Jump to content

McRainy

Member
  • Posts

    3,281
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by McRainy

  1. @RamNut Well, I think you've convinced me about the stone and the hearth, although I'd still imagine that the size/ shape/ position of the fireplace is original, because of the chimney breast, as mentioned, and because other properties in the area have similar. 

    Books: nothing on insects or Hitler, but there are a couple on Aleister Crowley! Non-fiction downstairs, philosophy, theology, psychology, mysticism, magic, art; fiction upstairs, poetry and literature. 

    I hate modernity. Our digitised, mechanised, lives take us ever further from nature and reality. We're addicted to simulacra, to the point that we can no longer tell the difference. Facebook has replaced life.

    Books and logs are real things, they have a satisfying presence. My desk was my grandfather's, and is solid oak, there are pens and paper, no computer. 

    Iphones are alright though. 

  2. 35 minutes ago, RamNut said:

    I'm guessing that the whole thing is a much later addition to a brick fireplace which in turn was a later addition to a brick or stone cottage. A relatively new bit alteration? Maybe only 20 years old with a reclaimed fire surround and mantel.

    The house is gritstone, 1850. It's clearly been messed about with, but I'm assuming the lintel and surround are original, because they fit with the chimney breast which goes right up through both floors.

    Your guess of 20 years is probably about right for the stone at the back; the previous owners were here for 25, and most likely they had it done. It's brick in the corner at the back, filling in the gap. 

    There's a weird brick bit under the stairs which looks old... somebody probably got walled up behind it in Victorian times. 

    9FA3200E-AE24-4D28-BE80-0B6ECB527A96.jpeg

×
×
  • Create New...