Jump to content

cstand

Member
  • Posts

    2,701
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by cstand

  1. On 24/03/2024 at 08:56, NottsRam77 said:

    Ok … here we go.. please remember im saying this in good faith and non of it is meant to sound condescending 👍

    If have read any of my previous ramblings.

    the reason bitcoin is different to every other altcoin is that no one person or entity can control bitcoin.

    no one can decide to mine more that the current limit of coins per day (900) .. soon to be 450. 
    no one can shut it down, no one can change the rules on how it works it is totally and utterly decentralised.

    altcoins arent… 

    alt coins are created by individuals, collaborations, companys or anyone who knows how to. 
     

    they are centralised, they are controlled by said creators. They make the rules, they can change the rules, the can print 1million coins today… then 10 million coins tomorrow. They can tuen their network on, off and shake it all about if they wanted to. 
    examples of these are solana, celo, ethereum, xrp, ada etc etc 

    now within these chains u have developments .. aka meme coins.. that are the s*** of the s***.

    from experience… i used to mess about on the celo network.. cos it had the same utility as ethereum but its gas fees were buttons.. unlike ethereum.

    i found with celo loads of “projects” that i could earn 10, 20, 25 and at one point 50% on my stablecoins (usdc, usdt .. stablecoins are a 1-1 representation of a digital dollar).

    I thought well thats winning .. wont get that in the bank.  
    so i loaded up a load of usdc (celo digital dollar) and went onto a load of these “projects”. 
    sure they paid out… mobius (mob) , immortal (immo) pinniata (pinn) and god knows what else.

    all these sites had their own tokens which if u held offer u governance on their sites and higher interest rates… so u could vote on the path the project took.. all a big scam.

    These tokens .. are literally worthless,

    they are held in their millions by the developers who are sat waiting to dump onto jo public. But they pay influencers to shill their tokens to try and convince people this is the next big thing.

    fortunately i quickly realised this and got out with my monies in tact.

    but non of those projects lasted more than a year or so.. and shock horror those developers wrapped it up and moved onto the next “project” .. meme coins are basically scamland.. my advise is to stay well clear.

    so in summary u have

    bitcoin

    altcoins

    s*** of the s*** meme coin tokens

    And its up to u how tolerant to risk u are as to where u put ur cash.

    s*** of the s*** meme coin tokens.. u may as well go down the casino and put ur money on red or black

    altcoins, some have good utility.. but imo end of the day ur investing in something controlled by someone else. They can print as many coins one day as they want. they could shut it down tomorrow. They could get hacked tomorrow.

    can u make money from them, yes of course if u buy in at the right time.. i just see them as a risk as theyre controlled by a third party

    bitcoin is everything these things arnt and is a totally different animal 

    hope this helps a little 

    feel free to ask anything iv missed 

    That’s a great reply thanks for the time and effort.

    Still invested in KR1 who should be invested in quality alt coins they are founders in the crypto space.

    Its trades at a 30% discount to its NAV 

    What I like about proof of stake is the guaranteed revenue it generates every year.

    This could become a takeover target in the future as I expect investment companies will eventually want to start this sort of fund.

     

  2. 34 minutes ago, GboroRam said:

    You keep going on about stuff like this and I'm genuinely trying to give you chance to post, but I don't see any relevance regarding X/twitter. I part think I should remove it, and also don't want to dictate the content of the thread. But I don't get the relevance. Yes, the market for social media is full of firms that put profits ahead of their user base. What's that to do with Twitter? 

    Twitter/X is a social media platform that is being criticised in this thread so it’s only natural there has to be a comparison to other social media platforms to judge if these criticisms are justified or just a criticism of Elon Musk.

    I was actually thinking of starting a new thread Elon Musk good or bad for humanity so any criticism against Elon Musk either in Twitter,SpaceX or EV threads could be moved by the mods so we can concentrate on the subject at hand. 
     

