davenportram Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 That's not allowed though!! Yes it is - us to west brom can we speak to Thorne WBA to us - if you want but he's not for sale Us to WBA okay well chat then make you an offer to see if we can change your mind. No rules broken in that scenario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RLACML Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 They can't approach the player without West Brom's permission. Why would they give permission without a fee being agreed? They want to keep him & are already pissed off about the stuff Thorne has said publicly. They don't want to keep him, they just want top dolla for him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StaffsRam Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 That's not allowed though!! As has been said, it is if WBA gave us permission to talk to the player. Given that WBA would probably be shouting from the rooftops if we'd spoken to Thorne without their permission then either they have given it, or GT hasn't really agreed terms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rynny Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 That's not allowed though!!See my post above. I guess it kind of goes we put a bid in it gets rejected but we get permission to speak to Thorne we agree terms with Thorne and then carry on negotiating with WBA. Hence no tapping up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaryDCFC Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 Well we need to give up now from what I understand as he has just altered his co tract terms to suggest they now see him as a Key Player Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StaffsRam Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 Well we need to give up now from what I understand as he has just altered his co tract terms to suggest they now see him as a Key Player That sounds like something you can do on FM..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RLACML Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 Has Alan Irvine also gone on holiday? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gritstone Ram Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 Didn't bryson speak to burnley or was that because of the Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 This isnt a hostage situation. We can hardly send in food that will give them all the shiits. No need. Have you ever eaten in West Bromwich? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 Well we need to give up now from what I understand as he has just altered his co tract terms to suggest they now see him as a Key Player Cobblers. You're making this garbage up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BondJovi Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 ITK....may as well be replaced with CB... Clueless Bollauex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramarena Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 Has Alan Irvine also gone on holiday? Won't be long till he gets a very long holiday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomBustler1884 Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 John vicars has retweeted Brett Wilson's game of thornes picture. He wouldn't be retweeting that if he wasn't optimistic about Thorne coming, just gives himvgrief later otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tombo Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 That sounds like something you can do on FM..... It is, I think that was the joke he was making. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butros Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 No point agreeing a fee with WBA if Thorne won't agree with us. Really? I've quite often heard of clubs agreeing a fee then the deal falling through because the player can't agree personal terms, usually when we try to sign someone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hans Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 245 pages?! He's still no closer to signing unless we table a serious bid. (Hopefully 2.5 million will do it) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggie79 Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 Yes it is - us to west brom can we speak to Thorne WBA to us - if you want but he's not for sale Us to WBA okay well chat then make you an offer to see if we can change your mind. No rules broken in that scenario. The most ridiculous post for a long while, why would we allow any club to talk terms with our player when no fee has been agreed. Is it ok if we discuss terms with Hughes even though we haven't agreed terms? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ossieram Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 The most ridiculous post for a long while, why would we allow any club to talk terms with our player when no fee has been agreed. Is it ok if we discuss terms with Hughes even though we haven't agreed terms? Yea go on then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philmycock Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 Is it ok if we discuss terms with Hughes even though we haven't agreed terms? Why would you? Have you got Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tricky1884 Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 The most ridiculous post for a long while, why would we allow any club to talk terms with our player when no fee has been agreed. Is it ok if we discuss terms with Hughes even though we haven't agreed terms? Because player terms can be one of the hardest parts and maybe WBA will sell at a good price. The club have to agree to it though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.