RoyMac5 Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 4 minutes ago, curtains said: I'm not sure he will be back now. I think Fulham have an option to buy him for another 6 Million and then they could sell him on to someone else for higher price. Will all rest with Chris Martin though but Fulham could play hard ball on this and buy him and then hold out on selling him. They can't buy him without him signing. They couldn't sell him if they bought him without Martin signing. We've done this to DEATH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 4 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said: They can't buy him without him signing. They couldn't sell him if they bought him without Martin signing. We've done this to DEATH. Wrong they can buy him because they have the option on buying him for 6 Million because it's all in the loan deal of 3 million plus an extra 6 which was signed allegedly. That's how these things work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 10 minutes ago, curtains said: Wrong they can buy him because they have the option on buying him for 6 Million because it's all in the loan deal of 3 million plus an extra 6 which was signed allegedly. That's how these things work. How will they make him sign? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 1 minute ago, RoyMac5 said: How will they make him sign? He's already signed the loan deal which then follows on automatically into a permanent deal . Thats my understanding on these type of loan deals with options. It protects the clubs options in this case Fulham. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkFruitsRam7 Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 5 minutes ago, curtains said: He's already signed the loan deal which then follows on automatically into a permanent deal . Thats my understanding on these type of loan deals with options. It protects the clubs options in this case Fulham. It would be completely illegal to force Chris Martin into a contract he doesn't want to sign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 19 minutes ago, curtains said: He's already signed the loan deal which then follows on automatically into a permanent deal . Thats my understanding on these type of loan deals with options. It protects the clubs options in this case Fulham. You better tell Gary Rowett that then cos he's expecting him back next season and as said as much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 8 minutes ago, curtains said: He's already signed the loan deal which then follows on automatically into a permanent deal . Thats my understanding on these type of loan deals with options. It protects the clubs options in this case Fulham. Pretty sure that can only cover the fee between the clubs, Fulham turning the loan agreement into a permanent transfer will still need Martin to have a contract with Fulham, which may have been agreed in advance and signed, and I'm sure does happen in some cases, but I'm not convinced its the case in this instance, if nothing else, he signed that new contract at Derby and if he'd got his permanent deal at Fulham I doubt he'd have been quite so injured in January. But the transfer fee agreed in the loan agreement cannot be the same thing thing as a contract between Fulham and martin - they are two seperate contracts which may or may not have been signed at the same time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kash_a_ram_a_ding_dong Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 6 minutes ago, curtains said: He's already signed the loan deal which then follows on automatically into a permanent deal . Thats my understanding on these type of loan deals with options. It protects the clubs options in this case Fulham. Jesus not this again It is a three way deal...... Fulham can only buy him at the price agreed at the start of the season if all parties agree... But the main issue is Martin has to agree to sign for them He doesn't want to which is why he has signed a three year contract with derby I'm surprised at you curtains or are you just winding us up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 4 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said: You better tell Gary Roweet that then cos he's expecting him back next season and as said as much. He said he would like him back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 Just now, kash_a_ram_a_ding_dong said: Jesus not this again It is a three way deal...... Fulham can only buy him at the price agreed at the start of the season if all parties agree... But the main issue is Martin has to agree to sign for them He doesn't want to which is why he has signed a three year contract with derby I'm surprised at you curtains or are you just winding us up. No just wait and see then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 Its fair to say he may not be back because we sell him either to Fulham for the price pre-agreed, to wolves who still seem to like him or any other club who want to spend the dough on him. I just can't buy the Fulham buy him just to sell him at a mark up theory.... Its nuts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 6 minutes ago, RadioactiveWaste said: Pretty sure that can only cover the fee between the clubs, Fulham turning the loan agreement into a permanent transfer will still need Martin to have a contract with Fulham, which may have been agreed in advance and signed, and I'm sure does happen in some cases, but I'm not convinced its the case in this instance, if nothing else, he signed that new contract at Derby and if he'd got his permanent deal at Fulham I doubt he'd have been quite so injured in January. But the transfer fee agreed in the loan agreement cannot be the same thing thing as a contract between Fulham and martin - they are two seperate contracts which may or may not have been signed at the same time. Too many variables so we just have to wait and see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kash_a_ram_a_ding_dong Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 2 minutes ago, RadioactiveWaste said: Its fair to say he may not be back because we sell him either to Fulham for the price pre-agreed, to wolves who still seem to like him or any other club who want to spend the dough on him. I just can't buy the Fulham buy him just to sell him at a mark up theory.... Its nuts. Ok fair enough. But it's not a done deal he will be back at Derby just yet IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sexydadbod Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 Wolves are the ones to worry about, not Fulham. Wolves have plenty of money to splash about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazloW Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 This thread is like one of those horror movies, where the hero keeps killing the baddie, only for the baddie to keep coming back to life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 3 minutes ago, McLovin said: Wolves are the ones to worry about, not Fulham. Wolves have plenty of money to splash about Would they be able to match his new contract? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sexydadbod Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 Just now, RoyMac5 said: Would they be able to match his new contract? Course, they have mega rich owners and most importantly they are prepared to back the manager. Costa looks like he might leave in the summer for around 20 million( according to wolves fans) which will give them plenty of wiggle room within ffp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 1 minute ago, McLovin said: Costa looks like he might leave in the summer for around 20 million( according to wolves fans) Seriously? Who to, hasn't looked that good the bits of play I've seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 16 minutes ago, kash_a_ram_a_ding_dong said: Is that Chris Martin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.