Jump to content

Sparkle

Member
  • Posts

    14,771
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sparkle

  1. 30 minutes ago, Bris Vegas said:

    Who? I don’t recall Bolton, Ipswich, Charlton or Sheffield Wednesday gambling future PL money while they were in the Championship.

    Forest are gambling three year’s worth of PL money in one season. It’s working for them. But it’s still a gamble. I mean, if they go down, they would have to be promoted almost immediately (like Aston Villa or QPR) or they will be destroyed.

    But it seems of all the clubs who have gambled recklessly, Derby are the only ones who haven’t been rewarded for it.

    It does seem a monumental reckless gamble but fair play to the owners for trying but if the money wasn’t tainted it would be feel better maybe. Fulham and the dogs have certainly got the likes of Everton, Southampton and West Ham very worried which is rather funny. 
    if they do go down - oh Dear but obviously they would have won the league by November in their eyes even the ones with three of them 

  2. 6 hours ago, Ian Buxton's Bat said:

    It was always like playing with 10 men. I used to get that "why has he picked Bennett for the play-off final?" style feeling in my stomach every time he 'played'.

    Just checked out his wiki page - allegedly only played 18 times for us yet it left a huge black hole of disappointment and resentment that's never fully healed.

    Wiki page is worth a read - it cheered me up.

    The worse thing was that the club was admitting they couldn’t get anything better than him and he cost money - you knew we were going to struggle massively to score goals 

  3. We would be a bit silly to accept a low ball offer for lots of reasons already mentioned 

    we can’t spend any money, we can’t replace his youth in defence, he’s worth a lot more to us than the price of a sale. 
    Biggest issues - does he want to go to Norwich- I doubt it - does he want to be paid more money - I am sure he does - do we need more money to pay Arsenal and the polish club who we owe money to - probably. 
     

    I value him at £5 million and upwards - sure we can replace him with what we have got this season but next season we have replace him and we can’t spend money? - Norwich can buy Belick if they want 

  4. It’s hard to catch teams when there are so many poor sides in the third division because the better sides will struggle not to win 

    we are trying to catch teams with two ageing centre forwards in Collins and McGoldrick - they have done well considering we had five players under contract in August and with all our imposed restrictions 

  5. 4 minutes ago, Rambalin said:

    There are ways for the agent to get his money just not directly from the club. I have said before I knew someone at Birmingham when they were under embargo and was told there were people at the EFL actively telling them how to circumvent the rules of it. 

    Yes that was Harvey at the EFL who told us we were fine with out amortisation 

    It’s Parry now and he shafted us and I wouldn’t give him the chance to do it again 

  6. 19 minutes ago, Loughborough Ram said:

    I always thought that Hugill was a decent forward unless you wanted him to score goals! His effort and workrate are beyond question, but in my opinion, he needs 10 chances to score a goal.

     

     

     

    We already have a couple of those but if Warne is confident that he could coach him to score 1 in every 3 or 4 chances then we'd have a top notch striker.

     

    The same has always been said of McGoldrick To be fair 

×
×
  • Create New...