irobinson Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 DET talking about Ince and Wiemen separately - gotta be a twin strategy though, hasnt it ? or could we land both - and move Jonny on...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 DET talking about Ince and Wiemen separately - gotta be a twin strategy though, hasnt it ? or could we land both - and move Jonny on......How? We had Ince last year... so it's Weimann for Ward in theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irobinson Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 How? We had Ince last year... so it's Weimann for Ward in theory.i was thinking that the Wiemen interest was because we couldn't get Ince (and the deal had gone cold) but it seems to infer that we are tracking both Ince and Wiemen to buy both. If that was the case - Wardy has gone - and they would probably release Jonny Russell - 2 in 2 out. Sorry if my thinking in my head wasnt translated into text... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 i was thinking that the Wiemen interest was because we couldn't get Ince (and the deal had gone cold) but it seems to infer that we are tracking both Ince and Wiemen to buy both. If that was the case - Wardy has gone - and they would probably release Jonny Russell - 2 in 2 out. Sorry if my thinking in my head wasnt translated into text...But that still doesn't make sense. Because Ince was in the numbers anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheron85 Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 i was thinking that the Wiemen interest was because we couldn't get Ince (and the deal had gone cold) but it seems to infer that we are tracking both Ince and Wiemen to buy both. If that was the case - Wardy has gone - and they would probably release Jonny Russell - 2 in 2 out. Sorry if my thinking in my head wasnt translated into text...Nah... Weimann for Ward... Plus we still need to replace Lingard surely?End of last year we had Ward, Russell, Dawkins, Ince and Lingard...Now we have Russell and Dawkins... with suggestions that Dawkins may be moving to a more central role.IF the new coach decides we still need 4 wingers I'd suggest that having Russell, Ince, Weimann and Dawkins wouldn;t be far off a plan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irobinson Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 But that still doesn't make sense. Because Ince was in the numbers anyway.not in my numbers - hes a loan - hes gone back - like Lingard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StringerBell Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 Ince will replace Ince Shirley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irobinson Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 i like how - on another string we have people quoting how many Ince will score this season.....he aint our player or have I missed the signing!!!....he's gone back!!! and his Dad is talking him up in Europe!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 All this talk of he's a replacement for him etc. there's no rules that we must have x amount of wingers and if 2 leave 2 must come in.Clement may want more or less than what we had.Seen people saying we don't need another out and out striker, where's the back up if we're playing 2 up top? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StringerBell Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 All this talk of he's a replacement for him etc. there's no rules that we must have x amount of wingers and if 2 leave 2 must come in.Clement may want more or less than what we had.Seen people saying we don't need another out and out striker, where's the back up if we're playing 2 up top? I think that's one of the reasons we're going for Wiemann - has played as part of a front 2 and out wide Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North_Stand_Ram Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 All this talk of he's a replacement for him etc. there's no rules that we must have x amount of wingers and if 2 leave 2 must come in.Clement may want more or less than what we had.Seen people saying we don't need another out and out striker, where's the back up if we're playing 2 up top? Exactly. People just think Clement will play the same style as McClaren. Says who? I'm sure he's done due diligence on the squad and is planning his system already. He's also going to need pre season games to test them out... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irobinson Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 I guess in that light, i agree, Wiemen could play wide and up top....so Ince and Wiemen could be both targets for us....i just get the feeling - someone will be released - who we may be sad about I can also we a couple of surprise season loans....i hope so - hopefully from Spain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leicester Ram Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 Cant wait to see have someone with 'Wiemann' on their shirt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimmu Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 He surely is flexible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RLACML Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 Nah... Weimann for Ward... Plus we still need to replace Lingard surely?End of last year we had Ward, Russell, Dawkins, Ince and Lingard...Now we have Russell and Dawkins... with suggestions that Dawkins may be moving to a more central role.IF the new coach decides we still need 4 wingers I'd suggest that having Russell, Ince, Weimann and Dawkins wouldn;t be far off a plan?Are you referring to the talk on here or has anybody from the club actually said this? Just wondering as I haven't been on here for a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram a lamb a ding dong Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 Calero in with a sniff. Russell may/ may not go. We'll go with 4-2-3-1 so dont really need an out and out wideman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheron85 Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 Are you referring to the talk on here or has anybody from the club actually said this? Just wondering as I haven't been on here for a while. Going by that's where he seemed to be coming on for the last few times he played last season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cam the Ram Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 To get the Derby moved sorted obviously Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walsall_Ram Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 I'd expect this to turn into a loan move if we're forced to pay the "6 million" upfront fee for Ince.Weimann has a year left on his contract too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthernRam Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 I'd expect this to turn into a loan move if we're forced to pay the "6 million" upfront fee for Ince.Weimann has a year left on his contract too.Doubt it - Sherwood will want the cash to rebuild - £1.5m for Weimann, £3m for Ince #ITK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.