QuitYourJibbaJivin Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 If 4.5m is the correct figure I can only imagine maybe we've come to an agreement to write off some of the Vydra and Anya fees? There's no way we'd sell Will for that figure. Surely? Possibly? Hopefully? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEL Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joooools Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 BBC say £8m talks in progress. I'd insist on starting negotiations at double that figure. Will is a class act. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sexydadbod Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 Confirmed 4.5 million on sky sports, think this links back to what I said before that the Anya and Vydra remained costs will be wiped out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DcFc Dyycheee Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 WOW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuitYourJibbaJivin Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 2 minutes ago, McLovin said: Confirmed 4.5 million on sky sports, think this links back to what I said before that the Anya and Vydra remained costs will be wiped out. If we get £4.5m in cash rising to £8m, plus Vydra and Anya deals wiped off that's a fairly decent deal isn't it? If we sold to another club for £12-15m we would still have to pay Watford so it's swings and roundabouts isn't it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEL Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 Just why Gary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ariotofmyown Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 So it's either 8 million or 4 million or who knows how many million. It's in Derby's interest, Watford's interest and Hughes interest to keep the reported number low. Might be best to wait until the actual transfer goes thru and what the official amount is before going mental. And when it's undisclosed, we could wait to see what the squad is like come Septemeber before going mental about the rumoured fee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DcFc Dyycheee Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 8m rising to 10m was probably right, but 4.5m!? Honestly can't believe we've done that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mihangel Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 2 minutes ago, McLovin said: Confirmed 4.5 million on sky sports, think this links back to what I said before that the Anya and Vydra remained costs will be wiped out. Guessed at £4.5 on sky sports, guessed at £8m on BBC, guessed at £8m by John Percy, guessed at £12m by me. :-) On a serious note, one can't just report a fee as £4.5 and not mention any write off associated with it. The important thing is the value to DCFC - If that's £4.5m and £6m (another guess) written off than that's great. BTW, I'm not suggesting you're reporting that, just that it is being reported. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philc130 Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 2 minutes ago, QuitYourJibbaJivin said: If we get £4.5m in cash rising to £8m, plus Vydra and Anya deals wiped off that's a fairly decent deal isn't it? If we sold to another club for £12-15m we would still have to pay Watford so it's swings and roundabouts isn't it Think this sounds about right. Think we all need to take a deep breath and just wait and see what happens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannable Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 3 minutes ago, QuitYourJibbaJivin said: If we get £4.5m in cash rising to £8m, plus Vydra and Anya deals wiped off that's a fairly decent deal isn't it? If we sold to another club for £12-15m we would still have to pay Watford so it's swings and roundabouts isn't it That's one of the few scenarios in which I don't throw a turd at Rowett's and Melvin. If this is a buy-out clause that was stipulated when he signed his new contract then we clearly didn't learn from Bryson and Rush will be receiving a turd to the face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuitYourJibbaJivin Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 1 minute ago, philc130 said: Think this sounds about right. Think we all need to take a deep breath and just wait and see what happens Of course that's all well and good as long as they Vydra and Anya deals are wiped clean. If not it's shocking ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jortat Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 Hughes gone for 7 million on SSN ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintRam Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 I think that those suggesting the wiping of fees for Vydra, and to a lesser extent Anya, are correct, mainly due to the figures being touted being about the same as the fee we rejected from Huddersfield. That probably sees the financial gain overall at about value. I'd personally prefer a reality where we didn't have Anya or Vydra and we sold Hughes for what he is worth, and used that money to strengthen, but that's not the reality we have. I'm comfortable with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nottingram Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 If (big if) the Vydra and Anya stuff is tied in, I hope Pearson gets a Championship job. So I can spend 180 minutes this season making it absolutely clear what a tool he is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouRams Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 Hate to be "that guy" but we deserve some transparency on this one. If we still owe for example £8m to Watford and that's wiped out along with £4.5m rising to £7m then it doesn't look as bad as reading were selling our home grown fan favourite for £4.5m. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuitYourJibbaJivin Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 2 minutes ago, YouRams said: Hate to be "that guy" but we deserve some transparency on this one. If we still owe for example £8m to Watford and that's wiped out along with £4.5m rising to £7m then it doesn't look as bad as reading were selling our home grown fan favourite for £4.5m. Thinks it's definitely a question to be asked at the next Q&A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stedcfc Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 21 minutes ago, McLovin said: Confirmed 4.5 million on sky sports, think this links back to what I said before that the Anya and Vydra remained costs will be wiped out. Unfortunately I think this is very unlikely. If the Anya and Vydra debts were being written off I don't think it would affect the reported fee. It would just mean that when they came to pay us the fee they could reduce it for anything we owe them and cancel of the debts. Seems more likely that we won't actually get the £4.5m fee because we will owe Watford money for instalments on Vydra and Anya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanDan Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 3 minutes ago, YouRams said: Hate to be "that guy" but we deserve some transparency on this one. If we still owe for example £8m to Watford and that's wiped out along with £4.5m rising to £7m then it doesn't look as bad as reading were selling our home grown fan favourite for £4.5m. Agreed, someone should be explaining why the price is so low. However, should and will are two different things and I dare say we wont hear anything other than it being an undisclosed fee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.