Rev Posted July 18, 2015 Share Posted July 18, 2015 Didn't MR say that his source had 'dried up' ?I wonder whether MRIG has another God now? I think we should be told.Thank Allah he joined this forum, rather than ISIS, if that's the case! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MackworthRamIsGod Posted July 18, 2015 Share Posted July 18, 2015 Very interesting. I too was 'informed' by a 'source' who claimed to be 'itk' that if my auntie had balls, she'd have been my uncle. I didn't believe a word of that either, but that's just me being an old cynic. In all seriousness I was given that information and had reason to doubt it, until the fact Keogh hasn't been selected as captain for two games now so it would suggest the person who gave me the information was either very lucky (which he could have been) or he was right. Don't you worry about being an old cynic Eddie, the world needs a cynic. It stops us happy clappers following the mooneys up to the top of a cliff and jumping head first like a Lemming. But not everything you read is bull crap, have you not read the bible? Everything in there is gospel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plymouthram Posted July 18, 2015 Share Posted July 18, 2015 The only person ITK is Paul Clement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted July 18, 2015 Share Posted July 18, 2015 In all seriousness I was given that information and had reason to doubt it, until the fact Keogh hasn't been selected as captain for two games now so it would suggest the person who gave me the information was either very lucky (which he could have been) or he was right. Don't you worry about being an old cynic Eddie, the world needs a cynic. It stops us happy clappers following the mooneys up to the top of a cliff and jumping head first like a Lemming. But not everything you read is bull crap, have you not read the bible? Everything in there is gospel Nice try, but that is not true, on so many levels. Do you mean canonical gospels? There are just four of those, yet there are 27 books in the New Testament. Furthermore, there are 39 books in the Old Testament, making 66 books in all, of which only 4 are Canonical Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John). It gets more complicated - there are non-canonical gospels (Jewish-Christian gospels, and works attributed to Thomas, Peter and Judas are also known as 'gospels' because they are all descriptions of the life and works of Jesus, but once again it is confusing because they are not part of what is traditionally accepted as 'The Bible'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plymouthram Posted July 18, 2015 Share Posted July 18, 2015 Nice try, but that is not true, on so many levels. Do you mean canonical gospels? There are just four of those, yet there are 27 books in the New Testament. Furthermore, there are 39 books in the Old Testament, making 66 books in all, of which only 4 are Canonical Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John).It gets more complicated - there are non-canonical gospels (Jewish-Christian gospels, and works attributed to Thomas, Peter and Judas are also known as 'gospels' because they are all descriptions of the life and works of Jesus, but once again it is confusing because they are not part of what is traditionally accepted as 'The Bible'. There is something wrong with my laptop, I've picked up the Christian Channel instead of the Rams Forum. Can we resume normal service soon please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rampage Posted July 18, 2015 Share Posted July 18, 2015 Call me old fashioned but I think that MackwortRamisnotGod is too long a name for this forum as it has a 'd' on the line below which lacks panache, style, verve, credibility and authenticity. Is what I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plymouthram Posted July 18, 2015 Share Posted July 18, 2015 Call me old fashioned but I think that MackwortRamisnotGod is too long a name for this forum as it has a 'd' on the line below which lacks panache, style, verve, credibility and authenticity. Is what I think.Someone help me they are now going on about a forum member with God in his name Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rampage Posted July 18, 2015 Share Posted July 18, 2015 A funny thing happened on the way to the Forum but sometimes it happens on the Forum. If some people do not find it funny then it is obviously not for 'em. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leon the ram 2009 Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 Jesus H Christ this threads **** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 Nice try, but that is not true, on so many levels. Do you mean canonical gospels? There are just four of those, yet there are 27 books in the New Testament. Furthermore, there are 39 books in the Old Testament, making 66 books in all, of which only 4 are Canonical Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John).It gets more complicated - there are non-canonical gospels (Jewish-Christian gospels, and works attributed to Thomas, Peter and Judas are also known as 'gospels' because they are all descriptions of the life and works of Jesus, but once again it is confusing because they are not part of what is traditionally accepted as 'The Bible'. Eddie, my goodness. Suppose a little bit of here say don't go amiss. Especially when 50% of planet believes theses books! written to my mind by persons unknown.....and selected for general publication by a Roman emperormonty python is best place to go for a realistic view of bible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Scarlet Pimpernel Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 Eddie, my goodness. Suppose a little bit of here say don't go amiss. Especially when 50% of planet believes theses books! written to my mind by persons unknown.....and selected for general publication by a Roman emperormonty python is best place to go for a realistic view of bible Have you read it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 Have you read it?most definitely not. I am partial to aesop fables though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintRam Posted July 20, 2015 Share Posted July 20, 2015 Bryson was wearing the captains armband at the end of the game, right? I thought that was interesting. Baird was playing DM, suggests to me that PC prefers his captains to be in midfield, maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamLad1884 Posted July 20, 2015 Share Posted July 20, 2015 I don't think we can even begin to guess who PC has in mind for the captain's role. He may be trialling lots of different players or he may even adopt a rotation system where different players are captain throughout the season (hence the point of a club captain being permanent and the game captain being based on form, opposition formation etc). Plus there Could be plenty of players coming in lined up to do the role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryram Posted July 20, 2015 Share Posted July 20, 2015 Looks like Baird could play a bigger part this season than most imagined. I hope that isn't at the expense of Thorne surely not if a fully fit thorne is not played then think Clement needs his head testing. George is pure class think would easily make transition to prem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McRamFan Posted July 20, 2015 Share Posted July 20, 2015 Maybe we will have a pool of captains and each is used for a particular system, makes sense to me..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuanFloEvraTheCocu'sNesta Posted July 20, 2015 Share Posted July 20, 2015 You need to pick one captain and stick with him. I don't think having numerous captains will help anything. I think not being captain might do Keogh some good if he stays. He is a good player, he just needs to concentrate fully on his job for 90 minutes to avoid making his one error per game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McRamFan Posted July 20, 2015 Share Posted July 20, 2015 Why? I've worked in teams where different people have lead, why can't it work in football. actually why bother having a captain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev Posted July 20, 2015 Share Posted July 20, 2015 surely not if a fully fit thorne is not played then think Clement needs his head testing. George is pure class think would easily make transition to premMaybe Clement's protecting Thorne, easing the pressure on him to be fit and available ASAP, in the meantime Baird seems a capable enough player in his own right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-JW- Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 Martin is captain tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.