Jump to content

U21 tactics and formation


MackworthRamIsGod

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply
8 minutes ago, MackworthRamIsGod said:

Does anyone have an idea what formation the u21s tend to play?

I am sure they play 2 up front, so I am guessing 442?

thanks in advance.

Diamond, I think. But I think it changes mid-game. Or at least, players switch positions to confuse. @Rampage might know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MackworthRamIsGod said:

Does anyone have an idea what formation the u21s tend to play?

I am sure they play 2 up front, so I am guessing 442?

thanks in advance.

That's what I thought...

He also played Martin and Sammon in THAT game against Ipswich... So might be looking at a front 2...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/9/2016 at 13:48, SaintRam said:

Diamond, I think. But I think it changes mid-game. Or at least, players switch positions to confuse. @Rampage might know. 

Zanzala' brother told me that Ofrande was asked to play on the way for part of the game then as centre forward to cause disruption the their defence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Derby_EnglandLoyal said:

No don't tell me what to do. Why don't you give it a 'rest' on re Bucko. 

wo there. I mentioned bucko, gave my opinion and reasoned argument why I believed it. Then defended my point with a reasoned argument.

 

why do you think we will be 0-10? What is the reason you believe it? Try to convince me you're correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They play 433 which switched to diamond at times, the last game i went too was

                          Mitchell

Ssewankambo Bucko Koblenz Stabana

                          Hanson

               Guy                  Timi Resnik

                         Calero

     Bennett                        Vernam

 

or 

as above but

 

Bennett         Vernam         Calero

 

 

Some games it stays 433

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, davenportram said:

wo there. I mentioned bucko, gave my opinion and reasoned argument why I believed it. Then defended my point with a reasoned argument.

 

why do you think we will be 0-10? What is the reason you believe it? Try to convince me you're correct?

I did mentioned Ipswich bit. 1-4 at halftime tells you a lot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Derby_EnglandLoyal said:

Doesn't matter and we'll probably be 0-10 by halftime. Look at Ipswich game 1-4 at halftime says it all. 

But MK Dons are crappier than Preston and Fulham, right?

I know the only game we won in this series was against a League Two team, but we've got to win at last, I hope?  Probability-wise it's very difficult to not get a win for so long:

DLWDLLLDD

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Derby_EnglandLoyal said:

I did mentioned Ipswich bit. 1-4 at halftime tells you a lot. 

it tells me that a team that were a bit shocked at losing the manager three days earlier got hit early by a good attacking team. It cannot be used to justify a ridiculous statement like we will be 0-10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HKRam said:

But MK Dons are crappier than Preston and Fulham, right?

I know the only game we won in this series was against a League Two team, but we've got to win at last, I hope?  Probability-wise it's very difficult to not get a win for so long:

DLWDLLLDD

 

They played very well last night though. Lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, davenportram said:

it tells me that a team that were a bit shocked at losing the manager three days earlier got hit early by a good attacking team. It cannot be used to justify a ridiculous statement like we will be 0-10.

Bore off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...