly blame himself for the first goal. Was ball watching and gave gray far too much space Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RLACML Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Hilarious. Bring back the man who single handedly put me on the cusp of stopping going after 35 years? No thanks. That reflects worse on you than it does on Clough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YorkshireRam Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Keogh should partly blame himself for the first goal. Was ball watching and gave gray far too much space Mascarell is most to blame for the first goal. Out of position in the first place and then allows their man to run into space... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrivateDerby Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Couldn't make it but just watched the highlights and the interview. I think he's right, it just didn't fall for us yesterday. But... we looked knackered and slack at the back. Nothing to worry about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcnram Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Don't have a problem with his skirting around questions to avoid criticising players. He can do that behind closed doors. What I did have a problem with, and have done for the last 2 losses is Keogh(and I like Keogh) coming out afterwards and telling us that the oppositions goals were lucky. I'd much rather him admit to them being good goals or the defending not being good enough but to call them lucky is arrogant to say the least. It treats us like we're not clever enough to understand football. Obviously there was some fortune to Wigan's goals but it was via bad defending it wasn't like a deep cross from a full back has lobbed the keeper. Or Brentford's goals? where was the luck? two well worked goals that we would have been delighted to score. Don't treat us like mugs because we are perfectly capable of deciding whether a goal is lucky by ourselves and none of those he has called lucky have been down to luck. Keogh is absolutely spot on with the first goal. I bet the Brentford player couldn't believe his luck when Keogh once again went walkabout, leaving him alone to take his shot untroubled by a challenge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taggy180 Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Thats why i dont understand why he didnt pick eustace, he would have done better in them sorts of situations. Cant believe how far brentford travelled without us making a challenge. Poor poor goal to concede Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbobram Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Cant believe some of the drivel i read on this forum after a loss. Can you all calm the F down. We will lose games this season, but we will win a lot more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmericanRam Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 #inmacitrust Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcnram Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Cant believe some of the drivel i read on this forum after a loss. Can you all calm the F down. We will lose games this season, but we will win a lot more. Nothing to do with not being calm, but McClaren does not seem able to get the side to hold onto the ball at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.