DublinRam Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 1 1 ward fgs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leicester Ram Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 We'd get bullied with Wardy and Martin up front, the championship is too physical. Martin should be the striker we finally have to play off Sammon and see if he's actually as **** as you all say he is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eranio20 Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 Think we will get something out of the game, a 1-1 or a narrow win. Think Zaha is injured, didn't play yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SillyBilly Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 Derby 1 Palace 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uttoxram75 Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 4-2 to us. Hendrick fgs, great game from start to finish, played at breakneck pace with skill, verve and total commitment. I'm feckin working 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':(' /> stick yer feckin friday nights up yer feckin arse 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/angry' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':angry:' /> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DcFc Dyycheee Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 Most ridiculous thing I've seen. I think this'll be a draw 1-1 with Sammon starting or not.. I just think it'll be a game with few chances. We need people in the team that will actually put the ball in the net. That's why if he starts, I don't think we'll win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 I just think it'll be a game with few chances. We need people in the team that will actually put the ball in the net. That's why if he starts, I don't think we'll win. Sorry, the ridiculous thing was the baring that Sammon playing meant they would score twice, and without him they wouldn't score at all. If you believe that Sammon means we'll have no goal threat, then yeah, that's fair enough but how is he not playing going to stop them from scoring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DcFc Dyycheee Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 Sorry, the ridiculous thing was the baring that Sammon playing meant they would score twice, and without him they wouldn't score at all. If you believe that Sammon means we'll have no goal threat, then yeah, that's fair enough but how is he not playing going to stop them from scoring. Well, in some games there's 'turning points' and that can happen with people missing easy chances. Say if we went up field and Sammon shoots wide from 6 yards out, the other team then go on to score. (Not all the time though) But it's happened with before, a few times last season and this season. (P'Boro away etc.) So that's why I think if we have players that will actually put the ball in the net, and we went 2-0 up, it would be hard for them to come back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 Well, in some games there's 'turning points' and that can happen with people missing easy chances. Say if we went up field and Sammon shoots wide from 6 yards out, the other team then go on to score. (Not all the time though) But it's happened with before, a few times last season and this season. (P'Boro away etc.) So that's why I think if we have players that will actually put the ball in the net, and we went 2-0 up, it would be hard for them to come back. Now, I could be wrong but isn't Sammons problem getting into positions for chances, I don't think he misses many sitters and he creates a lot himself. I'll be honest, I like Sammon and think he is far better than made out to be here.. nice to have a striker willing to put himself about, not a prolific player but none-the-less is a battering ram upfront, which I like to see as apposed to Varney type players like sit in pockets for the full 90. I don't think Sammon is a player that will have a massive baring on the result, I must admit - he could definitely be improved upon, but far from our worst player, far, far from it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DcFc Dyycheee Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 Now, I could be wrong but isn't Sammons problem getting into positions for chances, I don't think he misses many sitters and he creates a lot himself. I'll be honest, I like Sammon and think he is far better than made out to be here.. nice to have a striker willing to put himself about, not a prolific player but none-the-less is a battering ram upfront, which I like to see as apposed to Varney type players like sit in pockets for the full 90. I don't think Sammon is a player that will have a massive baring on the result, I must admit - he could definitely be improved upon, but far from our worst player, far, far from it. I've seen him quite a few times f*ck it up in front of goal.. he always takes 1-2 too many touches, and that's what I have a problem with.. instead of shooting the ball in the net, he ALWAYS takes too long. I like Sammon, I like his work rate, link up play etc.. but now we have Chris Martin, who apparently is the same sort of player, I'll much rather see him play as he looks more clinical. If we take our chances, they won't win, if we miss chances, like I think we will with Sammon up front, they'll win. Just my opinion though. I've just lost patience having a striker who can't score. I mean, what is the point in that!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 I've seen him quite a few times f*ck it up in front of goal.. he always takes 1-2 too many touches, and that's what I have a problem with.. instead of shooting the ball in the net, he ALWAYS takes too long. I like Sammon, I like his work rate, link up play etc.. but now we have Chris Martin, who apparently is the same sort of player, I'll much rather see him play as he looks more clinical. If we take our chances, they won't win, if we miss chances, like I think we will with Sammon up front, they'll win. Just my opinion though. I've just lost patience having a striker who can't score. I mean, what is the point in that!? Fair enough, I want to see Martin play and see what he can offer - That means if Sammon is dropped, he is dropped - I just don't think he is the difference between us winning or losing. He has been no worse than Bryson, Hughes, Roberts, Coutts...etc recently but seems to be made into a scapegoat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shuff264 Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 2-1 Hendrick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neon Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 2-0 Wardy and Martin, Martin not starting and replacing Wardy or Sammon later on.. Freezing cold.. 21-000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alph Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 Rams 0-3 Palarse. Murray FGS. Attendance - pooh Atmosphere - horrific Weather - cold Booing - present Sammon - 3 passes, 1 shot Forum - meltdown Completely - depressed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bris Vegas Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 Sorry, the ridiculous thing was the baring that Sammon playing meant they would score twice, and without him they wouldn't score at all. If you believe that Sammon means we'll have no goal threat, then yeah, that's fair enough but how is he not playing going to stop them from scoring. Because goals change games... A team 1-0 up now doesn't have to chase and can counter... It's amazing how much a goal can change the complete outlook on a game.. Some teams just kick on after scoring, while others fall apart when conceding.. One of the biggest examples was the Leicester game away.. Had we not scored leicester could have won that game 6-0, but that Theo goal completely changed the game.. And then it was Leicester who scored the vital 4th goal, whioch deflated us.. That game could quite easily have been 6-0 to them, 2-2, 2-3 or 2-4 to us but it ended up 4-1 to them.. The goals changed everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 Derby 3 Palace 1 fgs Hendrick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
needles Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 Roberts wil be back. Panic over. 2-0 Derby. (Martin, Hendrick) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leicester Ram Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 Roberts wil be back. Panic over. 2-0 Derby. (Martin, Hendrick) yes! some new slaphead to moan about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zippy Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Rams 1 - Palace 2 (FGS Ward) I think March is going to be a tail of woe, as we gracefully abseil down the table 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':(' /> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mary Hindge Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Derby 3 - 0 Palace FGS Sammon We find our form at home agian, the forum has nothing to speak about...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.