IlsonDerby Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 Regardless of whether we stay down or whether we some how go up our squad is too big. What would your squad for the beginning of next year look like? (Obviously before any new faces are brought in). I'm gonna go with my gut instinct and assume we'll fall just short of going up this year. In which case I'd fancy the following squad to go a step further next year... GK Carson, Roos, Mitchell RB Christie, Sssewankambo LB Fozzy, Olson CB(L) Shackell, Bucko CB(R) Keogh, Rawson DM Thorne, Hanson CM (Runner) Bryson, Hendrick CM (architect) Hughes, Butterfield WINGERS Camara, Russell, Ince, Another? CF Martin, Blackman/Another? I feel like a squad of this size would help to re create that feeling of team spirit that has been absent this season. It also gets rid of quite a few players who are not suited to our style of play. The only one I'm not entirely sure fits our best system of 433 is Blackman but I'm going to wait to see him play upfront with someone like Bryson in the team before I make that judgement. When he played up front centrally there was no one near him so difficult to see how that'd work because even Chrissy has struggled when no one has got close to him. What do you think? Is there anyone I've not included that you would keep? Anyone I've included that you wouldn't? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 £6m out of form but still a great player Bradley Johnson? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IlsonDerby Posted February 7, 2016 Author Share Posted February 7, 2016 2 minutes ago, Daveo said: £6m out of form but still a great player Bradley Johnson? I rate Johnson, I really do. The same way I rate Bent and (not to the same extent) Weimann. I just don't feel like they suit a 433 formation and that is the formation we have had most success with in recent years. Obviously Johnson was brilliant when he first came in but he's an expensive player to have sat on the bench because in my mind he doesn't start ahead of Bryson, Hendrick, Butterfield, Thorne and Hughes for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 1 minute ago, IlsonDerby said: I rate Johnson, I really do. The same way I rate Bent and (not to the same extent) Weimann. I just don't feel like they suit a 433 formation and that is the formation we have had most success with in recent years. Obviously Johnson was brilliant when he first came in but he's an expensive player to have sat on the bench because in my mind he doesn't start ahead of Bryson, Hendrick, Butterfield, Thorne and Hughes for me. I would like to point out that we didn't win yesterday with Bryson ,Hendrick, Baird ,Russell ,Martin and Wiemann Why not ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IlsonDerby Posted February 7, 2016 Author Share Posted February 7, 2016 1 hour ago, curtains said: I would like to point out that we didn't win yesterday with Bryson ,Hendrick, Baird ,Russell ,Martin and Wiemann Why not ! Because it was the first time this season they've played together from the beginning of the match? Give them chance to get back into it. We looked a lot better with Bryson on getting closer to Martin than without. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 4 minutes ago, IlsonDerby said: Because it was the first time this season they've played together from the beginning of the match? Give them chance to get back into it. We looked a lot better with Bryson on getting closer to Martin than without. Really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ossieram Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 Can we get rid of Curtains? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 4 minutes ago, ossieram said: Can we get rid of Curtains? You have seen the light. No I have seen the light I'm off like Mackworth This time I'm gone adios. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 Had enough of this forum and the Rams I'm off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trevor1946 Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 Will miss you but tis for the best,not the same if your hearts not in it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ossieram Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 46 minutes ago, curtains said: Had enough of this forum and the Rams I'm off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G STAR RAM Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 49 minutes ago, curtains said: Had enough of this forum and the Rams I'm off You said that in your last post too...I feel as though I can't believe you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 52 minutes ago, curtains said: Had enough of this forum and the Rams I'm off Mardarse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inglorius Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 2 hours ago, IlsonDerby said: Regardless of whether we stay down or whether we some how go up our squad is too big. What would your squad for the beginning of next year look like? (Obviously before any new faces are brought in). I'm gonna go with my gut instinct and assume we'll fall just short of going up this year. In which case I'd fancy the following squad to go a step further next year... GK Carson, Roos, Mitchell RB Christie, Sssewankambo LB Fozzy, Olson CB(L) Shackell, Bucko CB(R) Keogh, Rawson DM Thorne, Hanson CM (Runner) Bryson, Hendrick CM (architect) Hughes, Butterfield WINGERS Camara, Russell, Ince, Another? CF Martin, Blackman/Another? I feel like a squad of this size would help to re create that feeling of team spirit that has been absent this season. It also gets rid of quite a few players who are not suited to our style of play. The only one I'm not entirely sure fits our best system of 433 is Blackman but I'm going to wait to see him play upfront with someone like Bryson in the team before I make that judgement. When he played up front centrally there was no one near him so difficult to see how that'd work because even Chrissy has struggled when no one has got close to him. What do you think? Is there anyone I've not included that you would keep? Anyone I've included that you wouldn't? Sicknote George Thorne misses more games through injuries then he plays? That would effectively leave us with Hanson as our only DM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van der MoodHoover Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 11 minutes ago, curtains said: Had enough of this forum and the Rams I'm off The forum I can understand at times but don't give up on the rams! We need to stand foursquare behind them. East Herts ram has brought me out of my dark place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 2 hours ago, ossieram said: Can we get rid of Curtains? Pull yourself together man. Are you blind to his abilities? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 Locking and loading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rammieib Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 The following can go: Grant - no need to have two number ones. Carson gives me more confidence Christie - Dilly dallys, believes he is Messi, doesn't cross often enough or quick enough. Pearce/Shotton - never have given us anything. Warnock - Contract expires anyway Baird - Too old and impacts us too much when he plays Hendrick - One of the six has to go - its a difficult call as to who and I don't mind if its Hendrick or Johnson. Russell - Can do better Weimann - Can do much much better with anyone who actually does something in a game. The rest can stay - The above could generate six million in sales and probably £80-£100k off the weekly wage bill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IlsonDerby Posted February 7, 2016 Author Share Posted February 7, 2016 Just now, rammieib said: The following can go: Grant - no need to have two number ones. Carson gives me more confidence Christie - Dilly dallys, believes he is Messi, doesn't cross often enough or quick enough. Pearce/Shotton - never have given us anything. Warnock - Contract expires anyway Baird - Too old and impacts us too much when he plays Hendrick - One of the six has to go - its a difficult call as to who and I don't mind if its Hendrick or Johnson. Russell - Can do better Weimann - Can do much much better with anyone who actually does something in a game. The rest can stay - The above could generate six million in sales and probably £80-£100k off the weekly wage bill. Harsh on Christie IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IlsonDerby Posted February 7, 2016 Author Share Posted February 7, 2016 1 hour ago, Inglorius said: Sicknote George Thorne misses more games through injuries then he plays? That would effectively leave us with Hanson as our only DM 25 appearances this season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.