FrostedRam Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 So it's fairly common knowledge we have a couple of bad eggs in the dressing room. Who at the drop of a hat go running to Morris and get managers the sack. In the opinion of the forum, who do we believe these players to be. As these have to be the first players out by Rowett. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sith Happens Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Just now, FrostedRam said: So it's fairly common knowledge we have a couple of bad eggs in the dressing room. Who at the drop of a hat go running to Morris and get managers the sack. In the opinion of the forum, who do we believe these players to be. As these have to be the first players out by Rowett. Humpty Dumpty is one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rampant Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 If it was "fairly common knowledge" then we'd already know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrostedRam Posted March 13, 2017 Author Share Posted March 13, 2017 Just now, Rampant said: If it was "fairly common knowledge" then we'd already know. It's been mentioned in two manager sackings that players have influenced the decision, but never specified who the players are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TobyWanKenobi Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 5 minutes ago, FrostedRam said: So it's fairly common knowledge we have a couple of bad eggs in the dressing room. Who at the drop of a hat go running to Morris and get managers the sack. In the opinion of the forum, who do we believe these players to be. As these have to be the first players out by Rowett. I'm apparently not part of this apparent common knowledge. If it was common knowledge, wouldn't we know who? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sith Happens Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Just now, FrostedRam said: It's been mentioned in two manager sackings that players have influenced the decision, but never specified who the players are. Mentioned by who? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pearl Ram Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 We can guess but for anyone to come out and say it's so and so could lead to problems for the forum and that would be bad form. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrostedRam Posted March 13, 2017 Author Share Posted March 13, 2017 Just now, EastHertsRam said: We can guess but for anyone to come out and say it's so and so could lead to problems for the forum and that would be bad form. Can't see people's opinions being an issue for the forum. Because that's all it is and opinion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrostedRam Posted March 13, 2017 Author Share Posted March 13, 2017 4 minutes ago, Paul71 said: Mentioned by who? You obviously only have a limited reading list. Because it's been mentioned on here as well as numerous media sources Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pearl Ram Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Just now, FrostedRam said: Can't see people's opinions being an issue for the forum. Because that's all it is and opinion Ok Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrostedRam Posted March 13, 2017 Author Share Posted March 13, 2017 5 minutes ago, TobyWanKenobi said: I'm apparently not part of this apparent common knowledge. If it was common knowledge, wouldn't we know who? Really it has been mentioned a few times even in the last few days. It may be gossip in the media. but generally no smoke without fire Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
May Contain Nuts Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 5 minutes ago, FrostedRam said: generally no smoke without fire No bullshit without a shitting bull Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 4 minutes ago, FrostedRam said: Really it has been mentioned a few times even in the last few days. It may be gossip in the media. but generally no smoke without fire You might be correct about your original supposition, but I'm afraid that you have just lost the argument by resorting to that little highlighted bit of applied prattery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sith Happens Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 5 minutes ago, FrostedRam said: You obviously only have a limited reading list. Because it's been mentioned on here as well as numerous media sources I'd trust idle gossip on here as much as idle gossip in the tabloids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pearl Ram Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 1 minute ago, eddie said: You might be correct about your original supposition, but I'm afraid that you have just lost the argument by resorting to that little highlighted bit of applied prattery. Textbook Eddie, good to have you back firing on all six. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrostedRam Posted March 13, 2017 Author Share Posted March 13, 2017 There was talk from a journalist last night suggesting it wasn't the old players this time. So that's saying there's a rift in the dressing room. Doesnt bode well for the future. Rowett will need to decide which side he sits on and get rid of there other lot. Will be interesting to see if he sticks with the new lot or the old guard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GboroRam Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Shall I rename this thread the "libel a player" thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pearl Ram Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 4 minutes ago, GboroRam said: Shall I rename this thread the "libel a player" thread? But it's only an opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrostedRam Posted March 13, 2017 Author Share Posted March 13, 2017 4 minutes ago, GboroRam said: Shall I rename this thread the "libel a player" thread? You could do but that would surely draw the solicitors attention to it,? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ram1964 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Keogh as captain,must presumably have the players go to him first with regards issuies and then presumably he iether tells erm to put up or shut up.So assuming keogh has been involved by advocating or supporting players Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.