AndyinLiverpool

It went in. It will always go in unless a goalkeeper managed to save it. Because it was on target. And since you don't have time to bet between Rashford shooting and it going in, it's not helpful. Will it guide you in your betting?

0.3 chance of Rashford's goal going in, apparently. What cobblers.

He said the sheriff is near

Derek Hales

Give over. It's nothing like that.

Such a disappointment. To be in such a strong position before start of play to this it couldn't have gone much worse. Can still win though. Gonna take something superhuman. Time for the captain to have a bowl.

Today's gone pretty poorly so far. We'll have to bat bloody well in the lower order to get a lead anywhere near 300.

'Hans, our hats have got skulls on them.'

zzzzzzzzzz

Our quicks being able to hit those cracks will be crucial. The ball was jagging about a bit and the one that got Stokes practically rolled along the ground

He was a miserable sod

Nice. Could you follow that up with the names of the people in the 'Fun fact' section?

My wife thinks I'm quaintly old-fashioned for still calling them 'sides'. I'm glad to see I'm not the only one.

400 sovs- blimey. They definitely won't fall apart quicker than a fraudulent university either.

Nice to wake up to this. What a shambles.

there's still time

You clearly haven't been to Ireland for a while

I've never heard of TNT sports

Has anyone researched the success rate in gambling of expected goals over, say, tossing a coin or chucking a dart?

Hence the song 'Panic' by the Smiths - Wright played some syrupy Wham song right after a news flash about Chernobyl.

Rod stewart-a-like Alan Biley

A ref is disinterested, as in unbiased. Not an ionterest in one side or another.

uninterested

To what end?

I don't understand this. Expected goals is more representative than actual goals? What are they more represetative of?