    I can start a thread if you think that would be beneficial?

     

  3. On 29/03/2024 at 17:10, Stive Pesley said:

    No one is arguing that all the social media  companies aren't terrible in their own way. 

    But only one of them has been taken over by an entitled billionaire man baby with the express intent of "making it better". Which is the exact topic of this thread.

    If all someone has to offer to the debate is "Facebook is a bad too" then you wonder why they bother. I better they are a delight at dinner parties 

     

    Four of the largest school boards in Ontario Canada are taking social media to court because they are designed to be addictive disruptive and detrimental to young people’s mental health.


    1. Meta/facebook/Instagram

    2. Snapchat

    3. Tik Tok.

    Thirty Three states in the US are also taking Meta to court.

    29/03/24


    https://apnews.com/article/canada-schools-social-media-lawsuit-179873076587ca57ba7e24f836dc604b

    Not sure how many teachers go to dinner parties. 😀

    https://apnews.com/article/metachildrenteensharmslawsuit-17858802d76143d358e38ee15150dc94
     

     

  4. 7 hours ago, Comrade 86 said:

    From The Independent:

    AOC skewers Elon Musk’s anti-immigrant stance with four-word tweet

    Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has called out tech billionaire Elon Musk for a baseless anti-immigration post.

    Responding to a post from Mr Musk that claimed Democrats want to “import voters,” the progressive New York lawmaker pointed out an undeniable fact in response on Thursday.

    “You’re literally an immigrant,” Ms Ocasio-Cortez wrote on X. Mr Musk was born and raised in South Africa — he moved to Canada in 1988 before migrating to the US.

    “And for everyone saying ‘yeah, but legal!!’ may I once again remind you that seeking asylum is legal, too,” the lawmaker continued.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/aoc-elon-musk-immigration-b2520835.html

    AOC.  I apologise

    Musk. Nobody is perfect.

    AOC. Body language, take me now Musk baby.

    This will never grow old. 😂😂😂

     

  5. 22 hours ago, Stive Pesley said:

    The judge actually ruled that the case was a SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) - that's a legal action intended to censor, intimidate, and silence critics by burdening them with the cost of a legal defence until they abandon their criticism or opposition.

    Not a good look for the "free speech absolutist"

    Ironically the lawyers he used now risk being de-barred because part of the Bar rules in California are that you don't bring frivolous or malicious cases. Doubly so if Elton wants to try and appeal what was a pretty firm judgement

    https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ai-safety-google-meta-should-start-own-ads-rob-leathern-8mz6c?trk=public_post_main-feed-card_feed-article-content

    https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-google-monopolizing-digital-advertising-technologies

    https://www.bmj.com/content/383/bmj.p2518#:~:text=The lawsuit also accuses Meta,million log on each day.

    So Google or Meta are better than X 😂 😂

  6. Another great YouTube video I watched couple of years ago about Haiti. 
    Profits from the video was taken to the village elder.

    The people in the village looked really friendly. 
     

    Read the comments dont just look at the video 

  7. On 25/03/2024 at 22:53, Comrade 86 said:

    BBC News:

    A US judge has thrown out a lawsuit brought by Elon Musk's social media firm X against a group that had claimed that hate speech had risen on the platform since the tech tycoon took over.

    X had accused the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) of taking "unlawful" steps to access its data.

    The US judge dismissed the case and said it was "evident" Mr Musk's X Corp did not like criticism.

    X said it planned to appeal.

    Imran Ahmed, founder and chief executive of CCDH, celebrated the win, saying Mr Musk had conducted a "loud, hypocritical campaign" of harassment and abuse against his organisation in an attempt to "avoid taking responsibility for his own decisions".

    Full Story: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-68657840

    Everybody takes each other to court in the US all the time it’s part of the American dream.😀

    Not looking like a hated figurehead in this video.

  8. 15 hours ago, Comrade 86 said:

    That's just Elon's stats, no? Can't tear himself away, the poor lad, he's on it 24/7! 

