Srg Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth's left foot Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Tossers,i'm not paying my council tax then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MackworthRamIsGod Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Idiotic decision, people living in properties built on green belt land protesting against something being built on green belt land. This building was for the good of the city of Derby, would hardly have generated any pollution compared to the houses locally already built on green belt land. I suppose the money saved helps to pay off Clement so maybe Mel sees it as a blessing in disguise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted February 11, 2016 Author Share Posted February 11, 2016 Sure we can appeal this? Doubt it'll be the last of it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MackworthRamIsGod Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 A nice little back handed and a tin of quality streets to the planning department should swing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashz09 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 What a silly decision.. Would of not created more traffic really most likely create more jobs etc.. Strange one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ossieram Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Kin idiots All Derby fans living in the Erewash area need to contact the council and tell them that they will be losing votes if this is not overturned again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philc130 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I live in the house next door to moor farm. please don't label me a tosser I said yes to the plans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RicME85 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 There was only 5 actual complaints. Ridiculous. I take it they wont turn down applications for the other end of Oakwood for housing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted February 11, 2016 Author Share Posted February 11, 2016 Pretty sure you could just start a petition... 30 thousand signatures from the iPro and then door to door round Oakwood and Chad, job done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ossieram Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 1 hour ago, RicME85 said: There was only 5 actual complaints. Ridiculous. I take it they wont turn down applications for the other end of Oakwood for housing? Find them and sort them out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkFruitsRam7 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 2 hours ago, ossieram said: Find them and sort them out Someone call Bucko... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Ram Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 What grounds has it been rejected on? Might be a case of making a few ammendments to drawings revise the design & access statement to suit the conservation and local authority then reapply for planning permission Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CornwallRam Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 If the council continue to make life difficult, Mel should sell Moor Farm to a property developer - new housing developments are a government priority and developers can appeal any local rejections, so may well get planning permission. See how the objectors like having 500 new houses on the site. Mel could then buy up the old Celanese site. There'd be no problems with planning as literally anything is better than a stinky hazardous chemical factory. It's also within the City boundaries so less complicated planning issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEL Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Idiots!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 45 minutes ago, Derby_EnglandLoyal said: Idiots!!!! Gumps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Sagan Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 Only just spotted this. There's an article in the DET: http://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/Derby-County-Club-surprised-disappointed/story-28716253-detail/story.html It includes the following passage: Quote Councillor Daniel Walton, who represents Sawley ward, had always been against the plans and was among the committee members who voted for refusal. He said one difference between last night and when the go-ahead was given in December was that the councillors were aware of concerns about how the light from the extension would affect residents. Mr Walton said: "I was always against it. I don't think there are any special circumstances for developing within our greenbelt. "I don't want Erewash to be a community that's a suburb of Derby city." Anyone who has a vote in his ward, please get rid of Councillor Walton at the first possible opportunity. The impact of the "light from the extension" must be completely nonexistent with such a low-level extension a considerable way from the residential properties. Make up your own minds, but to me it sounds vindictive and someone who want DCFC to fail at all costs. I'll say again (as I did in the original thread about the plans) that football clubs have a vast amount of power in local politics, as evidenced by succussful actions by fans of other clubs who were bothered enough to stand for election on a platform of approving planning applications for their clubs - and made their councils change their minds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Am Sheep Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 Because this extension would have caused major issues for the residents of... SAWLEY? **** me no wonder it was rejected when more than half of Erewash Council must be made up of bitter gumps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alph Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 There are no special cases for developing within our greenbelt he says surrounded by new housing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MackworthRamIsGod Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 I say rollocks to the councillors and rollocks to the pratts in planning, just build it. If planners come knocking send Jake out to sort em. This really is a case of a Foresr supporting councillor rejecting a plan out of sheer jealousy. I hope Mel relocates Moor Farm and sticks one finger up at Erewash, just because he can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.