Ambitious Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 A few stats from the games... Forest had 22 shots against Yeovil with only four on target. We had 19 against Birmingham with nine on target. Both sides had 73% pass success. We made 412 passes, Forest 395. Forest played 74 long balls, we played 57. We had 54% possession to Forest's 53% Forest made 21 tackles, we made 8! (that's quite telling - not aggressive enough?) Yeovil had 17 shots, Birmingham had 11 - both Yeovil and Birmingham had the same number of shots on target. Just a few stats, in comparison to our game against Yeovil though... We had 36 shots, 7 on target. 82% pass success with 593 passes, 79 long balls - 19 tackles (bit better)... Yeovil had 8 shots but hit 4 on target. We also had 68% of the possession. Results aside, the stats sway in our direction... slightly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoners Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 'd/14/02/03/2u4e9usu' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knowle Rohrer Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 Really don't believe QPR are all that They ll be in play off for me Derby forest and burnley for second QPR's squad looks by the far the best on paper but many of their players are well past their best now and vastly overpaid. Losing Austin is a hammer blow for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 "d/14/02/03/2u4e9usu" alt="2u4e9usu"> 50% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoners Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 50% Posted that 10 minutes ago, where you been? Google image search Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Posted that 10 minutes ago, where you been? Google image search No, I've actually been trying to sort my iTunes out - haven't updated music for a while.. Bet you wasn't expecting that answer now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerTedd Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 50% That's not right though, is it? The correct answer should be 50%, but there's only the one 50% option, so the answer is 25%. But there are 2 25%, so the answer is 50%... My brain hurts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDCAR Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 David Kelly on Forest third goal... "It was a great goal, a striker's goal - off his bum, off his hand and into the back of the net from a couple of yards," said Kelly. Isn't that hand ball?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerTedd Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 So it is, in fact, a "crap striker's goal". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Munich '79 Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 A few stats from the games... Forest had 22 shots against Yeovil with only four on target. We had 19 against Birmingham with nine on target. Both sides had 73% pass success. We made 412 passes, Forest 395. Forest played 74 long balls, we played 57. We had 54% possession to Forest's 53% Forest made 21 tackles, we made 8! (that's quite telling - not aggressive enough?) Yeovil had 17 shots, Birmingham had 11 - both Yeovil and Birmingham had the same number of shots on target. Just a few stats, in comparison to our game against Yeovil though... We had 36 shots, 7 on target. 82% pass success with 593 passes, 79 long balls - 19 tackles (bit better)... Yeovil had 8 shots but hit 4 on target. We also had 68% of the possession. Results aside, the stats sway in our direction... slightly. You missed one - Yeovil only scored once against Forest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cam the Ram Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 ******* hell they all come crawling out now. Spent around 10 million this season and aren't in the top 2, well done! And also, this season's total against Yeovil: Yeovil 4-4 Forest Yeovil 2-6 Derby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Munich '79 Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 ******* hell they all come crawling out now. Spent around 10 million this season and aren't in the top 2, well done! And also, this season's total against Yeovil: Yeovil 4-4 Forest Yeovil 2-6 Derby Top two is done and dusted. We've spent money but so have Leicester and QPR (more than us I think). Can't see either Forest or Derby missing out on the play-offs either...collision is inevitable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewetube Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Top two is done and dusted. We've spent money but so have Leicester and QPR (more than us I think). Can't see either Forest or Derby missing out on the play-offs either...collision is inevitable I disagree, I think 2nd place is there for the taking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDCAR Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 If Derby beat QPR then that will really stir things up... Along with Forests up and coming fixtures, some of which are quite tricky (pardon the pun). Leicester (H) Burnley (A) after the Huddersfield away match... if they don't lose to either of those then play offs - at least I reckon. However, some other tricky away fixtures... Ipswich, Boro ........ oh and yes, Derby! Oh heck, they still got to go to QPR.... blimey, in for an interesting few weeks you guys. ___________________________________________________________________________ Derby still to go to Burnley, Reading, Ipswich, Sheff Weds, Leeds, Boro... they look the toughest of the lot...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 "d/14/02/03/2u4e9usu" alt="2u4e9usu"> 0%. It is a probability paradox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shuff264 Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Surely its 33.3333333% as there are only three options....? Edit: I googled it, I feel stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abu Derby Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Is it 'A' and 'D'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Kevin Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Top two is done and dusted. We've spent money but so have Leicester and QPR (more than us I think). Can't see either Forest or Derby missing out on the play-offs either...collision is inevitable Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerTedd Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Surely its 33.3333333% as there are only three options....? Edit: I googled it, I feel stupid My dad thought it was a 1:3 chance as well. And he's a proper scientist. He now feels stupid too. So touché stoners. But my Dad doesn't like football, an if he did he'd be a reading fan. So he is stupid anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaddesdenRam Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Top two is done and dusted. We've spent money but so have Leicester and QPR (more than us I think). Can't see either Forest or Derby missing out on the play-offs either...collision is inevitable i think we have actually made a profit this season, so technically we haven't spent money. oh just seen your logo, i guess you mean we spent money as in forest. ignore me if you are a forest fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.