RamLad1884 Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 Gary Rowett has come out yesterday stating a Fulham midfielder should be banned for the playoffs after an alleged elbow on a Birmingham player at the weekend. This is a game that has nothing to do with Gary directly, and he's certainly not in a position to comment. Maybe it's an attempt at bringing up the drama between the two teams for tomorrow, in the same way Warnock (and to an extent Gary) did for the Cardiff game? Source: https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/fulham-ace-should-banned-championsip-1550057 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 Definitely should be banned. It was awful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Kevin Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 Probably motivate them, should not have commented on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 6 minutes ago, King Kevin said: Probably motivate them, should not have commented on it. We are the motivated ones. Watch out Fulham Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irobinson Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 I don't like this...let the FA deal with stuff.....not professional Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 Just now, irobinson said: I don't like this...let the FA deal with stuff.....not professional That’s just it they haven’t dealt with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 6 minutes ago, curtains said: That’s just it they haven’t dealt with it. The bit I read said because there was a free kick there won't be retrospective action. Probably just planting the seed that these Fulham guys do stick their elbows out. It is text book Warnock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 Just now, RadioactiveWaste said: The bit I read said because there was a free kick there won't be retrospective action. Probably just planting the seed that these Fulham guys do stick their elbows out. It is text book Warnock. Don’t think it’s Warnock mate. Watched it 5 highlights and thought he will banned retrospectively for that. London bias I reckon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 Are you a Derby fan Bris http://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2018/05/10/tt-why-half-the-premier-league-will-be-rooting-for-derby-to-beat/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ViewsFromTheMiddle Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 2 minutes ago, curtains said: Are you a Derby fan Bris http://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2018/05/10/tt-why-half-the-premier-league-will-be-rooting-for-derby-to-beat/ What's wrong with what he's said? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brady1993 Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 34 minutes ago, RamLad1884 said: Gary Rowett has come out yesterday stating a Fulham midfielder should be banned for the playoffs after an alleged elbow on a Birmingham player at the weekend. This is a game that has nothing to do with Gary directly, and he's certainly not in a position to comment. Maybe it's an attempt at bringing up the drama between the two teams for tomorrow, in the same way Warnock (and to an extent Gary) did for the Cardiff game? Source: https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/fulham-ace-should-banned-championsip-1550057 In fairness if you read his actual comments they are a lot tamer than the headline makes out and feel like he's more responding to a question proposed to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angieram Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 So you think Rowett just made this statement out of the blue? This was highly likely to have been a question deliberately asked at the Press Conference by a Telegraph reporter, which forced Rowett into giving a response thus creating a 'story' for them to write up and circulate before tomorrow night's match. They don't care if it reflects negatively on Rowett or the club. Derby Telegraph 'journalism' at its worst. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brady1993 Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 5 minutes ago, angieram said: So you think Rowett just made this statement out of the blue? This was highly likely to have been a question deliberately asked at the Press Conference by a Telegraph reporter, which forced Rowett into giving a response thus creating a 'story' for them to write up and circulate before tomorrow night's match. They don't care if it reflects negatively on Rowett or the club. Derby Telegraph 'journalism' at its worst. What's funny is Rowett never actually uses the words "ban" or "banned" at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 Siege mentality won’t do us any harm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OohMartWright Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 May also be a not-so-subtle attempt by the DT to influence tomorrow's ref into thinking Fulham are a dirty side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irobinson Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 Let’s get on with the match Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramarena Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 Manager is asked his opinion on a incident and gives it shocker! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Sagan Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 5 hours ago, King Kevin said: Probably motivate them, should not have commented on it. 5 hours ago, irobinson said: I don't like this...let the FA deal with stuff.....not professional When you read the full story, Rowett said nothing controversial whatsoever and certainly didn't call for the player to be banned. However I disagree with the implied criticism from both of you. In the modern game I want our manager to sow seeds in referee's minds before big games. If we were playing the gumps I'd want him to say pre match what an outrageous diver Brereton is. Here, it would be a good tactic to point out that just because people think Fulham play pretty football, it doesn't stop them being really dirty off the ball and referees should be watching for that. Maybe that's what he's done here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G STAR RAM Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 7 hours ago, RamLad1884 said: Gary Rowett has come out yesterday stating a Fulham midfielder should be banned for the playoffs after an alleged elbow on a Birmingham player at the weekend. This is a game that has nothing to do with Gary directly, and he's certainly not in a position to comment. Maybe it's an attempt at bringing up the drama between the two teams for tomorrow, in the same way Warnock (and to an extent Gary) did for the Cardiff game? Source: https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/fulham-ace-should-banned-championsip-1550057 Do you have any links to the article where Rowett has 'come out stating that a Fulham midfielder should be banned'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Kevin Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 2 hours ago, Carl Sagan said: When you read the full story, Rowett said nothing controversial whatsoever and certainly didn't call for the player to be banned. However I disagree with the implied criticism from both of you. In the modern game I want our manager to sow seeds in referee's minds before big games. If we were playing the gumps I'd want him to say pre match what an outrageous diver Brereton is. Here, it would be a good tactic to point out that just because people think Fulham play pretty football, it doesn't stop them being really dirty off the ball and referees should be watching for that. Maybe that's what he's done here? Fair play it's your opinion ,but if I agreed with you we'd both be wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.