Bluedogmaz Posted May 23, 2011 Share Posted May 23, 2011 This is brilliant - Just click on send to friend and add your mates details http://europeansportsnews.paddypower.com/index.php?fn=Free+Sports+Tips+At&ln=www.betfan.co.uk&nc=www.betfan.co.uk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted May 23, 2011 Share Posted May 23, 2011 He was leaving subtle clues http://tapatalk.com/mu/c1238407-d128-4573 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastKentRam Posted May 23, 2011 Share Posted May 23, 2011 http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1418702/imogen_thomas_topless_photoshoot_for_zoo_magazine/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralRam Posted May 23, 2011 Share Posted May 23, 2011 http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1418702/imogen_thomas_topless_photoshoot_for_zoo_magazine/ Why don't you just get her vid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastKentRam Posted May 23, 2011 Share Posted May 23, 2011 Why don't you just get her vid? Dont really like the camera work in that and she aint as f*t without makeup on. Only good part is when the geezer pulls out and bolts on her at the end, mainly cos the camera is closer then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamNut Posted May 23, 2011 Share Posted May 23, 2011 look you, she's a good lass, good to her mam, goes to chapel every sunday, and likes to help the young man with his organ. whats the problem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrsRam Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 Sky Sources: Van of masked men attacks paparazzi outside Ryan Giggs' home in Greater Manchester :eek: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrsRam Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 And don't mention it infront of SAF; http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/may/24/fergie-orders-giggs-reporter-banned?CMP=twt_fd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smyth_18 Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 Unbelievable. Alex Ferguson wants somebody to lose their job for asking a question about an unfaithful, cheating scumbag of a man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladyram Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 Too right - what a total tw*t Giggs is. Absolutely feck all respect for his wife and those 2 kids. It's them I feel sorry for. :mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 http://images.travelpod.com/users/christina_lam/1.1247012317.saggy-beach-dog I don't know why I feel the need to post this particular picture up, but to me this dogs face tells the whole story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdinburghRam Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 Unbelievable. Alex Ferguson wants somebody to lose their job for asking a question about an unfaithful, cheating scumbag of a man. hardly. It was an inappropriate question to ask SAF, I would be just as angry if I was him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duracell Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 Too right - what a total tw*t Giggs is. Absolutely feck all respect for his wife and those 2 kids. It's them I feel sorry for. :mad: Yes. It's definitely them I feel sorry for. It's something he and his family should go through alone though. Am I alone in thinking the kids would be better off without the paparazzi camped outside their home and their father making the main news for all the wrong reasons? That's what Giggs was protecting them against, they all must have known about the affair anyway. Also, there's another issue here - it's actually none of our business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uttoxram75 Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 Yes. It's definitely them I feel sorry for. It's something he and his family should go through alone though. Am I alone in thinking the kids would be better off without the paparazzi camped outside their home and their father making the main news for all the wrong reasons? That's what Giggs was protecting them against, they all must have known about the affair anyway. Also, there's another issue here - it's actually none of our business. Agree Bunny, if the rich and powerful admitted their infidelities when caught, the fuss would quickly die down allowing them to get on with their lives. These gagging orders/super-injunctions just make every fooker want to know who's hiding what. This weeks Private Eye says there are currently 53 super injunctions in this country to their definite knowledge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duracell Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 Agree Bunny, if the rich and powerful admitted their infidelities when caught, the fuss would quickly die down allowing them to get on with their lives. These gagging orders/super-injunctions just make every fooker want to know who's hiding what. This weeks Private Eye says there are currently 53 super injunctions in this country to their definite knowledge. It doesn't matter to anyone what Ryan Giggs has done with is willy apart from his wife and kids, and Imogen Thomas' boyfriend if she has one. These super-injuctions would, in theory, have kept it that way. Why should Ryan Giggs have to admit his infidelities to us? He's a football, not a religious figure (although, in this country....) I don't think it matters if the fuss would "die down", there shouldn't have to be any fuss in the first place. This affair happened a while ago - what if Giggs admitted it to his family, he had been forgiven, and the family were in a rebuilding process? Or if the bugger hadn't even told them, would it not have been better for his family not to find out at all than through the media? For me, it makes Ryan Giggs' attempt to gag the press perfectly fair and reasonable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamNut Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 http://images.travelpod.com/users/christina_lam/1.1247012317.saggy-beach-dog I don't know why I feel the need to post this particular picture up, but to me this dogs face tells the whole story. beef curtains? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uttoxram75 Posted May 25, 2011 Share Posted May 25, 2011 It doesn't matter to anyone what Ryan Giggs has done with is willy apart from his wife and kids, and Imogen Thomas' boyfriend if she has one. These super-injuctions would, in theory, have kept it that way. Why should Ryan Giggs have to admit his infidelities to us? He's a football, not a religious figure (although, in this country....) I don't think it matters if the fuss would "die down", there shouldn't have to be any fuss in the first place. This affair happened a while ago - what if Giggs admitted it to his family, he had been forgiven, and the family were in a rebuilding process? Or if the bugger hadn't even told them, would it not have been better for his family not to find out at all than through the media? For me, it makes Ryan Giggs' attempt to gag the press perfectly fair and reasonable. My apologies Bunny, in the previous post I thought you was talking sense, I must have misunderstood! If your famous and you get caught knobbing someone other than your wife/husband then the press are going to print it. Its a fact of modern life. The papers seem convinced that we want to read about it. All a super injunction will do is build up interest about who or what is the subject. By not taking out the injunctions the press melee will die down quicker so giving his family a bit of space and time to sort themselves out. It happens all the time to ordinary people. Once it comes out, the family have to cope with the neighbours, friends, workmates and families gossiping and knowing that you've been nobbing away from home. OK its not all over the press, but at least, if you are a multi-millionaire you can easily disappear to the other side of the world if you wanted to. I really don't care what Giggs gets up to, Its the ridiculous super injunctions that actually makes it worse for his family in the long run. Anyway, the internet is making these injunctions look even dafter than they already are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamNut Posted May 25, 2011 Share Posted May 25, 2011 tbh...is it really a big deal in this day and age? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladyram Posted May 25, 2011 Share Posted May 25, 2011 tbh...is it really a big deal in this day and age? Not to Joe Public Ramnut - but it's a hell of a big deal to his wife and family. The press will jump on it more sometimes because Giggs is portrayed to be this quiet family man, they will do anything to dish the dirt because at the end of the day it sells newspapers. They really don't give a rats ass who gets hurt in the process. It wouldn't hurt for them to think of the pain caused to those kids, not just by what Giggsy has done - their own actions are not helping but they don't think of that, for them it's all about money. The paparazzi have no scruples and will never accept the concept of knowing when to back off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duracell Posted May 25, 2011 Share Posted May 25, 2011 My apologies Bunny, in the previous post I thought you was talking sense, I must have misunderstood! If your famous and you get caught knobbing someone other than your wife/husband then the press are going to print it. Its a fact of modern life. The papers seem convinced that we want to read about it. All a super injunction will do is build up interest about who or what is the subject. By not taking out the injunctions the press melee will die down quicker so giving his family a bit of space and time to sort themselves out. It happens all the time to ordinary people. Once it comes out, the family have to cope with the neighbours, friends, workmates and families gossiping and knowing that you've been nobbing away from home. OK its not all over the press, but at least, if you are a multi-millionaire you can easily disappear to the other side of the world if you wanted to. I really don't care what Giggs gets up to, Its the ridiculous super injunctions that actually makes it worse for his family in the long run. Anyway, the internet is making these injunctions look even dafter than they already are. Uttox, I may be young and naiive, but I know all of the things you mention. But how could Giggs have foreseen exactly how it would have panned out? The whole thing has been unprecedented. Of course the super-injuction is a farce. I was just defending Ryan Giggs' action in taking a super-injuction out. I can see why he did it. I'm not defending his affair or anything like that, so I think I was talking sense... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.