    In all seriousness though, is anything on Twitter (apart from Elon) that is actually alive, or is it just a gazillion pesky bots these days? As far as I can see, on the hot topics, it's  just a bunch of folk 'debating' mostly AI generated 'engagement content', all blissfully unaware they're arguing with a software program. We were told that all the Blue Tick stuff was expressly intended to identify accounts actually owned by sentient beings and fund the rooting out of the bot farms, hence the verification fees charged to his loyal human users. What happened to that then?

    Sadly for Elon and his followers, advertisers won't be fooled anyway, as they already had compelling reasons for jumping ship and won't return until Twitter is in new ownership.

    Stats don’t align with your hopes and aspirations?

    X overrun by bots and AI?

    Advertisers flocking to an ever diminishing audience think again.

    image.thumb.jpeg.f918c4c1de0a5a165ca65d134e1d1d31.jpeg

    https://www.televisual.com/news/ofcom-report-steep-decline-in-broadcast-tv-viewing/#:~:text=The average time that viewers,in 2022 (-12%).

  9. During covid lockdown I watched a YouTube video about Haiti and was really shocked at the deprivation the people suffered in this country.

    Even more shocking was the MSM ignorance.

    Anyway bizarrely about the same time this thread was started I watch a fantastic YouTube video about Haiti which explained everything that has gone wrong with the country over the last few hundred years.

    Do not just look at the video read the comment section very informative from many different people.

    Twice as many African slaves were taken to Haiti than the USA.

    70% of all the trees in Haiti have gone it will end up being wasteland.

    Its an earthquake and Hurricane disaster area just waiting to happen so no foreign investors.

     

  10.  

    3 hours ago, Stive Pesley said:

    He did the Lemon interview because he wanted to try and expand Twitter into a broadcast video platform. Lemon was fired from CNN for making controversial "unwoke" comments about women, so Musk clearly saw him as prime candidate to entice his anti-woke fanboys

    Didn't really go as planned 😂

    Lemon shows going downhill fast

    image.thumb.png.6b9bebe70c2c3b671e480560dbbfa2d0.png

  11. What is the difference between crypto coins and tokens?

    Solana has risen about 400 % in the last year mainly because tokens  can be easily released by using Solana?

    I have seen a lot crap about the tokens on Solana which I really want to avoid. 

    https://mashable.com/article/racist-antisemitic-memecoins-solana-blockchain-cryptocurrency


    Why don’t people create their own crypto coin instead of creating a tokens on Solana? 

    Is this why Bitcoin is different to alt coins apart from proof of stake.?

     

  12. 3 minutes ago, Chester40 said:

    Bearing in mind after some games the majority were saying he wasn't good enough and they wanted a change,  its amazing how quickly the mood changes for me!

    Also - even the biggest Warne supporter would struggle to say we keep emphatically putting the opposition to the sword either.

    It's a tough watch at times, lots of tight games, plenty of energy and heart but free flowing football rarely seen in both halves. Strong defenders,  soaking up pressure, quick breaks down the wing and moments of quality are often what we are working towards.

    Somehow we are clear in 2nd without it really feeling like we have played 'that' well many times.

    Functional, hard working, content to win by the odd goal... the whole season feels slightly characterised as going to be 'who cares about the performance, just get the points'...

    But we knew that before he started and he's done it before and its no fluke.  

    And he's 7 games away from becoming a Derby legend.

    Derby legend when we are promoted Forest get relegated and we beat them 1st game.

  13. 7 hours ago, Stive Pesley said:

    It's at this point that it becomes clear it's a total cult. Do they even hear the words they are saying??

    If you resisting something you are feeding it.

    Any energy you are fighting you are feeding it.

    If you are pushing something away you are inviting it to stay forever.

    If you have no alternative you are just playing devils advocate.

    If you criticise everything you will never create anything.

×
×
  • Create New...