Jump to content

Jason Shackell

BorneoRam

By BorneoRam
in Transfer Forum

Recommended Posts

RIMBAUD

RIMBAUD

Posted
Posted

We rejected 4 Bids.

3 of 1.1 Million form Cardiff,Burnley and ?

1 of 1.3 Million from Burnley.

The Papers have put in an excess of 1.1 Million as No-one outside the clubs no put as these bids went public they know they didnt take less than that figure.I would rather not know and just see waht they do with but hopefully dont splash it.We should get up to Million for Addison,Savies and Bailey.Then if anyone has heard Liverpool and fulham want Huddlestone so with our 17.5% sell on clause that should get some money.As long as about 6 players are bought i will be happy as it shows shackell was sold to improve the squad and not the finances

so you don't know then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
ESR

ESR

Posted
Posted

Shackell was sold for 1.1m, making a profit of 400k, and if he played another game we would have owed Barnsley 400k, so was good business tbh, and enables us to strengthen in other areas.

Shackell and Green were on good wages so we have that to play with as well now.

i trust Clough in the transfer market, but am hoping that he doesnt expect OB and Buxton to be the starting CBs, 1 more please, i would like okuonghae

How was it profit of 400k?

BBC say we bought him for in excess of £1m

[url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/13845821]http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/13845821

We need key Championship players that are leaders, it gives the squad a good blend rather than filling the team with 11 youngsters who are from League 2. It won't work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GboroRam

GboroRam

Posted
Posted

How was it profit of 400k?

BBC say we bought him for in excess of £1m

Could be £700k with £400k+ if he hits x games played. Would explain the urgency of the sale, the quoted 400k profits and the fee in excess of £1m. But that said, it's just a guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MarkDcfc1

MarkDcfc1

Posted
Posted

People are not Getting the point.Its not saying its 1.1Million they are saying its not less than that because's first bid went public and that was 1.1 and it was rejected they came back with a second bid of 1.3 Million.So i cant say what the actual price is but its more than 1.3.Might not be straight cash aswell could be built up in clauses inwhich we might not get.But with Clubs interested in Savies i think he will get a decent amount of money to bring in 5-6 Players.So screw all this Negative vibes.COYR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
davenportram

davenportram

Posted
Posted

People are not Getting the point.Its not saying its 1.1Million they are saying its not less than that because's first bid went public and that was 1.1 and it was rejected they came back with a second bid of 1.3 Million.So i cant say what the actual price is but its more than 1.3.Might not be straight cash aswell could be built up in clauses inwhich we might not get.But with Clubs interested in Savies i think he will get a decent amount of money to bring in 5-6 Players.So screw all this Negative vibes.COYR.

If there was a bid of £1.3m which you seem to know about then surely the headline should be .....at least £1.3m

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MarkDcfc1

MarkDcfc1

Posted
Posted

If there was a bid of £1.3m which you seem to know about then surely the headline should be .....at least £1.3m

Its on Sky sports.We Rejected Several bids for him.

Your the guy off transfer rumours you can't use grammar properly.. You said Shackell wasn't going for ages and then he went. So why should we believe you? You make up crap to make us sound like an amazing team, so please SHUT UP.

When did i ever say he wasnt leaving.See how you tell me to Shut up while sat at a computer

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MarkDcfc1

MarkDcfc1

Posted
Posted

If there was a bid of £1.3m which you seem to know about then surely the headline should be .....at least £1.3m

No because they think we went back after thinking about the offers and accepted the lowest one.Dosent make sense

Link to comment
Share on other sites
North_Stand_Ram

North_Stand_Ram

Posted
Posted

Please just ban this idiot. When didn't you say he was leaving.. Oh dear. One second...

Here - You havnt agreed a fee.Wheres the evidence.You have only stepped up your interest by offering a another laughable bid.We paid 1.1 for him last summer why would we take 1.2 a 100k profit.

There has been no fee agreed derby fans have staged a protest at thus rumour being allowed to get this far.dont start getting ahead of yourself just because there is an article on sky sports saying we might sell him.If you offer 3-5 Million fine then start talking but all these carp 1.1 and 1.3 are just going to keep getting rejected.We are no place to be forced to sell all this will be cleared up by tomorrow as funds will be made by baileys and davies sale

3-5m ey 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' />

Deluded fans.Now i see sky sports have jumped on this Bs Bandwagon.This Bs will be cleared by the end of the week.He was never leaving im really suprised that it got this far.As many fans had read the article and thought it was true had rang to ask for a refund on their season ticket and were told shackell will not be sold.Clough will be heavily blamed for making articles which allow clubs to think hes for sale.Hes not for sale if a club wants to pay over the odds for him fine but whyon earth would we sell a player below his value.Deluded fans

'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' /> 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' />

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MarkDcfc1

MarkDcfc1

Posted
Posted

Please just ban this idiot. When didn't you say he was leaving.. Oh dear. One second...

Here - You havnt agreed a fee.Wheres the evidence.You have only stepped up your interest by offering a another laughable bid.We paid 1.1 for him last summer why would we take 1.2 a 100k profit.

There has been no fee agreed derby fans have staged a protest at thus rumour being allowed to get this far.dont start getting ahead of yourself just because there is an article on sky sports saying we might sell him.If you offer 3-5 Million fine then start talking but all these carp 1.1 and 1.3 are just going to keep getting rejected.We are no place to be forced to sell all this will be cleared up by tomorrow as funds will be made by baileys and davies sale

3-5m ey 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' />

Deluded fans.Now i see sky sports have jumped on this Bs Bandwagon.This Bs will be cleared by the end of the week.He was never leaving im really suprised that it got this far.As many fans had read the article and thought it was true had rang to ask for a refund on their season ticket and were told shackell will not be sold.Clough will be heavily blamed for making articles which allow clubs to think hes for sale.Hes not for sale if a club wants to pay over the odds for him fine but whyon earth would we sell a player below his value.Deluded fans

'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' /> 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' />

What? What? I never said this.Ban this Idiot above.What an absolute Toss Pot.Have you just written that or where on earth have you copied that from as it wouldnt have been on here as its aiming at burnley fans i presume.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...