Mihangel

You're right, perhaps CK should have used his old Derbyshire Building Society junior savings account, or the HSBC super saver account he set up in 2018, 'just in case'

So he doesn't have until tomorrow to actually complete it, he just has to give 'satisfactory evidence.' The other parties have been spoken to 'as a contingency.' It's clear that Kirchner is the best bid and I hope it happens.

You're right, perhaps CK should have used his old Derbyshire Building Society junior savings account, or the HSBC super saver account he set up in 2018, 'just in case'

Good for you, weathers been shocking in North Wales today so I've been induce doing some of my voluntary tech work instead of landscaping outside. As such I've been online basically all day. Tomorrow will, literally, be a breath of fresh air as I'm outdoors making some gates and checking in occasionally.... Enjoy your holiday 
 

What a strange thing to post - It's not the 18th century you know, one doesn't have to be landed to vote, people are entitled their opinion regardless of their wealth.

Likewise, and ultimately that's why we won't end up with Ashley, he's tainted. Some of the stuff that CK had had to deal with would be chicken feed, and the abuse to Ashley would be far more public. Won't happen.

Likewise, and ultimately that's why we won't end up with Ashley, he's tainted. Some of the stuff that CK had had to deal with would be chicken feed, and the abuse to Ashley would be far more public. Won't happen.

Likewise, and ultimately that's why we won't end up with Ashley, he's tainted. Some of the stuff that CK had had to deal with would be chicken feed, and the abuse to Ashley would be far more public. Won't happen.

'Kin 'ell, has Normo Tebbs published his autobiography or summat?
 

He sure did. 
Those whistle-blowers were first against the wall.

Doesn't make it acceptable just because people throughout history have exploited other people. Personally I don't want Ashley and if he owns the club I will not got to matches. Just my own little stand against a man whose business model I don't like. I left DW sports when he took it over. Sometimes you have to make a stand. I didn't go to matches when Robert Maxwell owned the club either. If other people support him that's fine,  that's their choice.

If i had accumilated his wealth the rams would be safe, not waiting till i could get them as cheap as i could.

Was referring to shirebrook.

No,but not much choice is itif you have got a famiy to look after.

Yeah. Get rich by exploiting other people. It's the British way.  The empire was built on it. ?
Rule Britannia....?

Cheers Sherlock.

I've just promised the other half that'll I'll run round the garden with my backside allowing in celebration of this happens in the morning. Concerned.

Not on an immediate, financial and football, basis, no. However, CK has come out and said he will maintain the academy status which is really important IMO. Ashley has a history of spending zero on facilities at St James' Park and have you ever been to Sport Direct Porthmadog? It's one of the most soulless 'pile them high, sell them cheap' experiences you'll ever have. I hope and believe that CK will embrace more a US approach to stadium facilities which would be great.

Fat Flocking Pavarottiwannabee?

Fat Flocking Pavarottiwannabee?

I don't want to be Mr Negative as I'm generally feeling much more positive today than yesterday BUT that if the above is true it's going to have alarm bells ringing in Bank HQ wherever that is!! Any large payment will be 'delayed' by queries, you have to answer them, and if you can't answer them then it's a problem...

I don't want to be Mr Negative as I'm generally feeling much more positive today than yesterday BUT that if the above is true it's going to have alarm bells ringing in Bank HQ wherever that is!! Any large payment will be 'delayed' by queries, you have to answer them, and if you can't answer them then it's a problem...

It would be the receiving institution (not a govt agency) that would undertake the process. It would be done at the point of cleansing, ie. typically when it stops just being money moved around and is moved to an investment/other financial instrument etc.

I suspect that the EFL test is a box ticking exercise to make sure it complies with their rules. The financial institution would be doing it to prevent potential unlimited fines and jail sentences, the two things are poles apart, that's for certain.

I suspect that the EFL test is a box ticking exercise to make sure it complies with their rules. The financial institution would be doing it to prevent potential unlimited fines and jail sentences, the two things are poles apart, that's for certain.