Barney1991

1-0!!!! Cross from the right by Ward finds Sibley arriving on the edge of the box, his side footed finish deflects in off a defender. 
Fans in fine voice. Let’s go again and get another! 🐏 

So. 85 mins of sitting back and inviting pressure now?

Think you might just need nip toilet 

Think you might just need nip toilet 

Instead of trying to cause an argument on here why not give your opinion the other way in a positive spin instead of digs at fellow posters in a forum for opinions which people are entitled too!! 
 
I read posts from both points of view pro warne negative warne and can see valid points from both. One opinion is no more valid than the other 

Instead of trying to cause an argument on here why not give your opinion the other way in a positive spin instead of digs at fellow posters in a forum for opinions which people are entitled too!! 
 
I read posts from both points of view pro warne negative warne and can see valid points from both. One opinion is no more valid than the other 

Fair play to them giving an academy player a go. How id love to see one of our academy players notably a Darren Robinson given a go who is being touted by players higher up the pyramid 

I personally think a back 3 is a good option...but we have played it poorly at times.
We have seemed to spread really wide and then pass it out from the keeper and play it ponderously across the back 3 to the other side and inevitably knock it down the line. Its congested, are receiving the ball with our backs to the goal at chest height.
Cue scrappy game, lots of free kicks for backing in, ton of throw ins ...and we lose control of the game.

Instead of trying to cause an argument on here why not give your opinion the other way in a positive spin instead of digs at fellow posters in a forum for opinions which people are entitled too!! 
 
I read posts from both points of view pro warne negative warne and can see valid points from both. One opinion is no more valid than the other 

This post can’t agree more. 3 cbs doesn’t always mean negative I agree. Chelsea when they won the prem couldn’t win with a back 4 and moved to 343 and won something like 17 games in a row and stormed the prem having fell on the formation. 
 
our style of play though is we don’t use the formation great at all. We bypass midfield and don’t move the ball quick enough with 2 touch passing to get out and instead of using it offensively we end up getting pinned in with the wingbacks so high up we get countered. If we start to get the ball on the deck and get some movement higher up to pull players out we can get out and use it out advantage 

This post can’t agree more. 3 cbs doesn’t always mean negative I agree. Chelsea when they won the prem couldn’t win with a back 4 and moved to 343 and won something like 17 games in a row and stormed the prem having fell on the formation. 
 
our style of play though is we don’t use the formation great at all. We bypass midfield and don’t move the ball quick enough with 2 touch passing to get out and instead of using it offensively we end up getting pinned in with the wingbacks so high up we get countered. If we start to get the ball on the deck and get some movement higher up to pull players out we can get out and use it out advantage 

This post can’t agree more. 3 cbs doesn’t always mean negative I agree. Chelsea when they won the prem couldn’t win with a back 4 and moved to 343 and won something like 17 games in a row and stormed the prem having fell on the formation. 
 
our style of play though is we don’t use the formation great at all. We bypass midfield and don’t move the ball quick enough with 2 touch passing to get out and instead of using it offensively we end up getting pinned in with the wingbacks so high up we get countered. If we start to get the ball on the deck and get some movement higher up to pull players out we can get out and use it out advantage 

Instead of trying to cause an argument on here why not give your opinion the other way in a positive spin instead of digs at fellow posters in a forum for opinions which people are entitled too!! 
 
I read posts from both points of view pro warne negative warne and can see valid points from both. One opinion is no more valid than the other 

Instead of trying to cause an argument on here why not give your opinion the other way in a positive spin instead of digs at fellow posters in a forum for opinions which people are entitled too!! 
 
I read posts from both points of view pro warne negative warne and can see valid points from both. One opinion is no more valid than the other 

If as most think on here that it is a three up front where does this leave Blackett-Taylor?
Seems our January window “number one target” (according to Pearce) can’t get into this line up.  

Some reckon his body language ain’t great…………….no bloody wonder! 🤔
 
 

Either way this set up just isolates Gayle.
The only way to get something out of his type of striker is to have someone just never more than 5-10 yards behind so they can latch onto his movement of defenders.
If Bird and Adams are playing that flat 2 were gonna need Sibley and Ward to not give the ball away so easily when we've committed to attacks. 

Instead of trying to cause an argument on here why not give your opinion the other way in a positive spin instead of digs at fellow posters in a forum for opinions which people are entitled too!! 
 
I read posts from both points of view pro warne negative warne and can see valid points from both. One opinion is no more valid than the other 

As I said before, if you do logical things and don’t get logical outcomes, people are more forgiving.
But picking Ward when he hasn’t had a look in for weeks and has been playing with the under 21s makes no sense to me.
Picking Barkhuizen who has 1 good game for every 6-7 forgettable ones over your marquee January signing who will only adapt with game time makes no sense to me.
Picking Bradley when it disrupts our strongest partnership of Nelson and Cashin again makes no sense to me.
Let’s hope we blow Port Vale away and win 3-0 because if not the pressure will crank up on Warne over his team selections because this one looks very muddled.

And it's becoming ever increasingly apparent that we have been right all this time.
There's only a handful of you left.

Someone said the same to me last week..we lost
 

Yep, think it well be that. Need to be wary of Port Vales’s attacking threat so need to be a bit cautious 😊

Thats a confusing line up. 3 at the back again sibley lwb and ward rwb? 

Maybe as we are all rooting for a change today to bring in the good fortune we could see a change from a bottle hat to a flag cap for Warney and a back 4 with cashin and Nelson back to centre half. 

I’ve actually rated warne a lot through the season. When we had the purple patch and he picked a more front thinking team and took the game to the opposition and made forward thinking subs. Played 4 at the back. Since posh on New Year’s Day he has reverted back to the end of last season where he has become overly negative in games and sets us up depending on what the opposition does and tries to hold on to a goal lead from the start of the second half. The warning sign was theee when Charlton hit the post from a corner and started to gain control and he did nothing to try and get a foothold again to get us up the pitch when we couldn’t get out 

Maybe as we are all rooting for a change today to bring in the good fortune we could see a change from a bottle hat to a flag cap for Warney and a back 4 with cashin and Nelson back to centre half.