Jump to content

Alph

Member
  • Posts

    24,909
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Alph

  1. 20 minutes ago, David Graham Brown said:

    He isn’t, but like he said, it’s a much used word to close down an argument, like racist, fascist, etc.

    or antisemitic. One he uses while apologising for the Likud party and giving them a platform. 

  2. 58 minutes ago, David Graham Brown said:

    He’s very good at showing the hypocrisy of the left, and of the organisation’s LGBTetc,etc. 

    Queers for Palestine?  The people who throw gay people off the nearest high rise building for pleasure.

    He’s a very erudite man, and gay.

     

    And Islamophobic 

  3. Lord Libya Cameron out doing the media rounds. 

    Absolutely smashing it. He's like a shiny John Kirby. 

    Lots of Israelis can't go home, he said. That's unimaginable. Missile strikes could have killed thousands, he said. We can't allow that to happen. Not on our watch. If there's one thing we won't do it's stand by while people are displaced and killed on a huge scale. 

    Bravo, my Lord Brexiteer

  4. On 13/04/2024 at 17:49, DarkFruitsRam7 said:

    Yup. I can't escape them when I go on. Can't figure out whether it's because the algorithm is deliberately pushing it, or because I stupidly engage by looking at all the morons in the comments, which makes it think I'm interested in that content.

    Well, you made me Google Ben Shapiro a while back and ever since then I see his opinions everywhere. Even when his points are valid they come from a horrid place. Ignorance was bliss. 

    So may this Matt Walsh fella haunt you forever. 

  5. On 10/04/2024 at 12:36, Comrade 86 said:

    No apology required mate, I think you're just vocalising some of the same concerns many of us share. When you look at the 'tactics' employed by the IDF one might think that the raising of Gaza was done with the specific intention of making any return as challenging as possible. As it is, it's a bloody mess, quite literally.

    That said, I'm not sure I share your view about calls for a Palestinian state being poorly timed. For me, it's now or never. Pressure must be brought to bear IMO. Likewise, irrespective of how enormous the task might seem to us, I doubt the Palestinians themselves view it that way, but before any of these notions become salient, we need to see a lasting truce and I concede that this may yet prove a massive hurdle.

    On a brighter note, Blighty has at least played a minor role in the purportedly largest aid airdrop to date. Bombing the Yemen one week, aid work the next. Life in the RAF is nothing if not diverse 😑

    I listen to the podcast 'a Muslim and a Jew Go There' with Sayeeda Warsi and David Baddiel. 

    She agrees with you that there's no better time to talk about a two state solution. The world has neglected this conflict for too long. 

    You're probably right. I just don't trust the world (USA) to do what needs to be done. They already seem to be banging their war drums at Iran for daring to consider "a right to self defence". Likewise, Iran will continue to arm anyone willing to take the fight to Israel. I'm not sure they'll do anything directly but they will always threaten Israel. 

    A Palestinian State coming out of this? I can't see how Israel or America could allow it. I'm not even sure they should now. That's what I mean by too late/too early. This state would be funded and motivated to attack Israel. It's fecked. 

  6. 36 minutes ago, Comrade 86 said:

    Reports today that both Ireland and Australia might consider recognising the Palestinian state, as part of a two-state solution. Without a lasting peace, it might be argued that it's not that significant, but will other nations now break ranks too? Biden is coming under increasing pressure to further press Netanyahu for compromise and I now wonder whether an attack on Rafa seem likely at all. One hopes not. Perhaps now the greatest threat to the ceasefire and the possibility of a lasting truce may come from outside entities, which a cynic might say could have been Israel's true motivation all along. 

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-68758678

    https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/martin-says-ireland-will-recognise-palestinian-statehood-1611346.html

    I can't even begin to imagine what a Palestinian State would look like. Not now. 

    The west would demand a hand in who leads it. Palestinians would reject that. They already see the leadership in West Bank as a weak compromised government. The whole point is that Palestinians demand self determination. Would the West also deal with the extremists in Israel (which, despite the media shift, goes further than Netenyahu)? No. "Israel is a democracy". 

    If the West allowed the Palestinians the freedom to elect their leadership... we could be talking anything from a power vacuum within Palestine to a leadership emerging that would bring us back to war again. Never going to happen as you can see from the opposition view in Australia 

    We are just stuck in the mindset that Israel has the absolute right to defend itself by whatever means, to elect Zionist leaders and that it's up to the Palestinians to somehow wave it's right of self defence (trust that the Int community will defend them) and elect a suitable leadership.

    The West says Israel has moral superiority over all the Middle East. It can not be an arbiter of peace from that position. 

    Even now, they stand beside Netenyahu. They can't talk about a Palestinian State until they're prepared to tackle the Apartheid and belligerent State. They can't even stop sending weapons never mind apply international pressure.

    Apologies for cynical rant. It's just the calls for a Palestinian State are too late or too early. There couldn't be a worse time 

  7. Feels very much like we are standing at the precipice. Rafah is a bargaining chip. 

    America draw the line there with the world watching

    Netenyahu needs results. It's not that Israelis are against the war but they are against how he's handled it. 

    Hamas would sacrifice it or are willing to call the bluff. They think they're in a strong position

    With Iran and Hezbollah weighing up what they think is the best "response" and Israel are preparing for "the next stage", the clock is ticking for Palestinians. 

    I can't believe that Israel's next stage would be Rafah. Without America's blessing, with Iran and Hezbollah threatening... It just seems a length even they wouldn't go to and I feel like I've been invested long enough not to be surprised by the IDF. If they do though.... well, it won't be Russia that drag us directly into a major conflict. Might be being a bit dramatic but I just can't see any invasion of Rafah that doesn't end with a Royale Rumble.

  8. 21 minutes ago, Eddie said:

    Israel doesn't need to kill Palestinians any more - they just need to kill aid workers and let entropy do the rest.

    Clever.

    Don't forget the meddling journalists. Not the ones that are denied access. The hundred-ish others. 

  9. It's so easy to say let's get a ceasefire. So I didn't say it. In fact, I opposed it. In fact, I opposed it and offered full support to Israel. In fact, I opposed it and offered full support to Israel and gaslight people calling for a ceasefire. 

    Because when I say permanent ceasefire what I really mean is the surrender of Hamas. Which will be replaced by Hamas 2.0 because it doesn't address any of the concerns of Palestinians to have the biggest Palestinian threat to Israeli expansion destroyed. 

    And now, while i still send Israelis weapons that are being used in a possible genocide and certain war crimes I will claim that I am the only one who can the bigger picture. Which is by enabling Israel to kill Palestinians that the Palestinians and the entire region will be more inclined to accept me as the arbiter of peace. 

    An unsteady ceasefire that allows aid and  negotiation is more harmful than a bloody military campaign that stands next to no chance of being decisive without killing a significant number of the Palestinian population 

  10. I finished The Gentlemen on Netflix last night

    First two episodes were witty and take you back to the days of Lock, Stock and Snatch. Then it takes a bit of a drop and isn't really very funny or very good again. Bit of a letdown. Watchable only because the first two grab your interest 

    So I thought I'd go back and check who directed the first two. Those are the only two by Guy Ritchie. Felt a bit short changed. 

×
×
  • Create New...