Ambitious Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 600k from Forest 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' /> 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' /> 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' /> as previously said, they'd struggle to make 6p. Also, this family reason seems pretty straight but what family reasons are I don't know, my money is on bucko, daveo and g-rob... 3 way, wife found out... not happy and wants him to move team 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/ph34r' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':ph34r:' /> 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wacko' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':wacko:' /> 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' /> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 1million pound and we'd struggle to find a player with the same ability, not that we'd get the million to re-invest anyway! but, Leeds don't have that sort of money to splash on any one player, so wouldn't expect it to be Leeds but could be wrong! to quote Warnock "If I get £1m I'll have to spend that on five players!" in response to the Davies bid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nookiebear Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 that 4th official chap posted this earlier "I don't think its the 'family reasons' at all, think the threat of withdrawal of investment by his clubs owners had more of an impact" that bout us then u reckon??? i dont tweet much so couldnt really work it out could be bollo as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinman Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 that 4th official chap posted this earlier "I don't think its the 'family reasons' at all, think the threat of withdrawal of investment by his clubs owners had more of an impact" that bout us then u reckon??? i dont tweet much so couldnt really work it out could be bollo as well He was on about Ole Gunar Solsjkaer and Molde Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nookiebear Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 oh right...really wernt sure...cheers for that mate 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':)' /> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nookiebear Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 just my idea not a roumer as such but what about a steve davies ross mccormack swap deal?? could work! i reckon it was rumored clough was interested before he went to leeds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramexpat Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 just my idea not a roumer as such but what about a steve davies ross mccormack swap deal?? could work! i reckon it was rumored clough was interested before he went to leeds Mccormack wants more money ,,, not going to happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-JW- Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 just my idea not a roumer as such but what about a steve davies ross mccormack swap deal?? could work! i reckon it was rumored clough was interested before he went to leeds No chance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 McCormack wouldn't want to come here, and there is no interest in Davies from Leeds at all! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McRamFan Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Don't think Leeds will be spending a lot of money, they will be looking for freebies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramexpat Posted May 25, 2012 Share Posted May 25, 2012 Davies signed a three year deal with Derby on 12 June 2008.[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Davies_(footballer_born_1987)#cite_note-1][size=2][2][/size] As the two clubs could not agree a fee for Davies, on the 26th August 2008 a tribunal ordered Derby to pay Tranmere up to £725,000 in compensation. This figure comprises an initial fee of £275,000, an extra £250,000 based on appearances and an additional £200,000 if Derby win promotion to the [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premier_League]Premiership within 3 years. So far he has made 80 apps for us ,, wouldnt suprise me we had to pay 250k if he reached 100 apps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McRamFan Posted May 25, 2012 Share Posted May 25, 2012 Davies signed a three year deal with Derby on 12 June 2008.[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Davies_(footballer_born_1987)#cite_note-1][size=2][2][/size] As the two clubs could not agree a fee for Davies, on the 26th August 2008 a tribunal ordered Derby to pay Tranmere up to £725,000 in compensation. This figure comprises an initial fee of £275,000, an extra £250,000 based on appearances and an additional £200,000 if Derby win promotion to the [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premier_League]Premiership within 3 years. So far he has made 80 apps for us ,, wouldnt suprise me we had to pay 250k if he reached 100 apps You may have a good point there. Didn't that issue arrise with Varny? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randombc Posted May 25, 2012 Share Posted May 25, 2012 So if he only cost us £275k, you'd expect us to get three times that back on a sale. This is the first player in a while we've actually bought and sold for decent profit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramexpat Posted May 25, 2012 Share Posted May 25, 2012 You may have a good point there. Didn't that issue arrise with Varny? Think it was Moxey aswell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted May 25, 2012 Share Posted May 25, 2012 If it were about appearances why would we activate the 1 year, possibly have to pay wages when we could have let him leave for free and make instant savings on wages budget? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramexpat Posted May 25, 2012 Share Posted May 25, 2012 If it were about appearances why would we activate the 1 year, possibly have to pay wages when we could have let him leave for free and make instant savings on wages budget? save 250k to Tranmere ,, get 750k transfer fee ,, winner winner chicken dinner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duncanjwitham Posted May 25, 2012 Share Posted May 25, 2012 Davies signed a three year deal with Derby on 12 June 2008.[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Davies_(footballer_born_1987)#cite_note-1][size=2][2][/size] As the two clubs could not agree a fee for Davies, on the 26th August 2008 a tribunal ordered Derby to pay Tranmere up to £725,000 in compensation. This figure comprises an initial fee of £275,000, an extra £250,000 based on appearances and an additional £200,000 if Derby win promotion to the [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premier_League]Premiership within 3 years. So far he has made 80 apps for us ,, wouldnt suprise me we had to pay 250k if he reached 100 apps I very much doubt it will be one lump sum. It's far more likely to be something like £50k for every 50 appearances or something like that. There may well be a sell-on clause though - that's quite common with tribunal set fee's at the moment. Danny Graham's tribunal fee when he signed for Watford had a 15% one included. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoggy Posted May 25, 2012 Share Posted May 25, 2012 So if he only cost us £275k, you'd expect us to get three times that back on a sale. This is the first player in a while we've actually bought and sold for decent profit! And he's a Jewell signing aswell! Who'd have thought? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimmu Posted May 26, 2012 Share Posted May 26, 2012 And he's a Jewell signing aswell! Who'd have thought? Jewell = transfer genius. Always been, always will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p.shilton Posted May 26, 2012 Share Posted May 26, 2012 Davies signed a three year deal with Derby on 12 June 2008.[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Davies_(footballer_born_1987)#cite_note-1][size=2][2][/size] As the two clubs could not agree a fee for Davies, on the 26th August 2008 a tribunal ordered Derby to pay Tranmere up to £725,000 in compensation. This figure comprises an initial fee of £275,000, an extra £250,000 based on appearances and an additional £200,000 if Derby win promotion to the [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premier_League]Premiership within 3 years. So far he has made 80 apps for us ,, wouldnt suprise me we had to pay 250k if he reached 100 apps Why would that be put down to "personal reasons"? I doubt that the Davies family would have allowed that to be said if there was not an issue. Besides- why would we sell our top scorer, disrupt the squad and probably have spend more than 250k on top of what we receive for him to "save" 250k? I know this may sound crazy but......maybe he wants to leave for personal reasons? Just throwing it out there, sometimes clubs do tell the truth you know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.